SpringerLink
Log in

The impact of timing of cranioplasty in patients with large cranial defects after decompressive hemicraniectomy

  • Clinical Article
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

It is unclear how soon after a decompressive hemicraniectomy that cranioplasty be safely performed in a patient in whom the ICP has been normalized. Early surgery has been associated with infection, intracerebral hematoma, and complications due to persistent or recurrent brain edema. Delayed cranioplasty of large cranial defects exposes the patient to different conditions known in the literature as the syndrome of the sinking skin flap. The purpose of this study was to investigate the hypothesis that timing of cranioplasty after decompressive hemicraniectomy influences outcome and complications.

Methods

We retrospectively examined outcome after cranioplasty performed at <7 weeks, 7–12 weeks, and >13 weeks after craniectomy in patients with large cranial defects after decompressive hemicraniectomy in our institution between 1997 and 2008.

Results

The time between craniectomy and cranioplasty ranged from 17 days to 4 months depending on several factors such as: the cause of decompression, infection before or after craniectomy, and skin flap concavity. The analysis of the registered postoperative complications revealed that there were no significant differences between the examined groups. The cranioplasty at <7 weeks, in the form of reimplantation of the own skull flap, led to a GOS improvement of 78 %, at 7–12 weeks 46 % and at >13 weeks12 %, respectively. Pairwise comparisons showed that the difference between cranioplasty at <7 weeks versus 7–12 weeks or >13 weeks cranioplasty groups was statistically significant (p = 0.05 and p < 0.001, respectively).

Conclusions

Our study suggests that many patients with large cranial defects after decompressive craniectomy can safely undergo cranioplasty in an early stage; direct answers to these questions of timing of cranioplasty are best addressed by prospective studies. Nevertheless, the present study provides a basis for decision-making in certain patients and for the design of future investigations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CI:

Confidence interval

CSF:

Cerebrospinal fluid

GCS:

Glasgow Coma Scale

GOS:

Glasgow Outcome Scale

ICH:

Intracerebral hemorrhage

ICP:

Intracranial pressure

OR:

Odds ratio

SAH:

Subarachnoidal hemorrhage

References

  1. Adamo MA, Deshaies EM (2008) Emergency decompressive craniectomy for fulminating infectious encephalitis. J Neurosurg 108(1):174–176, Review

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Agner C, Dujovny M, Gaviria M (2002) Neurocognitive assessment before and after cranioplasty. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 44(10):1033–1040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Arnaud E (2000) Advances in cranioplasty with osteoinductive biomaterials: summary of experimental studies and clinical prospects. Childs Nerv Syst 16(10–11):659–668

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hofmeijer J, Kappelle LJ, Algra A, Amelink GJ, van Gijn J, van der Worp HB, HAMLET investigators (2009) Surgical decompression for space-occupying cerebral infarction (the Hemicraniectomy After Middle Cerebral Artery infarction with Life-threatening Edema Trial [HAMLET]): a multicentre, open, randomised trial. Lancet Neurol 8(4):326–333

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jüttler E, Schwab S, Schmiedek P, Unterberg A, Hennerici M, Woitzik J, Witte S, Jenetzky E, Hacke W, DESTINY Study Group (2007) Decompressive Surgery for the Treatment of Malignant Infarction of the Middle Cerebral Artery (DESTINY): a randomized, controlled trial. Stroke 38(9):2518–2525

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hutchinson PJ, Corteen E, Czosnyka M, Mendelow AD, Menon DK, Mitchell P, Murray G, Pickard JD, Rickels E, Sahuquillo J, Servadei F, Teasdale GM, Timofeev I, Unterberg A, Kirkpatrick PJ (2006) Decompressive craniectomy in traumatic brain injury: the randomized multicenter RESCUEicp study (www.RESCUEicp.com). Acta Neurochir Suppl 96:17–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Vahedi K, Hofmeijer J, Juettler E, Vicaut E, George B, Algra A, Amelink GJ, Schmiedeck P, Schwab S, Rothwell PM, Bousser MG, van der Worp HB, Hacke W, DECIMAL, DESTINY, and HAMLET investigators (2007) Early decompressive surgery in malignant infarction of the middle cerebral artery: a pooled analysis of three randomised controlled trials. Lancet Neurol 6(3):215–222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dujovny M, Agner C, Aviles A (1999) Syndrome of the trephined: theory and facts. Crit Rev Neurosurg 9(5):271–278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sarov M, Guichard JP, Chibarro S, Guettard E, Godin O, Yelnik A, George B, Bousser MG, Vahedi K, DECIMAL investigators (2010) Sinking skin flap syndrome and paradoxical herniation after hemicraniectomy for malignant hemispheric infarction. Stroke 41(3):560–562

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Winkler PA, Stummer W, Linke R, Krishnan KG, Tatsch K (2000) Influence of cranioplasty on postural blood flow regulation, cerebrovascular reserve capacity, and cerebral glucose metabolism. J Neurosurg 93(1):53–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bijlenga P, Zumofen D, Yilmaz H, Creisson E, de Tribolet N (2007) Orthostatic mesodiencephalic dysfunction after decompressive craniectomy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 78(4):430–433

