Log in

Type 2 retear after arthroscopic single-row, double-row and suture bridge rotator cuff repair: a systematic review

  • General Review • SHOULDER - ARTHROSCOPY
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim/Purpose

To provide a systematic review of the literature on patterns of retear after single-row (SR), double-row (DR) and suture bridge (SB) techniques.

Methods

The PubMed and MEDLINE databases were searched for published articles reporting both repair technique and retear pattern. Studies in languages other than English, those reporting open rotator cuff repair as the index procedure, as well as animal and cadaveric studies and those which did not describe patterns of retear, were excluded. MINORS scoring system was used to quantify potential bias in each study. Retears were classified into type 1 (failure at the tendon–bone interface) and type 2 (medial cuff failure). For all studies included, number and type of retears after different repair techniques were reported and analyzed.

Results

Fourteen studies were included yielding a total of 260 rotator cuff retears. Repair technique had a significant impact on the estimated incidence rate of type 2 retear (p = .001). The estimated incidence rate of type 2 retear was 24% with SR (95% CI 14–38%), 43% with DR (95% CI 22–66%), 62% with SB (95% CI 54–70%) and 38% with SB (95% CI 23–57%).

Conclusion

Despite the lack of high-quality evidence, this study suggests that DR and SB techniques increase the risk of medial cuff failure. Modifications in surgical techniques in both DR and SB repairs can help decrease that risk.

Level of evidence

Level IV, systematic review of investigations including level IV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yamamoto A, Takagishi K, Osawa T et al (2010) Prevalence and risk factors of a rotator cuff tear in the general population. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 19(1):116–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2009.04.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Voigt C, Bosse C, Vosshenrich R, Schulz AP, Lill H (2010) Arthroscopic supraspinatus tendon repair with suture-bridging technique. Am J Sports Med 38(5):983–991. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546509359063

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Park J-Y, Lhee S-H, Oh K-S, Moon SG, Hwang J-T (2013) Clinical and ultrasonographic outcomes of arthroscopic suture bridge repair for massive rotator cuff tear. Arthroscopy 29(2):280–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2012.09.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yang J, Robbins M, Reilly J, Maerz T, Anderson K (2017) The clinical effect of a rotator cuff retear: a meta-analysis of arthroscopic single-row and double-row repairs. Am J Sports Med 45(3):733–741. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546516652900

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mazzocca AD, Millett PJ, Guanche CA, Santangelo SA, Arciero RA (2005) Arthroscopic single-row versus double-row suture anchor rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med 33(12):1861–1868. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546505279575

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim DH, ElAttrache NS, Tibone JE et al (2006) Biomechanical comparison of a single-row versus double-row suture anchor technique for rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med 34(3):407–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546505281238

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Baums MH, Spahn G, Buchhorn GH, Schultz W, Hofmann L, Klinger H-M (2012) Biomechanical and magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of a single- and double-row rotator cuff repair in an in vivo sheep model. Arthroscopy 28(6):769–777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2011.11.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Burkhart SS, Adams CR, Burkhart SS, Schoolfield JD (2009) A biomechanical comparison of 2 techniques of footprint reconstruction for rotator cuff repair: the SwiveLock-FiberChain construct versus standard double-row repair. Arthroscopy 25(3):274–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2008.09.024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ma CB, Comerford L, Wilson J, Puttlitz CM (2006) Biomechanical evaluation of arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs: double-row compared with single-row fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(2):403. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.D.02887

