Abstract
Purpose
Levobupivacaine may produce a sensory and motor block different from that produced by bupivacaine, which is the most popular local anesthetic in parturients undergoing cesarean section. The aim of this study was to investigate the block characteristics, the clinical efficacy, surgeon and patient satisfaction, and hemodynamic effects of using different doses of intrathecal plain levobupivacaine combined with fentanyl.
Methods
One hundred twenty women undergoing elective cesarean section with a combined spinal–epidural technique were enrolled. The parturients were randomly assigned to receive one of the following: levobupivacaine 5 mg (group 5), 7.5 mg (group 7.5) or 10 mg (group 10), all combined with fentanyl 25, 15 or 10 μg, respectively.
Results
Anesthesia was effective in 60, 82.5 and 100% of the patients in the levobupivacaine 5, 7.5 and 10 mg groups, respectively. Levobupivacaine 10 mg provided longer durations of analgesia and motor block and greater patient and surgeon satisfaction, although the incidence of hypotension was lower in groups 5 and 7.5 than in group 10 (12.5, 17.5 and 42.5%, respectively). Intraoperative epidural supplementation was higher in group 5 than in group 7.5 (40 and 17.5%, respectively), whereas no patients in group 10 were given an epidural bolus dose.
Conclusions
The incidence of hypotension was higher in the levobupivacaine 10 mg group, even though this group presented more effective anesthesia and greater patient and surgeon satisfaction compared with the levobupivacaine 5 and 7.5 mg groups. As a result, we believe that levobupivacaine 7.5 mg combined with fentanyl 15 μg is suitable for combined spinal–epidural anesthesia in elective cesarean section.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00540-011-1097-4/MediaObjects/540_2011_1097_Fig1_HTML.gif)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brizzi A, Greco F, Malvasi A, Valerio A, Martino V. Comparison of sequential combined spinal-epidural anesthesia and spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. Minerva Anestesiol. 2005;71:701–9.
Dyer RA, Joubert IA. Low-dose spinal anaesthesia for cesarean section. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2004;17:301–8.
Parpaglioni R, Baldassini B, Barbati G, Celleno D. Adding sufentanil to levobupivacaine or ropivacaine intrathecal anaesthesia affects the minimum local anaesthetic dose required. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009;53:1214–20.
Goel S, Bhardwaj N, Grover VK. Intrathecal fentanyl added to intrathecal bupivacaine for day case surgery: a randomized study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2003;20:294–7.
Lee YY, Muchhal K, Chan CK, Cheung ASP. Levobupivacaine and fentanyl for spinal anaesthesia: a randomized trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2005;22:899–903.
Kuusniemi KS, Pihlajamäki KK, Pitkänen MT, Helenius HY, Kirvelä OA. The use of bupivacaine and fentanyl for spinal anesthesia for urologic surgery. Anesth Analg. 2000;91:1452–6.
Glaser C, Marhofer P, Zimpfer G, Heinz MT, Sitzwohl C, Kapral S, Schindler I. Levobupivacaine versus racemic bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2002;94:194–8.
Gautier P, De Kock M, Huberty L, Demir T, Izydorczic M, Vanderick B. Comparison of the effects of intrathecal ropivacaine, levobupivacaine, and bupivacaine for caesarean section. Br J Anaesth. 2003;91:684–9.
Casati A, Putzu M. Bupivacaine, levobupivacaine and ropivacaine: are they clinically different? Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2005;19:247–68.
McClellan KJ, Spencer CM. Levobupivacaine. Drugs. 1998;56:355–62.
Coppejans HC, Vercauteren MP. Low-dose combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery: a comparison of three plain local anesthetics. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 2006;57:39–43.
Cuvas O, Basar H, Yeygel A, Turkyilmaz E, Sunay MM. Spinal anesthesia for transurethral resection operation: levobupivacaine with or without fentanyl. Middle East Anesthesiol. 2010;20:547–52.
Bremerich DH, Kuschel S, Fetsch N, Zwissler B, Byhahn C, Meininger D. Levobupivacaine for parturients undergoing elective caesarean delivery. A dose-finding investigation. Anaesthesist. 2007;56:772–9.
