Abstract
The ride comfort of bus passengers is a critical factor that is recognised to attract greater ridership towards a sustainable public transport system. However, it is challenging to estimate bus passenger comfort onboard while travelling due to the complex non-linear interaction among various factors. A practicable method to collect real-time comfort ratings by passengers is also not readily available. This study developed an artificial neural network (ANN) model with three layers to precisely estimate real-time ride comfort of bus passengers. The inputs are vehicle-related parameters (speed, acceleration and jerk), passenger-related features (posture, location, facing, gender, age, weight and height), ride comfort index in ISO 2631-1997 (vibration dose value and maximum transient vibration value), and output is passenger rating (collected from a specialised mobile application). The ANN model provided a satisfactory performance and good correlation between inputs and output with an average MSE = 0.03 and R-value = 0.83, respectively. Sensitivity analysis was also conducted to quantify the relative contribution of each variable in the ANN model, revealing similar contributions among all influencing factors in the range of 4–6%. On average, passenger-related factors contribute slightly higher than vehicle-related factors to the ride comfort estimation based on the connection weight approach. The development of ANN model which can precisely estimate bus ride comfort is important as a considerable amount of machine learning and artificial intelligence are utilised to guide autonomous bus (AB). The present findings can help AB designers and engineers in improving AB technology to achieve a higher level of passengers’ onboard comfort.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Nguyen T, Lechner B, Wong YD, Tan JY (2019) Bus ride index—a refined approach to evaluate road surface irregularities. Road Mater Pavement Des. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2019.1625806
Land Transport Authority (2014) Smart mobility 2030—ITS strategic plan for Singapore. Land Transport Authority, Singapore
Pessaro B (2016) Evaluation of automated vehicle evaluation technology for transit—2016 update. Center for Urban Transportation Research, University of South Florida, Tampa
Azad M, Hoseinzadeh N, Brakewood C, Cherry CR, Han LD (2019) Fully autonomous buses: a literature review and future research directions. J Adv Transp. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4603548
Rehrl K, Zankl C (2018) Digibus©: results from the first self-driving shuttle trial on a public road in Austria. Eur Trans Res Rev. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-018-0326-4
CNA (2019) Driverless electric bus launched by NTU and Volvo in “world first.” In: CNA. https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/driverless-electric-bus-launched-by-ntu-and-volvo-in-world-first-11311838. Accessed 23 Apr 2019
Rau A, Tian L, Jain M, ** the Future Together”—International Scientific Conference on Mobility and Transport. TUM, Munich, Germany
Nguyen T, **e M, Liu X, Arunachalam NR, Rau A, Lechner B, Busch F, Wong YD (2019) Platooning of autonomous public transport vehicles: the influence of ride comfort on travel delay. Sustainability 11:5237. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195237
Villagra J, Milanés V, Pérez J, Godoy J (2012) Smooth path and speed planning for an automated public transport vehicle. Robot Auton Syst 60:252–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2011.11.001
Eden G, Nanchen B, Ramseyer R, Ev F (2017) Expectation and experience: passenger acceptance of autonomous public transportation vehicles. IFIP Int Fed Inf Process 2017:360–363
Nguyen T, NguyenDinh N, Lechner B, Wong YD (2019) Insight into the lateral ride discomfort of young-adult bus passengers at multiple postures: case of Singapore. Case Stud Transp Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2019.07.002
Cieslak M, Kanarachos S, Blundell M, Diels C, Burnett M, Baxendale A (2019) Accurate ride comfort estimation combining accelerometer measurements, anthropometric data and neural networks. Neural Comput Appl. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-019-04351-1
Abduljabbar R, Dia H, Liyanage S, Bagloee SA (2019) Applications of artificial intelligence in transport: an overview. Sustainability (Switzerland). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010189