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Park MC, ElAttrache NS, Tibone JE, Ahmad CS, Jun B-J, Lee TQ (2007) Part I: footprint contact characteristics for a transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair technique compared with a double-row repair technique. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 16(4):461–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2006.09.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Park MC, Tibone JE, ElAttrache NS, Ahmad CS, Jun B-J, Lee TQ (2007) Part II: biomechanical assessment for a footprint-restoring transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair technique compared with a double-row repair technique. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 16(4):469–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2006.09.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Christoforetti JJ, Krupp RJ, Singleton SB, Kissenberth MJ, Cook C, Hawkins RJ (2012) Arthroscopic suture bridge transosseus equivalent fixation of rotator cuff tendon preserves intratendinous blood flow at the time of initial fixation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21(4):523–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2011.02.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cho NS, Lee BG, Rhee YG (2011) Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using a suture bridge technique: is the repair integrity actually maintained. Am J Sports Med 39(10):2108–2116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546510397171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hein J, Reilly JM, Chae J, Maerz T, Anderson K (2015) Retear rates after arthroscopic single-row, double-row, and suture bridge rotator cuff repair at a minimum of 1 year of imaging follow-up: a systematic review. Arthroscopy 31(11):2274–2281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2015.06.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hayashida K, Tanaka M, Koizumi K, Kakiuchi M (2012) Characteristic retear patterns assessed by magnetic resonance imaging after arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy 28(4):458–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2011.09.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cho NS, Yi JW, Lee BG, Rhee YG (2010) Retear patterns after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: single-row versus suture bridge technique. Am J Sports Med 38(4):664–671. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546509350081

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee KW, Seo DW, Bae KW, Choy WS (2013) Clinical and radiological evaluation after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using suture bridge technique. Clin Orthop Surg 5(4):306. https://doi.org/10.4055/cios.2013.5.4.306

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim KC, Shin HD, Cha SM, Park JY (2014) Comparisons of retear patterns for 3 arthroscopic rotator cuff repair methods. Am J Sports Med 42(3):558–565. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546514521577

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J et al (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 339:b2700

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, Kwiatkowski F, Panis Y, Chipponi J (2003) Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg 73(9):712–716

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Schwarzer G (2007) meta: an R package for meta-analysis. R News. 7(3):40–45

    Google Scholar 

  22. Higgins J, Green S (2011) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. The Cochrane Collaboration

  23. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315(7109):629–634. https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJ.315.7109.629

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Gerhardt C, Hug K, Pauly S, Marnitz T, Scheibel M (2012) Arthroscopic single-row modified mason-allen repair versus double-row suture bridge reconstruction for supraspinatus tendon tears. Am J Sports Med 40(12):2777–2785. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546512462123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Neyton L, Godenèche A, Nové-Josserand L, Carrillon Y, Cléchet J, Hardy MB (2013) Arthroscopic suture-bridge repair for small to medium size supraspinatus tear: healing rate and retear pattern. Arthroscopy 29(1):10–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2012.06.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tanaka M, Hayashida K, Kobayashi A, Kakiuchi M (2015) Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with absorbable sutures in the medial-row anchors. Arthroscopy 31(11):2099–2105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2015.04.094

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Trantalis JN, Boorman RS, Pletsch K, Lo IKY (2008) Medial rotator cuff failure after arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy 24(6):727–731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2008.03.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Virk MS, Bruce B, Hussey KE et al (2017) Biomechanical performance of medial row suture placement relative to the musculotendinous junction in transosseous equivalent suture bridge double-row rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy 33(2):242–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2016.06.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kullar RS, Reagan JM, Kolz CW, Burks RT, Henninger HB (2015) Suture placement near the musculotendinous junction in the supraspinatus: implications for rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med 43(1):57–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546514553091

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Yamakado K, Katsuo S, Mizuno K, Arakawa H, Hayashi S (2010) Medial-row failure after arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy 26(3):430–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2009.07.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Rhee YG, Cho NS, Parke CS (2012) Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using modified mason-allen medial row stitch. Am J Sports Med 40(11):2440–2447. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546512459170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hug K, Gerhardt C, Haneveld H, Scheibel M (2015) Arthroscopic knotless-anchor rotator cuff repair: a clinical and radiological evaluation. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthosc. 23(9):2628–2634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3026-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Stahnke K, Nikulka C, Diederichs G, Haneveld H, Scheibel M, Gerhardt C (2016) Serial MRI evaluation following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in double-row technique. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136(5):665–672. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-016-2409-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yehia H. Bedeir.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (TIFF 1131 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bedeir, Y.H., Schumaier, A.P., Abu-Sheasha, G. et al. Type 2 retear after arthroscopic single-row, double-row and suture bridge rotator cuff repair: a systematic review. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 29, 373–382 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-018-2306-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-018-2306-8

Keywords

Navigation