Kansal A, Mohta M, Sethi AK, Tyagi A, Kumar P. Randomized trial of intravenous infusion of ephedrine or mephentermine for management of hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Anaesthesia. 2005;60:28–34.
Erdil F, Bulut S, Demirbilek S, Gedik E, Gulhas N, Ersoy MO. The effects of intrathecal levobupivacaine and bupivacaine in the elderly. Anaesthesia. 2009;64:942–6.
Hocking G, Wildsmith JAW. Intrathecal drug spread. Br J Anaesth. 2004;93:568–78.
Luck JF, Fettes PDW, Wildsmith JAW. Spinal anaesthesia for elective surgery: a comparison of hyperbaric solutions of racemic bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine. Br J Anaesth. 2008;101:705–10.
Sen H, Purtuloglu T, Sızlan A, Yanarates O, Ates F, Gundu I, Ozkan S, Dagli G. Comparison of intrathecal hyperbaric and isobaric levobupivacaine in urological surgery. Minerva Anesthesiol. 2010;76:24–8.
Van Gessel EF, Forster A, Schweizer A, Gamulin Z. Comparison of hypobaric, hyperbaric, and isobaric solutions of bupivacaine during continuous spinal anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 1991;72:779–84.
Khaw KS, Ngan Kee WD, Wong M, Ng F, Lee A. Spinal ropivacaine for cesarean delivery: a comparison of hyperbaric and plain solutions. Anesth Analg. 2002;94:680–5.
Coppejans HC, Hendrickx E, Goossens J, Vercauteren MP. The sitting versus right lateral position during combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery: block characteristics and severity of hypotension. Anesth Analg. 2006;102:243–7.
Milligan KR. Recent advances in local anaesthetics for spinal anaesthesia. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2004;21:837–47.
Dahlgren G, Hultstrand C, Jakobsson J, Norman M, Eriksson EW, Martin H. Intrathecal sufentanil, fentanyl, or placebo added to bupivacaine for cesarean section. Anesth Analg. 1997;85:1288–93.
Cuvas O, Gulec H, Karaaslan M, Basar H. The use of low dose plain solutions of local anaesthetic agents for spinal anaesthesia in the prone position: bupivacaine compared with levobupivacaine. Anaesthesia. 2009;64:14–8.
Leo S, Sng BL, Lim Y, Sia ATH. A randomized comparison of low doses of hyperbaric bupivacaine in combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg. 2009;109:1600–5.
Ben David B, Miller G, Gavriel R, Gurevitch A. Low-dose bupivacaine-fentanyl spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2000;25:235–9.
Camorcia M, Capogna G, Beritta C. The relative potencies for motor block after intrathecal ropivacaine, levobupivacaine, and bupivacaine. Anesth Analg. 2007;104:904–7.
Guasch E, Gilsanz F, Diez J, Alsina E. Maternal hypotension with low doses of spinal bupivacaine or levobupivacaine and epidural volume expansion with saline for cesarean section. Rev Esp Anesthesiol Reanim. 2010;57:267–74.
Chu CC, Shu SS, Lin SM, Chu NW, Leu YK, Tsai SK, Lee TY. The effect of intrathecal bupivacaine with combined fentanyl in cesarean section. Acta Anaesthesiol Sin. 1995;33:149–54.
Malinovsky JM, Renaud G, Le Corre P, Charles F, Lepage JY, Malinge M, Cozian A, Bouchot O, Pinaud M. Intrathecal bupivacaine in humans: influence of volume and baricity of solutions. Anesthesiology. 1999;91:1260–6.
Parpaglioni R, Frigo MG, Lemma A, Sebastiani M, Barbati G, Celleno D. Minimum local anaesthetic dose (MLAD) of intrathecal levobupivacaine and ropivacaine for caesarean section. Anaesthesia. 2006;61:110–5.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Gunusen, I., Karaman, S., Sargin, A. et al. A randomized comparison of different doses of intrathecal levobupivacaine combined with fentanyl for elective cesarean section: prospective, double-blinded study. J Anesth 25, 205–212 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-011-1097-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-011-1097-4