Log in

Long-term follow-up after umbilical hernia repair: are there risk factors for recurrence after simple and mesh repair

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Hernia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Adult umbilical hernia is a common surgical condition mainly encountered in the fifth and sixth decade of life. Despite the high frequency of the umbilical hernia repair procedure, disappointingly high recurrence rates, up to 54% for simple suture repair, are reported. Since both mesh and suture techniques are used in our clinic we set out to investigate the respective recurrence rates and associated complications, retrospectively. Patients who were treated between January 1998 and December 2002 were identified from our hospital database and invited to attend the outpatient department for an extra follow-up, history taking and physical examination. The use of prosthetic material, occurrence of surgical site infection, body mass and height as well as recurrence were recorded at the time of this survey. In total, 131 consecutive patients underwent operative repair of an umbilical hernia. Twenty-eight percent of the patients were female (n=37). In 12 patients (11%) umbilical hernia repair was achieved with mesh implantation. Fourteen umbilical hernia recurrences were noted (13%); none had been repaired using mesh. No relationship was found between wound infection or obesity and umbilical hernia recurrence. In the light of these results it is necessary to re-evaluate our clinical “guidelines” on mesh placement in umbilical hernia repair: apparently not every umbilical fascial defect needs mesh repair. Research should focus on establishing risk factors for hernia recurrence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Harmel RP (1989) Umbilical hernia. In: Nyhus LM (ed) Hernia (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, JB Lippincott), pp 347–352

  2. Pescovitz MD (1984) Umbilical hernia repair in patients with cirrhosis. No evidence for increased incidence of variceal bleeding. Ann Surg 199:325–327

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Jackson OJ, Moglen LH (1970) Umbilical hernia. A retrospective study. Calif Med 113:8–11

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kulah B, Kulacoglu IH, Oruc MT, Duzgun AP, Moran M, Ozmen MM, Coskun F (2001) Presentation and outcome of incarcerated external hernias in adults. Am J Surg 181:101–104

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mayo WJ (1901) An operation for the radical cure of umbilical hernia. Ann Surg 34:276–280

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Schumacher OP, Peiper C, Lorken M, Schumpelick V (2003) [Long-term results after Spitzy’s umbilical hernia repair]. Chirurg 74:50–54

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Askar OM (1978) A new concept of the aetiology and surgical repair of paraumbilical and epigastric hernias. Ann R Col Surg Eng 60:42–48

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Luijendijk RW, Lemmen MH, Hop WC, Wereldsma JC (1997) Incisional hernia recurrence following “vest-over-pants” or vertical Mayo repair of primary hernias of the midline. World J Surg 21: 62–5; discussion 66

    Google Scholar 

  9. Arroyo A, Garcia P, Perez F, Andreu J, Candela F, Calpena R (2001) Randomized clinical trial comparing suture and mesh repair of umbilical hernia in adults. Br J Surg 88:1321–1323

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Arroyo Sebastian A, Perez F, Serrano P, Costa D, Oliver I, Ferrer R, Lacueva J, Calpena R (2002) Is prosthetic umbilical hernia repair bound to replace primary herniorrhaphy in the adult patient? Hernia 6:175–177

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bowley DM, Kingsnorth AN (2000) Umbilical hernia, Mayo or mesh? Hernia 4:195–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Burger JW, Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, Halm JA, Verdaasdonk EG, Jeekel J (2004) Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia (discussion 583–585). Ann Surg 240:578–583

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, van den Tol MP, de Lange DC, Braaksma MM, JN IJ, Boelhouwer RU, de Vries BC, Salu MK, Wereldsma JC, Bruijninckx CM, Jeekel J (2000) A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. N Engl J Med 343:392–398

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kurzer M, Belsham PA, Kark AE (2004) Tension-free mesh repair of umbilical hernia as a day case using local anaesthesia. Hernia 8:104–107

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lau H, Patil NG (2003) Umbilical hernia in adults. Surg Endosc 17(12):2016–2020

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Celdran A, Bazire P, Garcia-Urena MA, Marijuan JL (1995) H-hernioplasty: a tension-free repair for umbilical hernia. Br J Surg 82:371–372

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. A. Halm.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Halm, J.A., Heisterkamp, J., Veen, H.F. et al. Long-term follow-up after umbilical hernia repair: are there risk factors for recurrence after simple and mesh repair. Hernia 9, 334–337 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-005-0010-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-005-0010-1

Keywords

Navigation