Abstract
Background
There is little evidence in the literature to support a lower incidence of adhesion formation following laparoscopic surgery rather than laparotomy. Adhesion formation after laparotomy has been well studied, but we believe that the decrease or absence of adhesions following laparoscopic surgery is underreported. Therefore, we set out to evaluate adhesion formation following laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) compared with open cholecystectomy (OC).
Methods
Group A consisted of 18 patients who underwent a second laparoscopy due to various intraabdominal diseases after an LC had already been performed. Group B consisted of eight patients who underwent laparoscopy due to various intraabdominal diseases after an open cholecystectomy performed at an earlier date. In both groups, the frequency, extent, and thickness of adhesions were evaluated according to a standardized scoring system.
Results
Ten patients in group A (55.5%) had no adhesion formation either on the treated side of the previous LC or on the trocar entry sites. Three patients (16.6%) had minimal adhesions on the treated side of the previous LC, but no adhesions were observed at the trocar entry sites. Five patients (27.7%) had loose, easily separable adhesions on the treated site of the previous LC and at the trocar entry sites. All eight patients in group B (100%) had thick and extensive adhesions either on the treated side of the previous open cholecystectomy or the anterior abdominal wall below the surgical incision.
Conclusion
This comparative clinical study suggests that LC results in less adhesion formation, either on the operative or at the trocar entry sites, than open cholecystectomy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cushieri A, Dubois F, Mouiel J, Mouret P, Becker H, Buess G, Trede M, Troidl H (1991) The European experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 161: 385–387
Drollete CM, Badaway SZ (1992) Pathophysiology of pelvic adhesions: modern trends in preventing infertility. J Reprod Med, 37: 107–121
Ellis H, Moran BJ, Thompson JN, Parker MC, Wilson MS, Menzies D, McGuire A, Lower AM, Hawthorn RJ, O’Brien F, Buchan S, Growe AM (1999) Adhesion-related hospital readmissions after abdominal and pelvic surgery: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 353: 1476–1480
Filmar S, Gomel V, McComb PF (1987) Operative laparoscopy versus open abdominal surgery: a comaprative study on postoperative adhesion formation in the rat model. Fertil Steril 48: 486–489
Gerrand CL, Clements RH, Nanney L, Davidson JM, Richards WO (1999) Adhesion formation is reduced after laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 13: 10–13 DOI: 10.1007/s004649900887
Harris BC (1993) Retrospective comparison of outcome of 100 consecutive open cholecystectomies and 100 consecutive laparoscopic cholecystectomies. South Med J 86: 993–996
Jorgensen JO, Lalak MJ, Hunt DR (1995) Is laparoscopy associated with a lower rate of postoperative adhesions than laparotomy? A comparative study in the rabbit. Aust N Z J Surg 65: 342–344
Kaidi AA, Gurchumelidze T, Nazzal M, Figert P, Vanterpool C, Silva Y (1995) Tumor necrosis factor-alpha: a marker for peritoneal adhesion formation. J Surg Res 58: 516–518
Leurant SG, Bieber EJ, Barnes RB (1997) Anterior abdominal wall adhesions after laparoscopy or laparoscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 4: 353–356
Luciano A, Hauser K, Benda J (1983) Evaluation of commonly used adjuvants in the prevention of postoperative adhesions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 146: 88–92
Luciano A, Maier D, Koch E, Nulsen J, Whirtman G (1989) A comparative study of postoperative adhesions following laser surgery by laparoscopy versus laparotomy in the rabbit model. Obstet Gynecol 74: 220–224
Lundorff P, Hahlin M, Kallfelt B, Thorburn J, Lindblom B (1991) Adhesion formation after laparoscopic surgery in tubal pregnancy: a randomized trial versus laparotomy. Fertil Steril 55: 911–915
Meyers WC, Club TS (1991) A prospective analysis of 1,518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. N Engl J Med 324: 1073–1078
National Institutes of Health consensus conference statement on gallstones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy Am J Surg 165: 390–398
Schafer M, Kraheub L, Buchler MW (1998) Comparison of adhesion formation in open and laparoscopic surgery. Dig Surg 15: 148–152
Schippers E, Tittel A, Ottinger A, Schumpelick V (1998) Laparoscopy versus laparotomy: comparison of adhesion formation after bowel resection in a canine model. Dig Surg 15: 145–147
Soper NJ, Stockmann PT, Dunnegan DL, Ashley SW (1992) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the new gold standard. Arch Surg 127: 917–923
Kopernik G, Avinoach E, Grossman Y, Levy R, Yulzari R, Rogachev B, Douvdevani A (1998) The effect of a high partial pressure of carbon dioxide environment on metabolism and immune functions of human peritoneal cells: relevance to carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum. Am J Obstet Gynecol 179: 1503–1510
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Online publication: 18 October 2000
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Polymeneas, G., Theodosopoulos, T., Stamatiadis, A. et al. A comparative study of postoperative adhesion formation after laparoscopic vs open cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 15, 41–43 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004640000269
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004640000269