Abstract
Background
Novel surgical methods and procedures used to be introduced by experts and were established depending on the corresponding success that was noted. Surgical trials representing evidence level 1b were and still are called into question for different reasons. Prospective randomized controlled trials comparing various surgical strategies that were conducted over the past 11 years in the clinical trial unit in the department of general, visceral, and transplantation surgery of the University of Heidelberg pointed out problems as well as possible solutions for surgical trials’ characteristics.
Purpose
When planning a study within a department of surgery, several aspects have to be considered. The article aims at outlining pitfalls that have to be dealt with as well as possible solutions by outlining experiences within several conducted trials.
Conclusions
The compilation of solutions announcing the challenges of surgical studies shows that valid high-quality trials are feasible.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Seiler CM, Wente MN, Diener MK, Fröhlich BE, Büchler MW, Knaebel HP (2006) Center for clinical studies in a surgical department–an approach for more evidence-based medicine. Contemp Clin Trials 27(3):211–214
Knebel P, Fröhlich B, Knaebel HP, Kienle P, Luntz S, Buchler MW, Seiler CM (2006) Comparison of Venae Sectio vs. modified Seldinger Technique for totally implantable access ports; Portas-trial [ISRCTN:52368201]. Trials 7:20
Knebel P, Fischer L, Cremonese E, Lopez-Benitez R, Stampfl U, Radeleff B, Kauczor H-U, Büchler MW, Seiler CM (2008) Protocol of an expertise based randomized trial comparing surgical Venae Sectio versus radiological Puncture of Vena Subclavia for insertion of Totally Implantable Access Port in oncological patients. Trials 9:60. doi:10.1186/1745-6215-9-60
Gehrig T, Knebel P, Scheel V, Hinz U, Seiler CM, Müller-Stich BP, Büchler MW, Gutt CN (2011) Liga Sure Impact™ versus conventional dissection technique in pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy in clinical suspicion of cancerous tumours on the head of the pancreas: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 12:162. doi:10.1186/1745-6215-12-162
Hackert T, Bruckner T, Dörr-Harim C, Diener MK, Knebel P, Hartwig W, Strobel O, Fritz S, Schneider L, Werner J, Büchler MW (2013) Pylorus resection or pylorus preservation in partial pancreatico-duodenectomy (PROPP study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 14:44. doi:10.1186/1745-6215-14-44
Diener MK, Bruckner T, Contin P, Halloran C, Glanemann M, Schlitt HJ, Mössner J, Kieser M, Werner J, Büchler MW, Seiler CM (2010) ChroPac-trial: duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection versus pancreatoduodenectomy for chronic pancreatitis. Trial protocol of a randomised controlled multicentre trial. Trials 11:47. doi:10.1186/1745-6215-11-47
Rahbari NN, Lordick F, Fink C, Bork U, Stange A, Jäger D, Luntz SP, Englert S, Rossion I, Koch M, Büchler MW, Kieser M, Weitz J, SYNCHRONOUS trial group (2012) Resection of the primary tumour versus no resection prior to systemic therapy in patients with colon cancer and synchronous unresectable metastases (UICC stage IV): SYNCHRONOUS–a randomised controlled multicentre trial (ISRCTN30964555). BMC Cancer 12:142. doi:10.1186/1471-2407-12-142
Diener MK, Seiler CM, Rossion I, Kleeff J, Glanemann M, Butturini G, Tomazic A, Bruns CJ, Busch OR, Farkas S, Belyaev O, Neoptolemos JP, Halloran C, Keck T, Niedergethmann M, Gellert K, Witzigmann H, Kollmar O, Langer P, Steger U, Neudecker J, Berrevoet F, Ganzera S, Heiss MM, Luntz SP, Bruckner T, Kieser M, Büchler MW (2011) Efficacy of stapler versus hand-sewn closure after distal pancreatectomy (DISPACT): a randomised, controlled multicentre trial. Lancet 377(9776):1514–1522. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60237-7
Machin D, Campbell MJ (1987) Statistical tables for the design of clinical trials Blackwell Scientific Publications (ISBN 0632012757)
Parikh D, Johnson M, Chagla L, Lowe D, McCulloch P (1996) D2 gastrectomy: lessons from a prospective audit of the learning curve. Br J Surg 83(11):1595–1599
Devereaux PJ, Bhandari M, Clarke M, Montori VM, Cook DJ, Yusuf S, Sackett DL, Cinà CS, Walter SD, Haynes B, Schünemann HJ, Norman GR, Guyatt GH (2005) Need for expertise based randomised controlled trials. BMJ 330(7482):88
Nocito A, Wildi S, Rufibach K, Clavien PA, Weber M (2009) Randomized clinical trial comparing venous cutdown with the Seldinger technique for placement of implantable venous access ports. Br J Surg 96(10):1129–1134. doi:10.1002/bjs.6730
Strobel O, Büchler MW (2013) The problem of the poor control arm in surgical randomized controlled trials. Br J Surg 100(2):172–173. doi:10.1002/bjs.8998. Epub 2012 Nov 23
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung: BMBF-Förderrichtlinien Klinische Studien mit hoher Relevanz für die Patientenversorgung Leitfaden für die Antragstellung, Version 1.0 von April 2013
Bruce J, Russell EM, Mollison J, Krukowski ZH (2001) The measurement and monitoring of surgical adverse events. Health Technol Assess 5:1–194
Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J, Neoptolemos J, Sarr M, Traverso W, Buchler M, International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula Definition (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138(1):8–13
Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, Izbicki JR, Neoptolemos JP, Padbury RT, Sarr MG, Traverso LW, Yeo CJ, Büchler MW (2007) Delayed gastricemptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 142(5):761–768
Rahbari NN, Weitz J, Hohenberger W, Heald RJ, Moran B, Ulrich A, Holm T, Wong WD, Tiret E, Moriya Y, Laurberg S, DenDulk M, van de Velde C, Büchler MW (2010) Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a proposal by the. Int Study Group Rectal Cancer Surg 147(3):339–351. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2009.10.012
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213
Higgins JPT (2011) