Abstract
Precise estimation of reference evapotranspiration (ET0) is crucial for efficient agricultural water management, crop modelling, and irrigation scheduling. In recent years, the data-driven models using Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based meta-heuristics algorithms have gained the attention of researchers worldwide. In this study, we have investigated the performance of five AI-based models for ET0 estimation, including Artificial Neural Networks-Additive Regression (ANN-AR), ANN-Random Forest (ANN-RF), ANN-REPtree, ANN-M5Pruning Tree (ANN-M5P), and ANN-Bagging at New Delhi (i.e., semi-arid climate), and Srinagar (i.e., humid climate) stations and the best yielded algorithms were evaluated at the third station i.e. Ludhiana (i.e., sub-humid climate) located in Northern India. The performances indicators (i.e., Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE), and Willmott Index (WI)) of hybrid meta-heuristics algorithms were compared to FAO-56 Penman–monteith (P-M FAO-56). Results revealed that the M5P algorithm under limited climate variables (i.e., Model 1, 2, and 3) and Bagging (Model 4 and 5) acted as efficient tools in optimizing the ANN structure. Therefore, the algorithm ANN-M5P predicted ET0 values precisely under models 1, 2, and 3. While the ANN-Bagging algorithms gave better ET0 estimation under models 4 and 5 for both the selected stations. The evaluation of best hybrid algorithms under each constructed model for the Ludhiana station showed that the ANN-M5P algorithm under Model-3 outperformed the other four models (MAE = 0.730 mm/day, RMSE = 0.959 mm/day, NSE = 0.779, and WI = 0.935). The present study demonstrated that the AI-based hybrid meta-heuristics algorithms (ANN-M5P and ANN-Bagging) are promising pathways for ET0 estimation.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00477-022-02196-0/MediaObjects/477_2022_2196_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00477-022-02196-0/MediaObjects/477_2022_2196_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00477-022-02196-0/MediaObjects/477_2022_2196_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00477-022-02196-0/MediaObjects/477_2022_2196_Fig4_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00477-022-02196-0/MediaObjects/477_2022_2196_Fig5_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00477-022-02196-0/MediaObjects/477_2022_2196_Fig6_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00477-022-02196-0/MediaObjects/477_2022_2196_Fig7_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00477-022-02196-0/MediaObjects/477_2022_2196_Fig8_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00477-022-02196-0/MediaObjects/477_2022_2196_Fig9_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00477-022-02196-0/MediaObjects/477_2022_2196_Fig10_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00477-022-02196-0/MediaObjects/477_2022_2196_Fig11_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00477-022-02196-0/MediaObjects/477_2022_2196_Fig12a_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00477-022-02196-0/MediaObjects/477_2022_2196_Fig12b_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and material
Not applicable.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Abrishami N, Sepaskhah AR, Shahrokhnia MH (2019) Estimating wheat and maize daily evapotranspiration using artificial neural network. Theor Appl Climatol 135(3–4):945–958
Abyaneh HZ, Varkeshi MB, Golmohammadi G (2016) Soil temperature estimation using an artificial neural network and co-active neuro-fuzzy inference system in two different climates. Arab J Geosci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-016-2388-8
Adamala S (2018) Temperature based generalized wavelet-neural network models to estimate evapotranspiration in India. Inf Process Agric 5:149–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inpa.2017.09.004
Aghajanloo M-B, Sabziparvar A-A, Hosseinzadeh Talaee P (2013) Artificial neural network–genetic algorithm for estimation of crop evapotranspiration in a semi-arid region of Iran. Neural Comput Appl 23:1387–1393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-012-1087-y
Ajjur SB, Al-Ghamdi SG (2021) Evapotranspiration and water availability response to climate change in the middle east and North Africa. Clim Change 166:28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03122-z
Ajmera TK, Goyal MK (2012) Development of stage–discharge rating curve using model tree and neural networks: An application to Peachtree Creek in Atlanta. Expert Syst Appl 39:5702–5710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.11.101
Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration-Guidelines for computing crop water requirements-FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56. Fao, Rome 300:D05109
Allen RG, Pereira LS, Howell TA, Jensen ME (2011) Evapotranspiration information reporting: I. Factors governing measurement accuracy. Agric Water Manag 98:899–920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2010.12.015
Ayaz A, Rajesh M, Singh SK et al (2021) Estimation of reference evapotranspiration using machine learning models with limited data. AIMSGEO 7:268–290. https://doi.org/10.3934/geosci.2021016
Azhari M, Abarda A, Alaoui A et al (2020) Detection of pulsar candidates using bagging method. Procedia Comput Sci 170:1096–1101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.03.062
Bai Y, Zhang S, Bhattarai N et al (2021) On the use of machine learning based ensemble approaches to improve evapotranspiration estimates from croplands across a wide environmental gradient. Agric for Meteorol 298–299:108308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.108308
Bajirao TS, Kumar P, Kumar M et al (2021) Superiority of hybrid soft computing models in daily suspended sediment estimation in highly dynamic rivers. Sustainability (switzerland) 13:1–29. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020542
Barzkar A, Shahabi S, Niazmradi S, Madadi MR (2021) A comparative study of remote sensing and gene expression programming for estimation of evapotranspiration in four distinctive climates. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 35:1437–1452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-020-01956-0
Bharti B, Pandey A, Tripathi SK, Kumar D (2017) Modelling of runoff and sediment yield using ANN, LS-SVR, REPTree and M5 models. Hydrol Res 48:1489–1507. https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2017.153
Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Mach Learn 45:5–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324
Breiman L, Friedman J, Olshen R, Stone C (1984) Classification and regression trees. CRC Press, Florida
Chen T, Ren J (2009) Bagging for Gaussian process regression. Neurocomputing 72:1605–1610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2008.09.002
Chen Z, Zhu Z, Jiang H, Sun S (2020) Estimating daily reference evapotranspiration based on limited meteorological data using deep learning and classical machine learning methods. J Hydrol 591:125286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125286
Cutler DR, Edwards TC Jr, Beard KH et al (2007) Random forests for classification in ecology. Ecology 88:2783–2792. https://doi.org/10.1890/07-0539.1
DehghaniSanij H, Yamamoto T, Rasiah V (2004) Assessment of evapotranspiration estimation models for use in semi-arid environments. Agric Water Manag 64:91–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3774(03)00200-2
Di Nunno F, Granata F (2020) Groundwater level prediction in Apulia region (Southern Italy) using NARX neural network. Environ Res 190:110062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.110062
Dietterich TG (2000) An experimental comparison of three methods for constructing ensembles of decision trees: bagging, boosting, and randomization. Mach Learn 40:139–157. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007607513941
Ding R, Kang S, Li F et al (2010) Evaluating eddy covariance method by large-scale weighing lysimeter in a maize field of northwest China. Agric Water Manag 98:87–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2010.08.001
Doorenbos J, Pruitt WO (1977) Crop water requirements. FAO irrigation and drainage paper 24. Land and Water Development Division, FAO, Rome 144:
Elbeltagi A, Aslam MR, Mokhtar A et al (2020a) Spatial and temporal variability analysis of green and blue evapotranspiration of wheat in the Egyptian Nile Delta from 1997 to 2017. J Hydrol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125662
Elbeltagi A, Deng J, Wang K, Hong Y (2020b) Crop Water footprint estimation and modeling using an artificial neural network approach in the Nile Delta. Egypt Agricultural Water Management 235:106080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106080
Elbeltagi A, Kushwaha NL, Srivastava A, Zoof AT (2022) Chapter 5 - Artificial intelligent-based water and soil management. In: Poonia RC, Singh V, Nayak SR (eds) Deep learning for sustainable agriculture. Academic Press, Elsevier, pp 129–142
Fan J, Yue W, Wu L et al (2018) Evaluation of SVM, ELM and four tree-based ensemble models for predicting daily reference evapotranspiration using limited meteorological data in different climates of China. Agric for Meteorol 263:225–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.08.019
Fan G, Sarabandi A, Yaghoobzadeh M (2021) Evaluating the climate change effects on temperature, precipitation and evapotranspiration in eastern Iran using CMPI5. Water Supply 21:4316–4327. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2021.179
Fu JC, Huang HY, Jang JH, Huang PH (2019) River stage forecasting using multiple additive regression trees. Water Resour Manage 33:4491–4507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02357-x
Ghazi B, Jeihouni E, Kouzehgar K, Haghighi AT (2021) Assessment of probable groundwater changes under representative concentration pathway (RCP) scenarios through the wavelet–GEP model. Environ Earth Sci 80:446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-021-09746-9
Granata F (2019) Evapotranspiration evaluation models based on machine learning algorithms—A comparative study. Agric Water Manag 217:303–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.03.015
Granata F, Di Nunno F (2021a) Forecasting evapotranspiration in different climates using ensembles of recurrent neural networks. Agric Water Manag 255:107040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107040
Granata F, Di Nunno F (2021b) Artificial Intelligence models for prediction of the tide level in Venice. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 35:2537–2548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-021-02018-9
Hargreaves G, Samani Z (1982) Estimating potential evapotranspiration. J Irrig Drain Eng 108:223–230
Hastie T, Tibshirani R (1986) Generalized Additive Models. Stat Sci 6:15–51
Healey SP, Cohen WB, Yang Z et al (2018) Map** forest change using stacked generalization: An ensemble approach. Remote Sens Environ 204:717–728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.09.029
Jeihouni E, Mohammadi M, Ghazi B (2021) Response of the Shabestar Plain aquifer to climate-change scenarios through statistical and hybrid soft computing techniques. Groundw Sustain Dev 15:100649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2021.100649
Joseph KS, Ravichandran T (2012) A comparative evaluation of software effort estimation using REPTree and K* in handling with missing values. Aust J Basic Appl Sci 6:312–317
Kisi O, Sanikhani H, Zounemat-Kermani M, Niazi F (2015) Long-term monthly evapotranspiration modeling by several data-driven methods without climatic data. Comput Electron Agric 115:66–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2015.04.015
Kisi O, Keshtegar B, Zounemat-Kermani M et al (2021) Modeling reference evapotranspiration using a novel regression-based method: radial basis M5 model tree. Theoret Appl Climatol 145:639–659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-021-03645-6
Kumar N, Adeloye AJ, Shankar V, Rustum R (2020) Neural computing modelling of the crop water stress index. Agric Water Manag. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106259
Kushwaha NL, Bhardwaj A, Verma VK (2016) Hydrologic response of Takarla-Ballowal watershed in Shivalik foot-hills based on morphometric analysis using remote sensing and GIS. J Indian Water Resour Soc 36:17–25
Kushwaha NL, Rajput J, Elbeltagi A et al (2021) Data intelligence model and meta-heuristic algorithms-based pan evaporation modelling in two different agro-climatic zones: a case study from northern India. Atmosphere 12:1654. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12121654
Kushwaha NL, Rajput J, Shirsath PB et al (2022) Seasonal climate forecasts (SCFs) based risk management strategies. A case study of rainfed rice cultivation in India. J Agrometeorol. https://doi.org/10.54386/jam.v24i1.775
Laanaya F, St-Hilaire A, Gloaguen E (2017) Water temperature modelling: comparison between the generalized additive model, logistic, residuals regression and linear regression models. Hydrol Sci J 62:1078–1093. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2016.1246799
López-Urrea R, de Santa M, Olalla F, Fabeiro C, Moratalla A (2006) Testing evapotranspiration equations using lysimeter observations in a semiarid climate. Agric Water Manag 85:15–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2006.03.014
Malik A, Tikhamarine Y, Al-Ansari N et al (2021) Daily pan-evaporation estimation in different agro-climatic zones using novel hybrid support vector regression optimized by Salp swarm algorithm in conjunction with gamma test. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mech 15:1075–1094. https://doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2021.1942990
Manikumari N, Murugappan A, Vinodhini G (2017) Time series forecasting of daily reference evapotranspiration by neural network ensemble learning for irrigation system. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci 80:12069. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/80/1/012069
Maroufpoor S, Bozorg-Haddad O, Maroufpoor E (2020) Reference evapotranspiration estimating based on optimal input combination and hybrid artificial intelligent model: Hybridization of artificial neural network with grey wolf optimizer algorithm. J Hydrol 588:125060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125060
Mehdizadeh S, Behmanesh J, Khalili K (2017) Using MARS, SVM, GEP and empirical equations for estimation of monthly mean reference evapotranspiration. Comput Electron Agric 139:103–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2017.05.002
Nistor M-M, Mîndrescu M, Petrea D et al (2019) Climate change impact on crop evapotranspiration in Turkey during the 21st Century. Meteorol Appl 26:442–453. https://doi.org/10.1002/met.1774
Nourani V, Elkiran G, Abdullahi J (2020) Multi-step ahead modeling of reference evapotranspiration using a multi-model approach. J Hydrol 581:124434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124434
Poddar A, Gupta P, Kumar N et al (2021) Evaluation of reference evapotranspiration methods and sensitivity analysis of climatic parameters for sub-humid sub-tropical locations in western Himalayas (India). ISH J Hydraul Eng 27:336–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/09715010.2018.1551731
Quinlan JR (1992) Learning with Continuous Classes. In: 5th Australian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. World Scientific, pp 343–348
Rahman M, Chen N, Elbeltagi A et al (2021) Application of stacking hybrid machine learning algorithms in delineating multi-type flooding in Bangladesh. J Environ Manage 295:113086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113086
Ravazzani G, Corbari C, Morella S et al (2012) Modified hargreaves-samani equation for the assessment of reference evapotranspiration in alpine river basins. J Irrig Drain Eng 138:592–599. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000453
Sattari MT, Apaydin H, Band SS et al (2021) Comparative analysis of kernel-based versus ANN and deep learning methods in monthly reference evapotranspiration estimation. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 25:603–618. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-603-2021
Sentelhas PC, Gillespie TJ, Santos EA (2010) Evaluation of FAO Penman-Monteith and alternative methods for estimating reference evapotranspiration with missing data in Southern Ontario, Canada. Agric Water Manag 97:635–644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2009.12.001
Senthil Kumar AR, Ojha CSP, Goyal MK et al (2012) Modeling of suspended sediment concentration at kasol in india using ANN, fuzzy logic, and decision tree algorithms. J Hydrol Eng 17:394–404. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000445
Shuttleworth WJ, Wallace JS (1985) Evaporation from sparse crops-an energy combination theory. Q J R Meteorol Soc 111:839–855. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49711146910
Sikora R, Al-Laymoun O, Sikora R, Al-Laymoun O (2015) A Modified Stacking Ensemble Machine Learning Algorithm Using Genetic Algorithmsations through Big Data Analytics. In: Handbook of Research on Organizational Transformations through Big Data Analytics. IGI Global, pp 43–53
Su Z (2002) The surface energy balance system (SEBS) for estimation of turbulent heat fluxes. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 6:85–100. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-6-85-2002
Tikhamarine Y, Malik A, Kumar A et al (2019) Estimation of monthly reference evapotranspiration using novel hybrid machine learning approaches. Hydrol Sci J 64:1824–1842. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2019.1678750
Tikhamarine Y, Malik A, Souag-Gamane D, Kisi O (2020) Artificial intelligence models versus empirical equations for modeling monthly reference evapotranspiration. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 27:30001–30019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08792-3
Torgo L (1997) Functional Models for Regression Tree Leaves. In: Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA, pp 385–393
Verbyla DL (1987) Classification trees: a new discrimination tool. Can J for Res 17:1150–1152. https://doi.org/10.1139/X87-177
Vishwakarma DK, Pandey K, Kaur A et al (2022) Methods to estimate evapotranspiration in humid and subtropical climate conditions. Agric Water Manag 261:107378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107378
Wolpert DH (1992) Stacked generalization. Neural Netw 5:241–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0893-6080(05)80023-1
Wu M, Feng Q, Wen X et al (2020) Random forest predictive model development with uncertainty analysis capability for the estimation of evapotranspiration in an arid oasis region. Hydrol Res 51:648–665. https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2020.012
Yassin MA, Alazba AA, Mattar MA (2016) Artificial neural networks versus gene expression programming for estimating reference evapotranspiration in arid climate. Agric Water Manag 163:110–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2015.09.009
Zhang D, Liu X, Hong H (2013) Assessing the effect of climate change on reference evapotranspiration in China. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 27:1871–1881. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-013-0723-0
Zhou Z-H (2009) Ensemble Learning. In: Li SZ, Jain A (eds) Encyclopedia of Biometrics. Springer, US, Boston, MA, pp 270–273
Acknowledgements
The authors are thankful to the Head & Principal Scientist, Division of Agricultural Physics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Pusa Campus, New Delhi, Head, Climate Change and Agricultural Meteorology, Punjab Agricultural University Ludhiana, Punjab, and Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences & Technology of Kashmir, Srinagar, India for providing meteorological information for the present study.
Funding
No funding was received for conducting this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Nand Lal Kushwaha, Ahmed Elbeltagi, and Jitendra Rajput: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Software, Writing- Original draft preparation. Nand Lal Kushwaha, Dinesh Kumar Vishwakarma, **gwen Zhang, Manish Kumar, and Chaitanya B. Pande: Visualization, Comments and Revisions recommendations, Writing- Reviewing and Editing. Ahmed Elbeltagi, Luc Cimusa Kulimushi, Pandurang Choudhari, Kusum Pandey, and Navsal Kumar: Formal analysis, Software, Validation. **gwen Zhang, Sarita Gajbhiye Meshram, Parveen Sihag, and Ismail Abdelaty: Supervision, Comments and Revisions Recommendations, Writing- Reviewing and Editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All authors comply with the guidelines of the journal Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment.
Consent to participate
All authors agreed to participate in this study.
Consent to publication
All authors agreed to the publication of this manuscript.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Elbeltagi, A., Kushwaha, N.L., Rajput, J. et al. Modelling daily reference evapotranspiration based on stacking hybridization of ANN with meta-heuristic algorithms under diverse agro-climatic conditions. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 36, 3311–3334 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-022-02196-0
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-022-02196-0