SpringerLink
Log in

Construct and predictive validity of the German Örebro questionnaire short form for psychosocial risk factor screening of patients with low back pain

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Recognizing patients at risk of develo** chronic low back pain is essential for targeted interventions. One of the best researched screening instruments for this purpose is the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire (ÖMSPQ). This work addresses psychometric properties of the German ÖMSPQ short form and its construct and prognostic validity.

Methods

Analyses are based on a cluster-randomized trial assessing a risk tailored intervention for patients consulting for low back pain in 35 general practices. A total of 360 patients consulting for acute and sub-acute back pain, aged 20–60 years, were included. All patients received a 10-item German short version of the ÖMSPQ, and other generic instruments (Graded Chronic Pain Scale, Patient Health Questionnaire-Depression, Hannover Functional Ability Questionnaire, Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire). The construct validity was assessed based on the factorial structure of the items and correlations with generic instruments. The area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity were calculated as measures of prognostic validity.

Results

ÖMSPQ items belonging to the same subscale correlated highest among each other. The internal consistency of the ÖMSPQ items was 0.80 (Cronbach’s α). The factorial structure corresponds with theoretic expectations. ÖMSPQ subscales on pain related disability, depression, and fear-avoidance beliefs correlated highest with their counterpart generic scales. The AUC for three ÖMSPQ-based prediction models ranged from 0.77 to 0.81.

Conclusions

Our results support a satisfactory factorial and prognostic validity of the German short ÖMSPQ. The instrument may guide the provision of targeted interventions. Further research should link it to targeted treatments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Airaksinen O, Brox JI, Cedraschi C, Hildebrandt J, Klaber-Moffett J, Kovacs F, Mannion AF, Reis S, Staal JB, Ursin H, Zanoli G (2006) Chapter 4. European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain. EurSpine J 15 Suppl 2:S192–S300

  2. (BÄK) B, (KBV) KB, (AWMF). AdWMF (2010) Nationale VersorgungsLeitlinie Kreuzschmerz—Langfassung. Version 1.0. 2010. http://www.versorgungsleitlinien.de/themen/kreuzschmerz. Accessed 4.5.2014

  3. Pillastrini P, Gardenghi I, Bonetti F, Capra F, Guccione A, Mugnai R, Violante FS (2012) An updated overview of clinical guidelines for chronic low back pain management in primary care. Joint Bone Spine 79:176–185. doi:10.1016/j.jbspin.2011.03.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. van der Windt D, Hay E, Jellema P, Main C (2008) Psychosocial interventions for low back pain in primary care: lessons learned from recent trials. Spine 33:81–89. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815e39f9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hill JC, Whitehurst DG, Lewis M, Bryan S, Dunn KM, Foster NE, Konstantinou K, Main CJ, Mason E, Somerville S, Sowden G, Vohora K, Hay EM (2011) Comparison of stratified primary care management for low back pain with current best practice (STarT Back): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 378:1560–1571. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60937-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Kent P, Mirkhil S, Keating J, Buchbinder R, Manniche C, Albert HB (2014) The concurrent validity of brief screening questions for anxiety, depression, social isolation, catastrophization and fear of movement in people with low back pain. Clin J Pain 30:479–489. doi:10.1097/AJP.0000000000000010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Linton SJ, Hallden K (1998) Can we screen for problematic back pain? A screening questionnaire for predicting outcome in acute and subacute back pain. Clin J Pain 14:209–215

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sattelmayer M, Lorenz T, Roder C, Hilfiker R (2012) Predictive value of the Acute Low Back Pain Screening Questionnaire and the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire for persisting problems. Eur Spine J 21(Suppl 6):S773–S784. doi:10.1007/s00586-011-1910-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Boersma K, Linton SJ (2005) Screening to identify patients at risk: profiles of psychological risk factors for early intervention. Clin J Pain 21:38–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gabel CP, Burkett B, Melloh M (2013) The shortened Orebro Musculoskeletal Screening Questionnaire: evaluation in a work-injured population. Man Ther 18:378–385. doi:10.1016/j.math.2013.01.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Linton SJ, Nicholas M, MacDonald S (2011) Development of a short form of the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:1891–1895. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f8f775

  12. Hill JC, Dunn KM, Lewis M, Mullis R, Main CJ, Foster NE, Hay EM (2008) A primary care back pain screening tool: identifying patient subgroups for initial treatment. Arthritis Rheum 59:632–641

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hill JC, Dunn KM, Main CJ, Hay EM (2010) Subgrou** low back pain: a comparison of the STarT Back Tool with the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire. Eur J Pain 14(1):83–89

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Neubauer E, Junge A, Pirron P, Seemann H, Schiltenwolf M (2006) HKF-R 10—Screening for predicting chronicity in acute low back pain (LBP): a prospective clinical trial. Eur J Pain 10:559–566

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hasenbring M, Marienfeld G, Kuhlendahl D, Soyka D (1994) Risk factors of chronicity in lumbar disc patients. A prospective investigation of biologic, psychologic, and social predictors of therapy outcome. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 19:2759–2765

  16. Wideman TH, Hill JC, Main CJ, Lewis M, Sullivan MJ, Hay EM (2012) Comparing the responsiveness of a brief, multidimensional risk screening tool for back pain to its unidimensional reference standards: the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. Pain 153:2182–2191. doi:10.1016/j.pain.2012.06.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schmidt CO, Chenot JF, Pfingsten M, Fahland RA, Lindena G, Marnitz U, Pfeifer K, Kohlmann T (2010) Assessing a risk tailored intervention to prevent disabling low back pain-protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial. BMC MusculoskeletDisord 11:5. doi:10.1186/1471-2474-11-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Linton SJ, Boersma K (2003) Early identification of patients at risk of develo** a persistent back problem: the predictive validity of the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire. Clin J Pain 19:80–86

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Von Korff M, Ormel J, Keefe F, Dworkin SF (1992) Grading the severity of chronic pain. Pain 50:133–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gräfe K, Zipfel S, Herzog W, Löwe B (2004) Screening of psychiatric disorders with the PHQ-D. Results of a German validation study. Diagnostica 50:171–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kohlmann T, Raspe H (1996) Hannover Functional Questionnaire in ambulatory diagnosis of functional disability caused by backache. Rehabilitation 35:I–VIII

  22. Pfingsten M (2004) Fear avoidance beliefs in patients with back pain. Psychometric properties of the German version of the FABQ. Schmerz 18:17–27

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD (1996) A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 34:220–233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nicholas MK, Linton SJ, Watson PJ, Main CJ, Decade of the Flags” Working G (2011) Early identification and management of psychological risk factors (“yellow flags”) in patients with low back pain: a reappraisal. Phys Ther 91:737–753. doi:10.2522/ptj.20100224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Auvinen JP, Paananen MV, Tammelin TH, Taimela SP, Mutanen PO, Zitting PJ, Karppinen JI (2009) Musculoskeletal pain combinations in adolescents. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:1192–1197. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a401df

  26. Ramond-Roquin A, Bouton C, Gobin-Tempereau AS, Airagnes G, Richard I, Roquelaure Y, Huez JF (2014) Interventions focusing on psychosocial risk factors for patients with non-chronic low back pain in primary care–a systematic review. Fam Pract 31:379–388. doi:10.1093/fampra/cmu008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Becker A, Leonhardt C, Kochen MM, Keller S, Wegscheider K, Baum E, Donner-Banzhoff N, Pfingsten M, Hildebrandt J, Basler HD, Chenot JF (2008) Effects of two guideline implementation strategies on patient outcomes in primary care: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Spine 33:473–480

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Schmidt CO, Raspe H, Pfingsten M, Hasenbring M, Basler HD, Eich W, Kohlmann T (2007) Back pain in the German adult population. Prevalence, severity, and sociodemographic correlates in a multi-regional survey. Spine 32:2005–2011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hill JC, Dunn KM, Lewis M, Mullis R, Main CJ, Foster NE, Hay EM (2008) A primary care back pain screening tool: identifying patient subgroups for initial treatment. Arthritis Rheum 59:632–641. doi:10.1002/art.23563

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hallner D, Hasenbring M (2004) Classification of psychosocial risk factors (yellow flags) for the development of chronic low back and leg pain using artificial neural network. NeurosciLett 361:151–154

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The study was funded by the health services research program: chronic diseases and patient orientation by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research. Grant Nr. 01EM0113.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Community Medicine, SHIP-KEF, University Medicine Greifswald, Walther Rathenau Str. 48, 17475, Greifswald, Germany

    Carsten Oliver Schmidt

  2. Institute for Community Medicine, Methods of Community Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Walther Rathenau Str. 48, 17475, Greifswald, Germany

    T. Kohlmann

  3. Schmerztagesklinik und Ambulanz, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Robert Koch Str. 40, 37075, Göttingen, Germany

    M. Pfingsten

  4. Clara Institute, Kleinmachnow, Clara-Zetkin-Str. 34, 14532, Kleinmachnow, Germany

    G. Lindena

  5. Institute of Sport Science and Sport, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Gebbertstrasse 123b, 91058, Erlangen, Germany

    K. Pfeifer

  6. Department of General Practice, Institute for Community Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Fleischmannstr. 42-44, 17475, Greifswald, Germany

    J. F. Chenot

  7. Department of General Practice, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany

    U. Marnitz

  8. Spine Center Berlin, Markgrafenstraße 19, 14169, Berlin, Germany

    U. Marnitz

Authors
  1. Carsten Oliver Schmidt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. T. Kohlmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Pfingsten
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. G. Lindena
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. U. Marnitz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. K. Pfeifer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. J. F. Chenot
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carsten Oliver Schmidt.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None of the authors has any potential conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schmidt, C.O., Kohlmann, T., Pfingsten, M. et al. Construct and predictive validity of the German Örebro questionnaire short form for psychosocial risk factor screening of patients with low back pain. Eur Spine J 25, 325–332 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4196-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4196-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation