SpringerLink
Log in

Estimating the Strength of Jointed Rock Masses

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Determination of the strength of jointed rock masses is an important and challenging task in rock mechanics and rock engineering. In this article, the existing empirical methods for estimating the unconfined compressive strength of jointed rock masses are reviewed and evaluated, including the jointing index methods, the joint factor methods, and the methods based on rock mass classification. The review shows that different empirical methods may produce very different estimates. Since in many cases, rock quality designation (RQD) is the only information available for describing rock discontinuities, a new empirical relation is developed for estimating rock mass strength based on RQD. The newly developed empirical relation is applied to estimate the unconfined compressive strength of rock masses at six sites and the results are compared with those from the empirical methods based on rock mass classification. The estimated unconfined compressive strength values from the new empirical relation are essentially in the middle of the estimated values from the different empirical methods based on rock mass classification. Similar to the existing empirical methods, the newly developed relation is only approximate and should be used, with care, only for a first estimate of the unconfined compressive strength of rock masses. Recommendations are provided on how to apply the newly developed relation in combination with the existing empirical methods for estimating rock mass strength in practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AASHTO (1996) Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges, 16th edn. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Alber M, Heiland J (2001) Investigation of a limestone pillar failure, part 1: geology, laboratory testing and numerical modeling. Rock Mech Rock Eng 34(3):167–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arora VK (1987) Strength and deformation behavior of jointed rocks. PhD thesis, IIT Delhi, India

  • Asef MR, Reddish DJ, Lloyd PW (2000) Rock-support interaction analysis based on numerical modeling. Geotech Geol Eng 18:23–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aydan O, Dalgiç S (1998) Prediction of deformation behavior of 3-lanes Bolu tunnels through squeezing rocks of North Anatolian fault zone (NAFZ). In: Proceedings of regional symposium on sedimentary rock engineering, Taipei, pp 228–233

  • Aydan O, Ulusay R, Kawamoto T (1997) Assessment of rock mass strength for underground excavations. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 34(3–4): paper No. 018

  • Barton N (1983) Application of Q-system and index tests to estimate shear strength and deformability of rock masses. In: Proceedings of international symposium on engineering geology and underground construction, Lisbon, Portugal, Vol 1(II), pp 51–70

  • Barton N (2002) Some new Q-value correlations to assist in site characterization and tunnel design. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 39(2):185–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton NR, Lien R, Lunde J (1974) Engineering classification of rock masses for the design of tunnel support. Rock Mech 6(4):189–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton N, Loset F, Lien R, Lunde J (1980) Application of the Q-system in design decisions. In: Bergman M (ed) Subsurface space, vol 2. Pergamon, New York, pp 553–561

  • Bhasin R, Grimstad E (1996) The use of stress–strength relationships in the assessment of tunnel stability. Tunn Underground Space Technol 11(1):93–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bieniawski ZT (1976) Rock mass classification in rock engineering. In: Bieniawski ZT (ed) Exploration for rock engineering, Proceedings of the symposium, vol 1. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 97–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Bieniawski ZT (1978) Determining rock mass deformability: experience from case histories. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 15:237–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bieniawski ZT (1989) Engineering rock mass classification: a manual. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady BHG, Brown ET (1985) Rock mechanics for underground mining. George Allen and Unwin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown ET (1993) The nature and fundamentals of rock engineering. In: Hudson JA (ed) Compressive rock engineering—principle, practice and projects, vol 1. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai M, Kaiser PK, Uno H, Tasaka Y, Minami M (2004) Estimation of rock mass deformation modulus and strength of jointed hard rock masses using the GSI system. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41:3–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coon RF, Merritt AH (1970) Predicting in situ modulus of deformation using rock quality indices. In: Determination of the in situ modulus of deformation of rock, ASTM STP 477, pp 154–173

  • Deere DU (1967) Technical description of rock cores for engineering purposes. Rock Mech Rock Eng 1:107–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Deere DU, Hendron AJ, Patton FD, Cording EJ (1967) Design of surface and near surface construction in rock. In: Proceedings of the 8th US symposium on rock mechanics—failure and breakage of rock, Minneapolis, MN, pp 237–302

  • Ebisu S, Aydan O, Komura S, Kawamoto T (1992) Comparative study on various rock mass characterization methods for surface structures. In: Proceedings of Eurock’92. Thomas Telford, London, pp 203–208

  • Edelbro C (2003) Rock mass strength—a review. Technical report 2003:16, Lulea University of Technology, ISSN 1402–1536

  • Edelbro C, Sjoberg J, Nordlund E (2006) A quantitative comparison of strength criteria for hard rock masses. Tunn Underground Space Technol 22:57–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Naqa A, Kuisi MA (2002) Engineering geological characterisation of the rock masses at Tannur Dam site, South Jordan. Environ Geol 42:817–826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner WS (1987) Design of drilled piers in the Atlantic Piedmont. In: Smith RW (ed) Foundations and excavations in decomposed rock of the Piedmont Province, GSP No. 9. ASCE, New York, pp 62–86

  • Goel RK, Jethwa JL, Paithankar AG (1995) Correlation between Barton’s Q and Bieniawski’s RMR—a new approach. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 33(2):179–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein M, Goosev B, Pyrogovsky N, Tulinov R, Turovskaya A (1966) Investigation of mechanical properties of cracked rock. In: Proceedings of the 1st ISRM Congress, vol. 1, Lisbon, pp 521–524

