Abstract
Background
Antimicrobial prophylaxis (AMP) can reduce the risk of surgical-site infection (SSI) following many types of surgery, particularly spinal surgery. After publication of the Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in 1999, a large number of studies confirmed the effectiveness of AMP. However, because the concept of AMP is not clear in Japan, the duration of postoperative AMP tends to be long. The purpose of this study was to compare the infection rates following spinal surgery for postoperative AMP versus no postoperative AMP.
Methods
The study comprised 284 patients who underwent spinal surgery without instrumentation at our hospital from October 2003 to August 2009. The patients were divided into two groups based on the method of AMP administration: a postoperative dose group and a no postoperative dose group. SSI incidences were calculated for the two groups.
Results
The incidence of SSI was 2.1% (6/284) overall and 2. 8% (4/141) vs. 1.4% (2/143) for the postoperative dose and no postoperative dose groups, respectively. The infection rate difference between the two groups was not significant. The incidence of SSI showed a downward trend as the frequency of antibiotics decreased. Two cases of pseudomembranous colitis, both in the postoperative dose group, were the only complications of the antibiotics.
Conclusions
AMP duration was not related to the SSI rate. SSIs trended lower in the no postoperative dose group compared with the postoperative dose group. Postoperative administration of AMP appears to be unnecessary for spinal decompression surgery without instrumentation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
El-Gindi S, Aref S, Salama M, Andrew J. Infection of intervertebral discs after operation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1976;58:114–116.
Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR. Guideline for the prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Am J Infect Control 1999;27:97–132.
Matsushita K. Guideline for the use of antimicrobial drugs. 1st edn. Tokyo: Kyowa Kikaku; 2005. p. 181–185 (in Japanese).
Horwitz NH, Curtin JA. Prophylactic antibiotics and wound infections following laminectomy for lumbar disc herniation. J Neurosurg 1975;43:727–731.
Burke JF. The effective period of preventative antibiotics action in experimental incisions and dermal lesions. Surgery 1961;50:161–168.
Fang A, Hu SS, Endres N, Bradford DS. Risk factors for infection after spinal surgery. Spine 2005;30:1460–1465.
National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System Report: data summary from January 1992 through June 2004, issued October 2004. Am J Infect Control 2004;32:470–485.
Nohara Y, Taneichi H, Ueyama K, Kawahara N, Shiba K, Tokuhashi Y, et al. Nationwide survey on complications of spine surgery in Japan. J Orthop Sci 2004;9:424–433.
Dimick JB, Lipsett PA, Kostuik JP. Spine update: antimicrobial prophylaxis in spine surgery: basic principles and recent advances. Spine 2000;25:2544–2548.
Steinberg JP, Braun BI, Hellinger WC, Kusek L, Bozikis MR, Bush AJ, et al. Timing of antimicrobial prophylaxis and the risk of surgical site infections. Ann Surg 2009;250:10–16.
Dobzyniak MA, Fischgrund JS, Hankins S, Herkowitz HN. Single versus multiple dose antibiotic prophylaxis in lumbar disc surgery. Spine 2003;28:E453–E455.
Kanayama M, Hashimoto T, Shigenobu K, Oha F, Togawa D. Effective prevention of surgical site infection using a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guideline-based antimicrobial prophylaxis in lumbar spine surgery. J Neurosurg (Spine) 2007;6:327–329.
Takahashi H, Wada A, Iida Y, Yokoyama Y, Katori S, Hasegawa K, et al. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for spinal surgery. J Orthop Sci 2009;14:40–44.
Olsen MA, Nepple JJ, Riew KD, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Mayfield J, et al. Risk factors for surgical site infection following orthopaedic spinal operations. J Bone Joint Surg 2008;90:62–69.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Kakimaru, H., Kono, M., Matsusaki, M. et al. Postoperative antimicrobial prophylaxis following spinal decompression surgery: is it necessary?. J Orthop Sci 15, 305–309 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-010-1464-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-010-1464-2