Abstract
A macrozoobenthos interlaboratory comparison was carried out by 16 laboratories to check the taxonomical expertise and the precision of sorting and counting. Participating laboratories had to determine and count in an artificial sediment sample 22 selected macrozoobenthos species taken from the western Baltic Sea. Two methods for the analysis of data were applied: assessment of qualitative and quantitative successful hits and the maximum-likelihood method.
The results of counting were mostly precise (one lab without mistake). Four laboratories had a rate of false determination of 10%, eight laboratories between 10 and 20% and four laboratories of more than 20%.
The species Arctica islandica, Retusa obtusa, Fabricia stellaris, Polydora quadrilobata, Pholoe assimilis, Microdeutopus gryllotalpa, and Corophium crassicorne caused some problems at the species determination step.
The comparison of the different methods of statistical data analysis shows that the maximum-likelihood method is more sensitive than the method of successful hits.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ranasinghe JA, Montagne DE, Weisberg SB, Bergen M, Verlarde RG (2003) Environ Monitor Assess 81:199–206
Ellis DV, Cross SF (1981) Water Res 15:1107–1108
Rousseuuw PJ, Croux C (1993) J Am Stat Assoc 88:1273–1283
Uhlig S (1997) Robust estimation of variance components with high breakdown point in the 1-way random effect model. In: Kitsos CP, Edler L (eds) Industrial statistics. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, pp 65–73
Müller C, Uhlig S (2001) Biometrika 88:353–366
Hampel FR, Rousseeuw PJ, Ronchetti EM, Stahel WA (1986) Robust statistics: the approach based on influence functions. Wiley, New York
McCullagh P, Nelder JA (1989) Generalized linear models. Chapman & Hall, London
Petersen M (1998) J Mar Biol Assoc UK 78:1373–1376
Bick A, Gosselck F (1985) Mitt Zoo Mus Berl 61/2:171–272
Hartmann-Schröder G (1996) Annelida, Borstenwürmer, Polychaeta. In Dahl F (ed) Die Tierwelt Deutschlands und der angrenzenden Meeresteile nach ihren Merkmalen und ihrer Lebensweise, Teil 58, 2nd edn. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena, pp 1–648
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Renate Deutschmann and Eva Schmidt for their excellent technical assistance and all laboratories for participating in the interlaboratory comparison.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schilling, P., Powilleit, M. & Uhlig, S. Macrozoobenthos interlaboratory comparison on taxonomical identification and counting of marine invertebrates in artificial sediment samples including testing various statistical methods of data evaluation. Accred Qual Assur 11, 422–429 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-006-0139-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-006-0139-3