  • Hoek E, Brown ET (1997) Practical estimates of rock mass strength. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 34:1165–1186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E, Diederichs MS (2006) Empirical estimation of rock mass modulus. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 36:203–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E, Kaiser PK, Bawden WF (1995) Support of underground excavations in hard rock. Balkema, Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E, Marinos P, Benissi M (1998) Applicability of the geological strength index (GSI) classification for very weak and sheared rock masses—the case of Athens Schist formation. Bull Eng Geol Environ 57:151–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E, Carranza-Torres C, Corkum B (2002) Hoek–Brown failure criterion—2002 edition. In: Proceedings of 5th North American rock mechanical symposium and 17th Tunneling Association of Canada conference: NARMS-TAC 2002. Mining Innovation and Technology, Toronto, pp 267–273

  • Jade S, Sitharam TG (2003) Characterization of strength and deformation of jointed rock mass based on statistical analysis. Int J Geomech ASCE 3:43–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Justo JL, Justo E, Durand P, Azanon JM (2006) The foundation of a 40-storey tower in jointed basalt. Int J Rock Mech Geomech Abstr 43:267–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalamaras GS, Bieniawski ZT (1993) A rock mass strength concept for coal seams. In: Proceedings of 12th conference ground control in mining, Morgantown, pp 274–283

  • Kulhawy FH, Goodman RE (1987) Foundations in rock. In: Bell FG (ed) Ground engineer’s reference book. Butterworths, London, pp 55/1–13

  • Laubscher DH (1984) Design aspects and effectiveness of support system in different mining conditions. Trans Inst Min Met 93:A70–A81

    Google Scholar 

  • Laubscher DH (1990) A geomechanics classification system for the rating of rock mass in mine design. J South Afr Inst Min Metall 90(10):257–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozsan A, Akin M (2002) Engineering geological assessment of the proposed Urus Dam, Turkey. Eng Geol 66:271–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozsan A, Ocal A, Akin M, Bassarir H (2007) Engineering geological appraisal of the Sulakyurt dam site, Turkey. Bull Eng Geol Environ 66:483–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmstrom A (1995) RMi—a rock mass characterization system for rock engineering purposes. PhD thesis, University of Oslo, Norway

  • Palmstrom A (1996a) Characterizing rock masses by the RMi for use in practical rock engineering, part 1: the development of the rock mass index (RMi). Tunn Underground Space Technol 11(2):175–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmstrom A (1996b) Characterizing rock masses by the RMi for use in practical rock engineering, part 2: some practical applications of the rock mass index (RMi). Tunn Underground Space Technol 11(3):287–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Protodyakonov MM, Koifman MI (1964) Uber den Masstabseffect bei Untersuchung von Gestein und Kohle. 5. Landertreffen des Internationalen Buros fur Gebigsmechanik. Deutsche Akad Wiss, Berlin 3:97–108

  • Ramamurthy T (1993) Strength and modulus response of anisotropic rocks. In: Hudson JA (ed) Compressive rock engineering—principle, practice and projects, vol 1. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 313–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramamurthy T (1996) Stability of rock mass—eighth Indian Geotechnical Society Annual Lecture. Indian Geotech J 16:1–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramamurthy T, Arora VK (1994) Strength predictions for jointed rocks in confined and unconfined states. Int J Rock Mech Geomech Abstr 31(1):9–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramamurthy T, Rao GV, Rao KS (1985) A strength criterion for rocks. In: Proceedings of Indian geotechnical conference, vol 1, Roorkee, pp 59–64

  • Schultz RA (1996) Relative scale and the strength and deformability of rock masses. J Struct Geol 18(9):1139–1149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serafim JL, Pereira JP (1983) Consideration of the geomechanical classification of Bieniawski. In: Proceedings of international symposium on engineering geology and underground construction, Lisbon, Portugal, vol 1(II), pp 33–44

  • Sheorey PR (1997) Empirical rock failure criteria. Balkema, Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh B, Goel RK (1999) Rock mass classifications—a practical approach in civil engineering. Elsevier Ltd, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh M, Rao KS (2005) Empirical methods to estimate the strength of jointed rock masses. Eng Geol 77(1–2):127–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh B, Viladkar MN, Samadhiya NK, Mehrota VK (1997) Rock mass strength parameters mobilized in tunnels. Tunn Underground Space Technol 12(1):47–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh B, Goel RK, Mehrotra VK, Garg SK, Allu MR (1998) Effect of intermediate principal stress on strength of anisotropic rock mass. Tunn Underground Space Technol 13(1):71–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trueman R (1988) An evaluation of strata support techniques in dual life gateroads. PhD thesis, University of Wales, Cardiff

  • Vardar M (1977) Zeiteinfluss auf des Bruchverhalten des Gebriges in der Umgebung von Tunbeln. Veroff. D. Inst. F. Bodenmech. University of Karlsruhe, Heft, p 72

  • Yudhbir WL, Prinzl F (1983) An empirical failure criterion for rock masses. In: Proceedings of 5th international congress on rock mechanics, vol 1, Melbourne, pp B1–B8

  • Zhang L (2005) Engineering properties of rocks. Elsevier Ltd, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Einstein HH (2004) Using RQD to estimate the deformation modulus of rock masses. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41:337–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA

    Lianyang Zhang

Authors
  1. Lianyang Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lianyang Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, L. Estimating the Strength of Jointed Rock Masses. Rock Mech Rock Eng 43, 391–402 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-009-0065-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-009-0065-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation