Log in

A randomized comparison of different doses of intrathecal levobupivacaine combined with fentanyl for elective cesarean section: prospective, double-blinded study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Anesthesia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Levobupivacaine may produce a sensory and motor block different from that produced by bupivacaine, which is the most popular local anesthetic in parturients undergoing cesarean section. The aim of this study was to investigate the block characteristics, the clinical efficacy, surgeon and patient satisfaction, and hemodynamic effects of using different doses of intrathecal plain levobupivacaine combined with fentanyl.

Methods

One hundred twenty women undergoing elective cesarean section with a combined spinal–epidural technique were enrolled. The parturients were randomly assigned to receive one of the following: levobupivacaine 5 mg (group 5), 7.5 mg (group 7.5) or 10 mg (group 10), all combined with fentanyl 25, 15 or 10 μg, respectively.

Results

Anesthesia was effective in 60, 82.5 and 100% of the patients in the levobupivacaine 5, 7.5 and 10 mg groups, respectively. Levobupivacaine 10 mg provided longer durations of analgesia and motor block and greater patient and surgeon satisfaction, although the incidence of hypotension was lower in groups 5 and 7.5 than in group 10 (12.5, 17.5 and 42.5%, respectively). Intraoperative epidural supplementation was higher in group 5 than in group 7.5 (40 and 17.5%, respectively), whereas no patients in group 10 were given an epidural bolus dose.

Conclusions

The incidence of hypotension was higher in the levobupivacaine 10 mg group, even though this group presented more effective anesthesia and greater patient and surgeon satisfaction compared with the levobupivacaine 5 and 7.5 mg groups. As a result, we believe that levobupivacaine 7.5 mg combined with fentanyl 15 μg is suitable for combined spinal–epidural anesthesia in elective cesarean section.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brizzi A, Greco F, Malvasi A, Valerio A, Martino V. Comparison of sequential combined spinal-epidural anesthesia and spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. Minerva Anestesiol. 2005;71:701–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Dyer RA, Joubert IA. Low-dose spinal anaesthesia for cesarean section. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2004;17:301–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Parpaglioni R, Baldassini B, Barbati G, Celleno D. Adding sufentanil to levobupivacaine or ropivacaine intrathecal anaesthesia affects the minimum local anaesthetic dose required. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009;53:1214–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Goel S, Bhardwaj N, Grover VK. Intrathecal fentanyl added to intrathecal bupivacaine for day case surgery: a randomized study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2003;20:294–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee YY, Muchhal K, Chan CK, Cheung ASP. Levobupivacaine and fentanyl for spinal anaesthesia: a randomized trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2005;22:899–903.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kuusniemi KS, Pihlajamäki KK, Pitkänen MT, Helenius HY, Kirvelä OA. The use of bupivacaine and fentanyl for spinal anesthesia for urologic surgery. Anesth Analg. 2000;91:1452–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Glaser C, Marhofer P, Zimpfer G, Heinz MT, Sitzwohl C, Kapral S, Schindler I. Levobupivacaine versus racemic bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2002;94:194–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gautier P, De Kock M, Huberty L, Demir T, Izydorczic M, Vanderick B. Comparison of the effects of intrathecal ropivacaine, levobupivacaine, and bupivacaine for caesarean section. Br J Anaesth. 2003;91:684–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Casati A, Putzu M. Bupivacaine, levobupivacaine and ropivacaine: are they clinically different? Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2005;19:247–68.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. McClellan KJ, Spencer CM. Levobupivacaine. Drugs. 1998;56:355–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Coppejans HC, Vercauteren MP. Low-dose combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery: a comparison of three plain local anesthetics. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 2006;57:39–43.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cuvas O, Basar H, Yeygel A, Turkyilmaz E, Sunay MM. Spinal anesthesia for transurethral resection operation: levobupivacaine with or without fentanyl. Middle East Anesthesiol. 2010;20:547–52.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bremerich DH, Kuschel S, Fetsch N, Zwissler B, Byhahn C, Meininger D. Levobupivacaine for parturients undergoing elective caesarean delivery. A dose-finding investigation. Anaesthesist. 2007;56:772–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kansal A, Mohta M, Sethi AK, Tyagi A, Kumar P. Randomized trial of intravenous infusion of ephedrine or mephentermine for management of hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Anaesthesia. 2005;60:28–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Erdil F, Bulut S, Demirbilek S, Gedik E, Gulhas N, Ersoy MO. The effects of intrathecal levobupivacaine and bupivacaine in the elderly. Anaesthesia. 2009;64:942–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hocking G, Wildsmith JAW. Intrathecal drug spread. Br J Anaesth. 2004;93:568–78.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Luck JF, Fettes PDW, Wildsmith JAW. Spinal anaesthesia for elective surgery: a comparison of hyperbaric solutions of racemic bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine. Br J Anaesth. 2008;101:705–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sen H, Purtuloglu T, Sızlan A, Yanarates O, Ates F, Gundu I, Ozkan S, Dagli G. Comparison of intrathecal hyperbaric and isobaric levobupivacaine in urological surgery. Minerva Anesthesiol. 2010;76:24–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Van Gessel EF, Forster A, Schweizer A, Gamulin Z. Comparison of hypobaric, hyperbaric, and isobaric solutions of bupivacaine during continuous spinal anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 1991;72:779–84.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Khaw KS, Ngan Kee WD, Wong M, Ng F, Lee A. Spinal ropivacaine for cesarean delivery: a comparison of hyperbaric and plain solutions. Anesth Analg. 2002;94:680–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Coppejans HC, Hendrickx E, Goossens J, Vercauteren MP. The sitting versus right lateral position during combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery: block characteristics and severity of hypotension. Anesth Analg. 2006;102:243–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Milligan KR. Recent advances in local anaesthetics for spinal anaesthesia. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2004;21:837–47.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Dahlgren G, Hultstrand C, Jakobsson J, Norman M, Eriksson EW, Martin H. Intrathecal sufentanil, fentanyl, or placebo added to bupivacaine for cesarean section. Anesth Analg. 1997;85:1288–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Cuvas O, Gulec H, Karaaslan M, Basar H. The use of low dose plain solutions of local anaesthetic agents for spinal anaesthesia in the prone position: bupivacaine compared with levobupivacaine. Anaesthesia. 2009;64:14–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Leo S, Sng BL, Lim Y, Sia ATH. A randomized comparison of low doses of hyperbaric bupivacaine in combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg. 2009;109:1600–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ben David B, Miller G, Gavriel R, Gurevitch A. Low-dose bupivacaine-fentanyl spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2000;25:235–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Camorcia M, Capogna G, Beritta C. The relative potencies for motor block after intrathecal ropivacaine, levobupivacaine, and bupivacaine. Anesth Analg. 2007;104:904–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Guasch E, Gilsanz F, Diez J, Alsina E. Maternal hypotension with low doses of spinal bupivacaine or levobupivacaine and epidural volume expansion with saline for cesarean section. Rev Esp Anesthesiol Reanim. 2010;57:267–74.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Chu CC, Shu SS, Lin SM, Chu NW, Leu YK, Tsai SK, Lee TY. The effect of intrathecal bupivacaine with combined fentanyl in cesarean section. Acta Anaesthesiol Sin. 1995;33:149–54.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Malinovsky JM, Renaud G, Le Corre P, Charles F, Lepage JY, Malinge M, Cozian A, Bouchot O, Pinaud M. Intrathecal bupivacaine in humans: influence of volume and baricity of solutions. Anesthesiology. 1999;91:1260–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Parpaglioni R, Frigo MG, Lemma A, Sebastiani M, Barbati G, Celleno D. Minimum local anaesthetic dose (MLAD) of intrathecal levobupivacaine and ropivacaine for caesarean section. Anaesthesia. 2006;61:110–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ilkben Gunusen.

About this article

Cite this article

Gunusen, I., Karaman, S., Sargin, A. et al. A randomized comparison of different doses of intrathecal levobupivacaine combined with fentanyl for elective cesarean section: prospective, double-blinded study. J Anesth 25, 205–212 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-011-1097-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-011-1097-4

Keywords

Navigation