Abstract
This paper proposes the application of neuro-wavelet technique for modeling daily suspended sediment–discharge relationship. The neuro-wavelet models are obtained by combining two methods, artificial neural networks (ANN) and discrete wavelet transform. The accuracy of the neuro-wavelet and the ANN models is compared with each other in suspended sediment load estimation. The daily streamflow and suspended sediment data from two stations on Tongue River in Montana are used as case studies. The comparison results reveal that the suggested model could increase the estimation accuracy.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00531-009-0460-2/MediaObjects/531_2009_460_Fig1_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00531-009-0460-2/MediaObjects/531_2009_460_Fig2_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00531-009-0460-2/MediaObjects/531_2009_460_Fig3_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00531-009-0460-2/MediaObjects/531_2009_460_Fig4_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00531-009-0460-2/MediaObjects/531_2009_460_Fig5_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00531-009-0460-2/MediaObjects/531_2009_460_Fig6_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00531-009-0460-2/MediaObjects/531_2009_460_Fig7_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00531-009-0460-2/MediaObjects/531_2009_460_Fig8_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00531-009-0460-2/MediaObjects/531_2009_460_Fig9_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00531-009-0460-2/MediaObjects/531_2009_460_Fig10_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00531-009-0460-2/MediaObjects/531_2009_460_Fig11_HTML.gif)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anctil F, Tape DG (2004) An exploration of artificial neural network rainfall-runoff forecasting combined with wavelet decomposition. J Environ Eng Sci 3:S121–S128
Antunes CM, Oliveira AL (2001) In: Proceedings KDD workshop on temporal data mining, pp 1–13
Aussem A, Campbell J, Murtagh F (1998) Wavelet-based feature extraction and decomposition strategies for financial forecasting. J Comput Intell Finance 6(2):5–12
Bae D-H, Jeong DM, Kim G (2007) Monthly dam inflow forecasts using weather forecasting information and neuro-fuzzy technique. Hydrol Sci J 52(1):99–113. doi:10.1623/hysj.52.1.99
Bose NK, Liang P (1996) Neural networks fundamentals with graphs, algorithms, and application. first edn. Prentice-Hall, Inc., New York
Campolo M, Soldati A (2003) Artificial neural network approach to flood forecasting in the River Arno. Hydrol Sci J 48(3):381–398. doi:10.1623/hysj.48.3.381.45286
Chang F-J, Chen Y-C (2001) A counterpropagation fuzzy-neural network modeling approach to real time streamflow prediction. J Hydrol (Amst) 245:153–164. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00350-X
Cigizoglu HK (2003) Estimation, forecasting and extrapolation of river flows by artificial neural networks. Hydrol Sci J 48(3):349–361. doi:10.1623/hysj.48.3.349.45288
Cigizoglu HK (2004) Estimation and forecasting of daily suspended sediment data by multi layer perceptrons. Adv Water Resour 27:185–195. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2003.10.003
Cigizoglu HK, Kisi O (2005) Flow prediction by three back propagation techniques using k-fold partitioning of neural network training data. Nord Hydrol 36(1):49–64
Cigizoglu HK, Kisi O (2006) Methods to improve the neural network performance in suspended sediment estimation. J Hydrol (Amst) 317:221–238. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.05.019
Cobaner M, Seckin G, Kisi O (2008) Initial assessment of bridge backwater using artificial neural network approach. Can J Civ Eng 35(5):500–510. doi:10.1139/L07-142
Coulibaly P, Burn HD (2004) Wavelet analysis of variability in annual Canadian streamflows. Water Resour Res 40:W03105
Dabuechies I (1990) The wavelet transform, time–frequency localization and signal analysis. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 36(5)
Giustolisi O, Laucelli D (2005) Improving generalization of artificial neural networks in rainfall–runoff modelling. Hydrol Sci J 50(3):439–457. doi:10.1623/hysj.50.3.439.65025
Guldal V, Muftuoglu RF (2001) 2D unit sediment graph theory. J Hydrol Eng 6(2):132–140. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2001)6:2(132)
Hagan MT, Menhaj MB (1994) Training feed forward networks with the Marquaradt algorithm. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 6:861–867
Haykin S (1994) Neural networks: a comprehensive foundation. IEEE press, New York
Hu TS, Lam KC, Thomas NGS (2005) A modified neural network for improving river flow prediction. Hydrol Sci J 50(2):299–318. doi:10.1623/hysj.50.2.299.61794
Jain SK (2001) Development of integrated sediment rating curves using ANNs. J Hydraul Eng 127(1):30–37. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2001)127:1(30)
Jain SK, Das D, Srivastava DK (1999) Application of ANN for reservoir inflow prediction and operation. J Water Res Plann Manage ASCE 125(5):263–271. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1999)125:5(263)
Jayawardena AW, Xu PC, Tsang FL, Li WK (2006) Determining the structure of a radial basis function network for prediction of nonlinear hydrological time series. Hydrol Sci J 51(1):21–44. doi:10.1623/hysj.51.1.21
