Abstract
Background
Analysis of the movement of anatomically defined reference axes at the femoral condyles relative to the tibia is appropriate for evaluating knee kinematics. However, such parameters have been previously employed only in studies utilizing stop-motion techniques. The purpose of this study was to evaluate in vivo dynamic kinematics for full range of motion in normal knees using the three-dimensional to two-dimensional registration technique and to compare them with previously reported normal knee kinematics obtained via stop-motion techniques.
Methods
Dynamic motion of the right knee was analyzed in 20 healthy volunteers (10 female, 10 male; mean age 37.2 years). Knee motion was observed when subjects squatted from standing with the knee fully extended to maximum flexion. We determined the following parameters: (1) changes to angles of the geometric center axis (GCA) on the tibial axial plane (rotation angle); (2) anteroposterior translations of the medial and lateral ends of the GCA; and (3) motion patterns in each phase during knee flexion.
Results
All subjects exhibited femoral external rotation (26.1°) relative to the tibia throughout knee flexion. The medial femoral condyle demonstrated anterior translation (5.5 mm) from full extension to 100° flexion, and demonstrated posterior translation (3.9 mm) after 100°, while the lateral femoral condyle demonstrated consistent posterior translation (15.6 mm) throughout knee flexion. All subjects showed medial pivot motion from full extension to nearly 120° flexion. From 120° flexion, bicondylar rollback motion was observed.
Discussion
Although the behavior of the medial femoral condyle in our analysis differed somewhat from that seen in previous cadaver studies, the results obtained using dynamic analysis were generally equivalent to those obtained in previous studies employing stop-motion techniques. These results provide control data for future dynamic kinematic analyses of pathological knees.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00776-011-0149-9/MediaObjects/776_2011_149_Fig1_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00776-011-0149-9/MediaObjects/776_2011_149_Fig2_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00776-011-0149-9/MediaObjects/776_2011_149_Fig3_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00776-011-0149-9/MediaObjects/776_2011_149_Fig4_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00776-011-0149-9/MediaObjects/776_2011_149_Fig5_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00776-011-0149-9/MediaObjects/776_2011_149_Fig6_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00776-011-0149-9/MediaObjects/776_2011_149_Fig7_HTML.gif)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Asano T, Akagi M, Tanaka K, Tamura J, Nakamura T. In vivo three-dimensional knee kinematics using a biplanar image-matching technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;388:157–66.
Iwaki H, Pinskerova V, Freeman MA. Tibiofemoral movement 1: the shapes and relative movements of the femur and tibia in the unloaded cadaver knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82:1189–95.
Pinskerova V, Samuelson KM, Stammers J, Maruthainar K, Sosna A, Freeman MA. The knee in full flexion. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:830–4.
Kurosawa H, Walker PS, Abe S, Garg A, Hunter T. Geometry and motion of the knee for implant and orthotic design. J Biomech. 1985;18:487–99.
Walker PS, Kurosawa H, Rovick JS, Zimmerman RA. External knee joint design based on normal motion. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1985;22:9–22.
Churchill DL, Incavo SJ, Johnson CC, Beynnon BD. The transepicondylar axis approximates the optimal flexion axis of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;356:111–8.
Hill PF, Vedi V, Williams A, Iwaki H, Pinskerova V, Freeman MA. Tibiofemoral movement 2: the loaded and unloaded living knee studied by MRI. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82:1196–8.
Nakagawa S, Kadoya Y, Todo S, Kobayashi A, Sakamoto H, Freeman MA, Yamano Y. Tibiofemoral movement 3: full flexion in the living knee studied by MRI. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82:1199–200.
Most E, Axe J, Rubash H, Li G. Sensitivity of the knee joint kinematics calculation to selection of flexion axes. J Biomech. 2004;37:1743–8.
Williams A, Logan M. Understanding tibio-femoral motion. Knee. 2004;11:81–8.
Asano T, Akagi M, Nakamura T. The functional flexion-extension axis of the knee corresponds to the surgical epicondylar axis: in vivo analysis using a biplanar image matching technique. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:1060–7.
Banks SA, Markovich GD, Hodge WA. In vivo kinematics of cruciate-retaining and -substituting knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty. 1997;12:297–304.
Hoff WA, Komistek RD, Dennis DA, Gabriel SM, Walker SA. Three-dimensional determination of femoral-tibial contact positions under in vivo conditions using fluoroscopy. Clin Biomech. 1998;13:455–72.
Yamazaki T, Watanabe T, Nakajima Y, Sugamoto K, Tomita T, Yoshikawa H, Tamura S. Improvement of depth position in 2-D/3-D registration of knee implants using single-plane fluoroscopy. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2004;23:602–12.
Li G, Suggs J, Hanson G, Durbhakula S, Johnson T, Freiberg A. Three-dimensional tibiofemoral articular contact kinematics of a cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:395–402.
Komistek RD, Mahfouz MR, Bertin KC, Rosenberg A, Kennedy W. In vivo determination of total knee arthroplasty kinematics. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23:41–50.
Tamaki M, Tomita T, Yamazaki T, Hozack WJ, Yoshikawa H, Sugamoto K. In vivo kinematic analysis of a high-flexion posterior stabilized fixed-bearing knee prosthesis in deep knee-bending motion. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23:879–85.
Komistek RD, Dennis DA, Mahfouz M. In vivo fluoroscopic analysis of the normal human knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;410:69–81.
Moro-oka T, Hamai S, Miura H, Shimoto T, Higaki H, Fregly BJ, Iwamoto Y, Banks SA. Dynamic activity dependence of in vivo normal knee kinematics. J Orthop Res. 2008;26:428–34.
Li G, Moses JM, Papannagari R, Pathare NP, DeFrate LE, Gill TJ. Anterior cruciate ligament deficiency alters the in vivo motion of the tibiofemoral cartilage contact points in both the anteroposterior and mediolateral directions. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:1826–34.
Sato T, Koga Y, Omori G. Three-dimensional lower extremity alignment assessment system. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:620–8.
Kobayashi K, Tanaka N, Odagawa K, Sakamoto M, Tanabe Y. Image-based matching for natural knee kinematics measurement using single-plane fluoroscopy. J Jpn Soc Exp Mech. 2009;9:162–6.
Grood ES, Suntay WJ. A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. J Biomech Eng. 1983;105:136–44.
Blaha JD, Mancinelli CA, Simons WH, Kish VL, Thyagarajan G. Kinematics of the human knee using an open chain cadaver model. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;410:25–34.
Dennis DA, Mahfouz MR, Komistek RD, Hoff W. In vivo determination of normal and anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee kinematics. J Biomech. 2005;38:241–53.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the entire staff of the Department of Radiology of the Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital for their technical support and cooperation.
Conflict of interest
The authors did not receive and will not receive any benefits or funding from any commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Tanifuji, O., Sato, T., Kobayashi, K. et al. Three-dimensional in vivo motion analysis of normal knees using single-plane fluoroscopy. J Orthop Sci 16, 710–718 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-011-0149-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-011-0149-9