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fodstad H, Love JA, Ekstedt J, Fridén H, Liliequist B (1984) Effect of cranioplasty on cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamics in patients with the syndrome of the trephined. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 70(1–2):21–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Schiffer J, Gur R, Nisim U, Pollak L (1997) Symptomatic patients after craniectomy. Surg Neurol 47(3):231–237, Review

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Segal DH, Oppenheim JS, Murovic JA (1994) Neurological recovery after cranioplasty. Neurosurgery 34(4):729–731

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dujovny M, Aviles A, Agner C, Fernandez P, Charbel FT (1997) Cranioplasty: cosmetic or therapeutic? SurgNeurol 47(3):238–241, Review

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Dujovny M, Fernandez P, Alperin N, Betz W, Misra M, Mafee M (1997) Post-cranioplasty cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamic changes: magnetic resonance imaging quantitative analysis. Neurol Res 19(3):311–316

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Chang V, Hartzfeld P, Langlois M, Mahmood A, Seyfried D (2010) Outcomes of cranial repair after craniectomy. J Neurosurg 112(5):1120–1124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Regel JP, Stolke D (2004) Dekompressive Kraniektomie aus neurochirurgischer Sicht. In: Moskopp, Wassmann (Hrsg) Neurochirurgie. Schattauer Verlag, S 231–238

  19. Schimidek H (2000) Operative neurosurgical technique: cranioplasty: indications, technique and prognosis, 4th edn. Elsevier Science, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  20. Matsuno A, Tanaka H, Iwamuro H, Takanashi S, Miyawaki S, Nakashima M, Nakaguchi H, Nagashima T (2006) Analyses of the factors influencing bone graft infection after delayed cranioplasty. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 148(5):535–540

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Erman T, Demirhindi H, Göçer AI, Tuna M, Ildan F, Boyar B (2005) Risk factors for surgical site infections in neurosurgery patients with antibiotic prophylaxis. Surg Neurol 63(2):107–112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Liang W, **aofeng Y, Weiguo L, Gang S, Xuesheng Z, Fei C, Gu L (2007) Cranioplasty of large cranial defect at an early stage after decompressive craniectomy performed for severe head trauma. J Craniofac Surg 18(3):526–532

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Timmons RL (1982) Cranial defects and their repair. In: Youmans JR (ed) Neurological surgery, 2nd edn. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 2228–2250

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rish BL, Dillon JD, Meirowsky AM, Caveness WF, Mohr JP, Kistler JP, Weiss GH (1979) Cranioplasty: a review of 1030 cases of penetrating head injury. Neurosurgery 4(5):381–385

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Stiver SI, Wintermark M, Manley GT (2008) Reversible monoparesis following decompressive hemicraniectomy for traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg 109(2):245–254

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Yoshida K, Furuse M, Izawa A, Iizima N, Kuchiwaki H, Inao S (1996) Dynamics of cerebral blood flow and metabolism in patients with cranioplasty as evaluated by 133Xe CT and 31P magnetic resonance spectroscopy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 61(2):166–171

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Richaud J, Boetto S, Guell A, Lazorthes Y (1985) Effects of cranioplasty on neurological function and cerebral blood flow. Neurochirurgie 31(3):183–188

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Sakamoto S, Eguchi K, Kiura Y, Arita K, Kurisu K (2006) CT perfusion imaging in the syndrome of the sinking skin flap before and after cranioplasty. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 108(6):583–585

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Carvi y Nievas MN, Höllerhage HG (2006) Early combined cranioplasty and programmable shunt in patients with skull bone defects and CSF-circulation disorders. Neurol Res 28(2):139–144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Suzuki N, Suzuki S, Iwabuchi T (1993) Neurological improvement after cranioplasty. Analysis by dynamic CT scan. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 122(1–2):49–53

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. DECRA Trial Investigators, Cooper DJ, Rosenfeld JV, Murray L, Arabi YM, Davies AR, D’Urso P, Kossmann T, Ponsford J, Seppelt I, Reilly P, Wolfe R, Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group (2011) Decompressive craniectomy in diffuse traumatic brain injury. N Engl J Med 364(16):1493–1502

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Gooch MR, Gin GE, Kenning TJ, German JW (2009) Complications of cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy: analysis of 62 cases. Neurosurg Focus 26(6):E9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Neurosurgical Clinic, Klinikum Offenbach, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der Universität Frankfurt, Starkenburgring 66, 63069, Offenbach, Germany

    E. Archavlis

  2. Neurosurgical Clinic, Klinikum Frankfurt Hoechst, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der Universität Frankfurt, Starkenburgring 66, 63069, Offenbach, Germany

    Mario Carvi Y Nievas

Authors
  1. E. Archavlis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mario Carvi Y Nievas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Archavlis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Archavlis, E., Carvi Y Nievas, M. The impact of timing of cranioplasty in patients with large cranial defects after decompressive hemicraniectomy. Acta Neurochir 154, 1055–1062 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-012-1333-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-012-1333-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation