Log in

Prediction of Uniaxial Compressive Strength, Tensile Strength and Porosity of Sedimentary Rocks Using Sound Level Produced During Rotary Drilling

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main purpose of the study is to develop a general prediction model and to investigate the relationships between sound level produced during drilling and physical properties such as uniaxial compressive strength, tensile strength and percentage porosity of sedimentary rocks. The results were evaluated using the multiple regression analysis taking into account the interaction effects of various predictor variables. Predictor variables selected for the multiple regression model are drill bit diameter, drill bit speed, penetration rate and equivalent sound level produced during rotary drilling (L eq). The constructed models were checked using various prediction performance indices. Consequently, it is possible to say that the constructed models can be used for practical purposes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alvarez GM, Babuska R (1999) Fuzzy model for the prediction of unconfined compressive strength of rock samples. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 36:339–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradford IDR, Fuller J, Thompson PJ, Walsgrove TR (1998) Benefits of assessing the solids production risk in a North Sea reservoir using elastoplastic modeling. SPE/ISRM Eurock ‘98 held in Trondheim, Norway, pp 261–269

  • Brown ET (ed) (1981) Rock characterization testing and monitoring. In: International society for rock mechanics (ISRM) suggested methods, Pergamon, Oxford

  • Cargill JS, Shakoor A (1990) Evaluation of empirical methods for measuring the uniaxial compressive strength of rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abst 27(6):495–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmichael RS (1982) Handbook of physical properties of rocks, vol II. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake R (2004) Bench drilling techniques and equipment selection manual. Ingersol Rand, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Ersoy A, Waller MD (1995) Prediction of drill-bit performance using multivariable linear regression analysis. Trans Inst Min Metall A 104:101–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Finol J, Guo YK, **g XD (2001) A rule based fuzzy model for the prediction of petrophysical rock parameters. J Pet Sci Eng 29:97–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gokceoglu C (2002) A fuzzy triangular chart to predict the uniaxial compressive strength of Ankara agglomerates from their petrographic composition. Eng Geo 66:39–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horsrud P (2001) Estimating mechanical properties of shale from empirical correlations. SPE Drill Complet 16:68–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Jimeno CL, Jimeno EL, Carcedo FJA (1995) Drilling and blasting of rocks. Balkema, Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Jizba D (1991) Mechanical and acoustical properties of sandstones and shales. PhD thesis, Stanford University

  • Kahraman S (1999) Rotary and percussive drilling prediction using regression analysis. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 36:981–989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahraman S (2001) Evaluation of simple methods for assessing the uniaxial compressive strength of rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 38:981–994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahraman S, Balci C, Yazici S, Bilgin N (2000) Prediction of the penetration rate of rotary blast hole drilling using a new drillability index. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 37:729–743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz O, Reches Z, Roegiers JC (2000) Evaluation of mechanical rock properties using a Schmidt hammer. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 37:723–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwasniewski M (1989) Laws of brittle failure and of B–D transition in sandstones. In: Maury V, Fourmaintraux D (eds) Rock at great depth. Balkema, Brookfield, pp 45–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Lama RD, Vutukuri VS (1978) Handbook on mechanical properties of rocks, vol II. Trans Tech Publications, Clausthal, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Miklusova V, Usalova L, Ivanicova L, Krepelka F (2006) Acoustic signal—new feature in monitoring of rock disintegration process. Contrib geophys geodesy SAS 36(SI 6SGK):125–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Osanloo M (1998) Drilling methods. Sadra, Teheran

    Google Scholar 

  • Palchik V (1999) Influence of porosity and elastic modulus on uniaxial compressive strength in soft brittle porous sandstones. Rock Mech Rock Eng 32(4):303–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajesh KB, Vardhan H, Govindaraj M (2010) Estimating rock properties using sound level during drilling: field investigation. Int J Min Mineral Eng 2(3):169–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao KUM, Misra B (1998) Principles of rock drilling. Balkema, Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Serradj T (1996) Method of assessment of rock drillability incorporating the Protodyakonov index. Trans Inst Min Metall A 105:175–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh VK, Singh DP (1993) Correlation between point load index and compressive strength for quartzite rocks. Geotech Geol Eng 11(4):269–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh SP, Ladouceur M, Rouhi F (1998) Sources, implication and control of blasthole deviation. In: Proceedings of the 7th international symposium on mine planning and equipment selection, Balkema, Rotterdam

  • Thuro K (1997) Drillability prediction—geological influences in hard rack drill and blast tunneling. Geol Rundsch 86:426–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tugrul A, Zarif IH (1999) Correlation of mineralogical and textural characteristics with engineering properties of selected granitic rocks from Turkey. Eng Geol 51:303–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vardhan H, Adhikari GR, Govindaraj M (2009) Estimating rock properties using sound level during drilling. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 46(3):604–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong TF, David C, Zhu W (1997) The transition from brittle faulting to cataclastic flow in porous sandstones: mechanical deformation. J Geophys Res 102:3009–3025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz I, Yuksek AG (2008) An example of artificial neural network application for indirect estimation of rock parameters. Rock Mech Rock Eng 41(5):781–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz I, Yuksek AG (2009) Prediction of the strength and elasticity modulus of gypsum using multiple regression, ANN, ANFIS models and their comparison. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 46(4):803–810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zborovjan M, Lesso I, Dorcak L (2003) Acoustic identification of rocks during drilling process. J Acta Montanistica Slovaca 8(4):91–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L (2005) Engineering properties of rocks. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Rajesh Kumar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rajesh Kumar, B., Vardhan, H. & Govindaraj, M. Prediction of Uniaxial Compressive Strength, Tensile Strength and Porosity of Sedimentary Rocks Using Sound Level Produced During Rotary Drilling. Rock Mech Rock Eng 44, 613–620 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-011-0160-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-011-0160-7

Keywords

Navigation