Bagloee SA, Sarvi M, Patriksson M (2017) A hybrid branch-and-bound and benders decomposition algorithm for the network design problem. Comput-Aided Civ Infrastruct Eng 32:319–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12224
Wang R, Fan S, Work DB (2016) Efficient multiple model particle filtering for joint traffic state estimation and incident detection. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 71:521–537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.08.003
Ledoux C (1997) An urban traffic flow model integrating neural networks. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 5:287–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-090X(97)00015-6
Oza N, Castle JP, Stutz J (2009) Classification of aeronautics system health and safety documents. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part C Appl Rev 39:670–680. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCC.2009.2020788
Raymond R, Sugiura T, Tsubouchi K (2011) Location recommendation based on location history and spatio-temporal correlations for an on-demand bus system. In: GIS: Proceedings of the ACM international symposium on advances in geographic information systems, 377–380. https://doi.org/10.1145/2093973.2094027
Ma J, Song C, Ceder A, Liu T, Guan W (2017) Fairness in optimizing bus-crew scheduling process. PLoS ONE 12:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187623
Chien SIJ, Ding Y, Wei C (2002) Dynamic bus arrival time prediction with artificial neural networks. J Transp Eng 128:429–438. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2002)128:5(429)
Kocić J, Jovičić N, Drndarević V (2019) An end-to-end deep neural network for autonomous driving designed for embedded automotive platforms. Sensors (Switzerland). https://doi.org/10.3390/s19092064
Nguyen T, Lechner B, Yiik Diew W (2019) Response-based methods to measure road surface irregularity: a state-of-the-art review. Eur Transp Res Rev 11:43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-019-0380-6
Heißing B, Ersoy M (2011) Ride comfort and NHV. In: Ersoy M (ed) Chassis handbook. Vieweg + Teubner, Wiesbaden
Da Silva MCG (2002) Measurements of comfort in vehicles. Meas Sci Technol 13:R41–R60
ISO2631-1:1997 (1997) Mechanical vibration and shock—evaluation of human exposure to whole body vibration (part 1: general requirrements). International Organization for Standardization, Switzerland
BS 6841:1987 (1999) Measurement and evaluation of human exposure to whole-body mechanical vibration and repeated shock. British Standards Institution, London
SAE, S. (2000) J1060: Subjective rating scale for evaluation of noise and ride comfort characteristics related to motor vehicle tires
Fard M, Lo L, Subic A, Jazar R (2014) Effects of seat structural dynamics on current ride comfort criteria. Ergonomics 57:1549–1561. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2014.934300
Elbanhawi M (2015) In the passenger seat: investigating ride comfort measures in autonomous cars. IEEE Intell Transp Syst Mag 7:4–17
Ebe K, Griffin MJ (2010) Factors affecting static seat cushion comfort. Ergonomics. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130110064685
Marianne S, Bluethner R, Seidel H (2006) Examination of perceptions (intensity, seat comfort, effort) and reaction times (brake and accelerator) during low-frequency vibration in x - or y -direction and biaxial (xy-) vibration of driver seats with activated and deactivated suspension. J Sound Vib 298:606–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2006.06.029
Turner M, Griffin MJ (2010) Motion sickness in public road transport: the effect of driver, route and vehicle. Ergonomics. https://doi.org/10.1080/001401399184730
Kolich M, Seal N, Taboun S (2004) Automobile seat comfort prediction: statistical model vs. artificial neural network. Appl Ergon 35:275–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2004.01.007
Taghavifar H, Rakheja S (2018) Supervised ANN-assisted modeling of seated body apparent mass under vertical whole body vibration. Meas J Int Meas Confed 127:78–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.05.092
Gao Y, Tang R, Liang J, Shen S, Sun H (2010) Evaluation of vehicle ride comfort based on neural network. In: Sixth international symposium on precision engineering measurements and instrumentation. p 754407
Sarawut L, Albert A, Sascha O (2012) Subjective evaluation and modeling of human ride comfort of electric vehicle using tools based on artificial neural networks. In: Proceedings of the FISITA 2012 world automotive congress. pp 1777–1785