Kaboudan M (2005) Extended daily exchange rates forecasts using wavelet temporal resolutions. N Math Nat Comput 1(1):79–107. doi:10.1142/S1793005705000056
Kang KW, Park CY, Kim JH (1993) Neural network and its application to rainfall–runoff forecasting. Korean J Hydrosci 4:1–9
Karunanithi N, Grenney WJ, Whitley D, Bovee K (1994) Neural networks for river flow prediction. J Comp Civ Eng ASCE 8(2):201–220. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(1994)8:2(201)
Kim TW, Valdes JB (2003) Nonlinear model for drought forecasting based on a conjunction of wavelet transforms and neural networks. J Hydrol Eng ASCE 6:319–328
Kisi O (2004a) River flow modeling using artificial neural networks. J Hydrol Eng 9(1):60–63. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2004)9:1(60)
Kisi O (2004b) Multi-layer perceptrons with Levenberg-Marquardt optimization algorithm for suspended sediment concentration prediction and estimation. Hydrol Sci J 49(6):1025–1040. doi:10.1623/hysj.49.6.1025.55720
Kisi O (2005a) Daily river flow forecasting using artificial neural networks and auto-regressive models. Turk J Eng Environ Sci 29:9–20
Kisi O (2005b) Suspended sediment estimation using neuro-fuzzy and neural network approaches. Hydrol Sci J 50(4):683–696. doi:10.1623/hysj.2005.50.4.683
Kisi O, Cigizoglu HK (2007) Comparison of different ANN techniques in river flow prediction. Civ Eng Environ Syst 24(3):211–231
Kothyari UC, Tiwari AK, Singh R (1997) Estimation of temporal variation of sediment yield from small catchments through the kinematic method. J Hydrol (Amst) 203:39–57. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(97)00084-X
Kucuk M, Agiralioglu N (2006) Wavelet regression techniques for streamflow predictions. J Appl Stat 33(9):943–960. doi:10.1080/02664760600744298
Ma PY (2006) A fresh engineering approach for the forecast of financial index volatility and hedging strategies, PhD Thesis, Quebec University, Montreal, Canada
Makridakis S, Wheelwright SC, McGee VE (1983) Forecasting: methods and applications. Wiley, New York, p 923
Mallat SG (1989) A theory for multi resolution signal decomposition: the wavelet representation. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 11(7):674–693. doi:10.1109/34.192463
McBean EA, Al-Nassri S (1988) Uncertainty in suspended sediment transport curves. J Hydrol Eng 114(1):63–74. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1988)114:1(63)
Partal T, Kucuk M (2006) Long-term trend analysis using discrete wavelet components of annual precipitations measurements in Marmara region (Turkey). Phys Chem Earth 31:1189–1200
Refsgaard JC (1997) Parameterisation, calibration and validation of distributed hydrological models. J Hydrol (Amst) 198:69–97. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(96)03329-X
Saad M, Bigras P, Turgeon A, Duquette R (1996) Fuzzy learning decomposition for the scheduling of hydroelectric power systems. Water Resour Res 32(1):179–186. doi:10.1029/95WR02971
Shamseldin AY (1997) Application of a neural network technique to rainfall–runoff modelling. J Hydrol (Amst) 199:272–294. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(96)03330-6
Smith M (1996) Neural networks for statistical modeling. International Thomson Computer Press, Boston, ISBN 1-850-32842-0
Smith LC, Turcotte DL, Isacks B (1998) Stream flow characterization and feature detection using a discrete wavelet transform. Hydrol Process 12:233–249
Solomatine DP, Dulal KN (2003) Model trees as an alternative to neural networks in rainfall–runoff modelling. Hydrol Sci J 48(3):399–411. doi:10.1623/hysj.48.3.399.45291
Sudheer KP, Gosain AK, Rangan DM, Saheb SM (2002) Modelling evaporation using an artificial neural network algorithm. Hydrol Process 16:3189–3202. doi:10.1002/hyp.1096
Tayfur G (2002) Artificial neural networks for sheet sediment transport. Hydrol Sci J 47(6):879–892
Tokar AS, Johnson PA (1999) Rainfall–runoff modeling using artificial neural networks. J Hydrol Eng 4(3):232–239. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(1999)4:3(232)
Torrence C, Compo GP (1998) A practical guide to wavelet analysis. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 79(1):61–78. doi:10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079<0061:APGTWA>2.0.CO;2
Wang W, Ding J (2003) Wavelet network model and its application to the prediction of the hydrology. Nat Sci 1(1):67–71
Wicks JM, Bathurst JC (1996) SHESED: a physically based, distributed erosion and sediment yield component for the SHE hydrological modeling system. J Hydrol 175:213–238. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(96)80012-6
Zhang BL, Dong ZY (2001) An adaptive neural-wavelet model for short term load forecasting. Electric Power Syst Res 59:121–129. doi:10.1016/S0378-7796(01)00138-9
Zheng T, Girgis AA, Makram EB (2000) A hybrid wavelet-Kalman filter method for load forecasting. Electric Power Syst Res 54:11–17. doi:10.1016/S0378-7796(99)00063-2
Acknowledgments
The data used in this study were downloaded from the web server of the USGS. The author wishes to thank the staff of the USGS who are associated with data observation, processing, and management of USGS websites.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kişi, Ö. Daily suspended sediment estimation using neuro-wavelet models. Int J Earth Sci (Geol Rundsch) 99, 1471–1482 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00531-009-0460-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00531-009-0460-2