Abstract
Background
Laparoscopic resection has become an accepted approach to gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), with acceptable early results published in the literature. Long-term recurrence rates, however, are still unclear, and the management of tumors in challenging locations requires exploration.
Methods
A retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing a laparoscopic resection of gastric GIST in our institution between November 1997 and July 2004 was performed.
Results
A total of 14 patients with 15 tumors were evaluated, 5 of which were located high on the lesser curve. All the patients had an attempted laparoscopic approach, with the following procedures performed: stapled wedge excision (n = 8), excision and manual sewing technique (n = 4), and distal gastrectomy (n = 1). Overall, there was a 15% (n = 2) conversion rate. Lesions found in the fundus and greater curvature areas were easily resected via simple stapled wedge excision. High lesser curve tumors were more difficult to manage and required a combination of methods for complete excision and preservation of the gastrointestinal junction including intraoperative gastroscopy, excision and manual sewing technique, and reconstruction over an esophageal bougie. There were no postoperative complications, and the length of hospital stay was 4.6 ± 1.9 days. At a median follow-up period of 46.5 months (mean, 37.4 ± 26 months), one patient experienced a recurrence (18 months postoperatively), with eventual disease-related death.
Conclusion
The laparoscopic approach to gastric GIST tumors is safe and associated with acceptable short- and intermediate-term results. High lesser curve GISTs can be safely approached laparoscopically using various techniques to ensure an adequate resection margin without compromise of the GE junction.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Basso N, Rosato P, De Leo A, Picconi T, Trentino P, Fantini A, Silecchia G (2000) Laparoscopic treatment of gastric stromal tumors. Surg Endosc 14: 524–526
Bouillot JL, Bresler L, Fagniez PL, Samama G, Champault G, Parent Y, Societe Francaise de Chirurgie Laparoscopique (2003) Exérèse laparoscopique des tumeurs sous-muqueuses bénignes de l’estomac: à propos de 65 cas. (full text in English on http://www.e2med.com/gcb). Gastroenterol Clin Biol 27: 272–276
Bucher P, Taylor S, Viliger P, Morel P, Brundler MA (2004) Are there prognostic factors for small intestinal stromal tumors? Am J Surg 187: 761–766
Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350: 2050–2059
Connolly EM, Gaffney E, Reynolds JV (2003) Gastrointestinal stromal tumours. Br J Surg 90: 1178–1186
DeMatteo RP, Lewis JJ, Leung D, Mudan SS, Woodruff JM, Brennan MF (2000) Two hundred gastrointestinal stromal tumors: recurrence patterns and prognosis factors for survival. Ann Surg 1: 51–58
Emory TS, Sobin LH, Lukes L, Lee DH, O’Leary TJ (1999) Prognosis of gastrointestinal smooth-muscle (stromal) tumors: dependence on anatomic site. Am J Pathol 23: 82–87
Fletcher CDM, Berman JJ, Corless C, Gorstein F, Lasota J, Longley BJ, Miettinen M, O’Leary TJ, Remotti H, Rubin BP, Shmookler B, Sobin LH, Weiss SW (2002) Diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a consensus approach. Int J Surg Pathol 10: 81–89
Fujimoto Y, Nakanishi Y, Yoshimura K, Shimoda T (2003) Clinicopathologic study of primary malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the stomach, with special reference to prognostic factors: analysis of results in 140 surgically resected patients. Gastric Cancer 6: 39–48
Hepworth CC, Menzies D, Motson RW (2000) Minimally invasive surgery for posterior gastric stromal tumors. Surg Endosc 14: 349–353
Kimata M, Kubota T, Otani Y, Ohgami M, Ishikawa Y, Yokoyama T, Issiki S, Abe S, Egawa T, Tokuyama J, Wada N, Kumai K, Kitajima M, Mukai M (2000) Gastrointestinal stromal tumors treated by laparoscopic surgery: report of three cases. Surg Today 30: 177–180
Kindblom LG, Remotti HE, Aldenborg F, Meis-Kindblom JM (1998) Gastrointestinal pacemaker cell tumor (GIPACT): gastrointestinal stromal tumors show phenotypic characteristics of the interstitial cells of Cajal. Am J Pathol 152: 1259–1269
Leung KL, Kwok SP, Lam SC, Lee JF, Yiu RY, Ng SS, Lai PB, Lau WY (2004) Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomized trial. Lancet 363: 1187–1192
Ludwig K, Wilhelm L, Scharlau U, Amtsberg G, Bernhardt J (2002) Laparoscopic–endoscopic rendezvous resection of gastric tumors. Surg Endosc 16: 1561–1565
Lukaszczyk JJ, Preletz RJ Jr (1992) Laparoscopic resection of benign stromal tumor of the stomach. J Laparoendosc Surg 2: 331–334
Matthews BD, Walsh RM, Kercher KW, Sing RF, Pratt BL, Answini GA, Heniford BT (2002) Laparoscopic vs open resection of gastric stromal tumors. Surg Endosc 16: 803–807
Mochiki E, Nakabayashi T, Kamimura H, Haga N, Asao T, Kuwano H (2002) Gastrointestinal recovery and outcome after laparoscopy-assisted versus conventional open distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. World J Surg 26: 1145–1149
Morgan BK, Compton C, Talbert M, Gallagher WJ, Wood WC (1990) Benign smooth muscle tumors of the gastrointestinal tract: a 24-year experience. Ann Surg 211: 63–66
Sircar K, Hewlett BR, Huizinga JD, Chorneyko K, Berezin I, Riddell RH (1999) Interstitial cells of Cajal as precursors of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Am J Surg Pathol 23: 979–987
Tazawa K, Tsukada K, Makuuchi H, Tsutsumi Y (1999) An immunohistochemical and clinicopathological study of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Pathol Internat 49: 786–798
Weber KJ, Reyes CD, Gagner M, Divino CM (2003) Comparison of laparoscopic and open gastrectomy for malignant disease. Surg Endos 17: 968–971
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Ms. Cybelle Fernandez for her aid in data collection and analysis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bédard, E.L.R., Mamazza, J., Schlachta, C.M. et al. Laparoscopic resection of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Surg Endosc 20, 500–503 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0287-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0287-2