Sarawut L, Albert A, Sascha O, Dueser T (2015) Human ride comfort prediction of drive train using modeling method based on artificial neural networks. Int J Automot Technol 16:153–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-015-0017-2
Lee H, Lee S (2009) Objective evaluation of interior noise booming in a passenger car based on sound metrics and artificial neural networks. Appl Ergon 40:860–869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2008.11.006
Wiȩcek P, Kubek D, Aleksandrowicz JH, Strózek A (2019) Framework for onboard bus comfort level predictions using the Markov chain concept. Symmetry. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11060755
Beurier G (2012) Analysis of the discomfort feeling of standing bus passengers on the Teor T1 Rouen bus lane. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 48:425–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.1022
Maternini G, Cadei M (2014) A comfort scale for standing bus passengers in relation to certain road characteristics. Transp Lett Int J Transp Res 6:136–141. https://doi.org/10.1179/1942787514y.0000000020
Babakus E, Mangold WG (1992) Adapting the servqual scale to hospital services: an empirical investigation. Health Serv Res 26:767–786
Dawes J (2008) Do data characteristics change according to the number of scale points used? An experiment using 5-point, 7-point and 10-point scales. Int J Mark Res 50:61–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/147078530805000106
Sachdev S, Verma H (2004) Relative importance of service quality dimensions: a multisectoral study. J Serv Res 4:93
AASHTO (2011) A policy on geometric design of highways and streets, 6th edn. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C.
He Y, Yan X, Wu C, Chu D, Peng L (2013) Effects of driver’s unsafe acceleration behaviors on passengers’ comfort for coach buses. Improv Multimodal Transp Syst Inf Saf Integr. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784413036.220
Barton D (2010) Guide to road design—part 3: geometric design. In: Horton MJ, Dworkin A (eds) Guide to road design, Second. Austroads Ltd, Sydney
Haykin S (2009) Neural networks and learning machines. Pearson Education, Hamilton
Gedeon TD, Wong PM, Harris D (1995) Balancing bias and variance: network topology and pattern set reduction techniques. In: Mira J, Sandoval F (eds) From natural to artificial neural computation. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 551–558
Hornik K, Stinchcombe M, White H et al (1989) Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators. Neural Netw 2:359–366
Oña J De, Garrido C (2015) Extracting the contribution of independent variables in neural network models: a new approach to handle instability. Neural Comput Appl. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-014-1573-5
Gevrey M, Dimopoulos I, Lek S (2003) Review and comparison of methods to study the contribution of variables in artificial neural network models. Ecol Model 160:249–264
Olden JD, Joy MK, Death RG (2004) An accurate comparison of methods for quantifying variable importance in artificial neural networks using simulated data. Ecol Model 178:389–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.03.013
Garson DG (1991) Interpreting neural network connection weights. AI Expert 6:47–51
Olden JD, Jackson DA (2002) Illuminating the “black box”: a randomization approach for understanding variable contributions in artificial neural networks. Ecol Model 154:135–150
Salonen AO, Haavisto N (2019) Towards autonomous transportation. Passengers’ experiences, perceptions and feelings in a driverless shuttle bus in Finland. Sustainability (Switzerland) 11:588. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030588
Acknowledgements
This work is financially supported by the Singapore National Research Foundation under its Campus for Research Excellence and Technological Enterprise (CREATE) programme.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
TN was the main initiator and author. His major contribution to the paper is as follows: study conception and design, data collection, analysis and interpretation of results, draft preparation. DQN provided discussion and solutions for ANN model. YDW has also drafted the manuscript and substantively revised it. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nguyen, T., Nguyen-Phuoc, D.Q. & Wong, Y.D. Develo** artificial neural networks to estimate real-time onboard bus ride comfort. Neural Comput & Applic 33, 5287–5299 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-05318-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-05318-3