Log in

Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery-assisted versus laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy (NAOC vs. LOC): a case-matched study

  • Dynamic Manuscript
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) has shown its prospection as a minimally invasive endoscopic surgery. This study aimed to examine the safety and efficacy of combined NOTES and vaginal approach, natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery-assisted ovarian cystectomy (NAOC), in the conservative management of benign ovarian tumors.

Methods

Records were reviewed for the 34 consecutive NAOC procedures between May 2011 and March 2014. Age, body mass index, parity, size of the mass, and bilaterality of the mass were used to select comparable patient who had undergone laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy (LOC).

Results

A total of 277 patients were recruited in this study (243 LOCs and 34 NAOCs, respectively). There was no incidence of switching to abdominal laparotomy. Length of operation and length of postoperative stay were significantly greater in the LOC group than in the NAOC group, but total hospital charges were similar in both groups. There was no difference in febrile morbidity between the two groups but more estimated blood loss (EBL) in NAOC group, although EBL was <50 mL in the two groups. Linear correlations of mass size with operating time and EBL existed in LOC group, but not in NAOC group.

Conclusion

NAOC can be safely performed for benign and large ovarian tumors. Besides, NAOC offers a superior operative efficiency compared with LOC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Borgfeldt C, Andolf E (1999) Transvaginal sonographic ovarian findings in a random sample of women 25–40 years old. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 13:345–350

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Castillo G, Alcazar JL, Jurado M (2004) Natural history of sonographically detected simple unilocular adnexal cysts in asymptomatic postmenopausal women. Gynecol Oncol 92:965–969

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pavlik EJ, Ueland FR, Miller RW, Ubellacker JM, DeSimone CP, Elder J et al (2013) Frequency and disposition of ovarian abnormalities followed with serial transvaginal ultrasonography. Obstet Gynecol 122:210–217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nezhat C, Cho J, King LP, Hajhosseini B, Nezhat F (2011) Laparoscopic management of adnexal masses. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am 38:663–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wu MP, Wu CJ, Long CY, Ho CH, Huang KH, Chu CC et al (2013) Surgical trends for benign ovarian tumors among hospitals of different accreditation levels: an 11-year nationwide population-based descriptive study in Taiwan. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 52:498–504

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Teng FY, Muzsnai D, Perez R, Mazdisnian F, Ross A, Sayre JW (1996) A comparative study of laparoscopy and colpotomy for the removal of ovarian dermoid cysts. Obstet Gynecol 87:1009–1013

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ferrari MM, Mezzopane R, Bulfoni A, Grijuela B, Carminati R, Ferrazzi E et al (2003) Surgical treatment of ovarian dermoid cysts: a comparison between laparoscopic and vaginal removal. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 109:88–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang CJ, Chao A, Lai CH, Huang SY, Lee CL, Soong YK (2009) Laparoscopically assisted vaginal ovarian cystectomy for clinically diagnosed benign large ovarian masses. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 19:623–628

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ahn KH, Song JY, Kim SH, Lee KW, Kim T (2012) Transvaginal single-port natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for benign uterine adnexal pathologies. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 19:631–635

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee CL, Wu KY, Su H, Ueng SH, Yen CF (2012) Transvaginal natural-orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) in adnexal procedures. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 19:509–513

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Su H, Yen CF, Wu KY, Han CM, Lee CL (2012) Hysterectomy via transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): feasibility of an innovative approach. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 51:217–221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yang YS, Hur MH, Oh KY, Kim SY (2013) Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for adnexal masses. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 39:1604–1609

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang CJ, Huang HY, Huang CY, Su H (2015) Hysterectomy via transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for nonprolapsed uteri. Surg Endosc 29(1):100–107

  14. Lee CL, Soong YK, Lai YM, Chang SY, Chang MY (1992) Simplified instrumentation for laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy. Changgeng Yi Xue Za Zhi 15:28–32

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Joffe MM, Rosenbaum PR (1999) Invited commentary: propensity scores. Am J Epidemiol 150:327–333

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Goldenberg M, Oelsner G, Bider D, Admon D, Rabinowich O, Mashiach S (1994) A new approach to ovarian cystectomy: a combined laparoscopic and extra-abdominal microsurgical technique. Gynecol Obstet Invest 37:196–198

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Goh SM, Yam J, Loh SF, Wong A (2007) Minimal access approach to the management of large ovarian cysts. Surg Endosc 21:80–83

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang PH, Lee WL, Juang CM, Tsai WY, Chao HT, Yuan CC (2001) Excision of mature teratoma using culdotomy, with and without laparoscopy: a prospective randomised trial. BJOG 108:91–94

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Miller CE (2001) Methods of tissue extraction in advanced laparoscopy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 13:399–405

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr E, Garry R et al (2009) Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (3):CD003677. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub4

  21. American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) Committee opinion no. 444 (2009) Choosing the route of hysterectomy for benign disease. Obstet Gynecol 114:1156–1158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ghezzi F, Raio L, Mueller MD, Gyr T, Buttarelli M, Franchi M (2002) Vaginal extraction of pelvic masses following operative laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 16:1691–1696

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Guerriero S, Alcazar JL, Ajossa S, Lai MP, Errasti T, Mallarini G et al (2001) Comparison of conventional color Doppler imaging and power doppler imaging for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer: results of a European study. Gynecol Oncol 83:299–304

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Chin-Jung Wang, Pei-Yin Wu, Hsin-Hong Kuo, Hsing-Tse Yu, Chen-Ying Huang, and Hsiao-Jung Tseng have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chin-Jung Wang.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, CJ., Wu, PY., Kuo, HH. et al. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery-assisted versus laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy (NAOC vs. LOC): a case-matched study. Surg Endosc 30, 1227–1234 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4315-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4315-6

Keywords

Navigation