Log in

Completely displaced supracondylar humerus fractures in children: results of open reduction versus closed reduction

  • Published:
Journal of Orthopaedic Science

Abstract.

 This retrospective study was performed to understand the clinical results after closed reduction and open reduction in 35 children (mean age 6.4 years) with completely displaced supracondylar fractures of the distal humerus between 1996 and 2000. Closed reduction (21 cases) was attempted, with open reduction (14 cases) indicated in irreducible cases with or without severe swelling. After an average follow-up of 22 months, according to Flynn's criteria, the results were excellent in 18, good in 12, fair in 2, and poor in 3. The satisfactory results rates were similar for closed and open reduction. The unsatisfactory results were related to the poor initial reduction and redisplacement after operation. The mean Baumann's angle was 8.7° in the closed reduction group and 6.6° in the open reduction group. None of the patients showed restricted elbow motion of more than 10°, even in two cases of hypertrophic scar in the open reduction group. Selective open reduction for displaced supracondylar fractures of the distal humerus produced as good results as closed reduction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: January 7, 2002 / Accepted: November 20, 2002

Offprint requests to: C-W. Oh

About this article

Cite this article

Oh, CW., Park, BC., Kim, PT. et al. Completely displaced supracondylar humerus fractures in children: results of open reduction versus closed reduction. J Orthop Sci 8, 137–141 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s007760300023

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s007760300023

Navigation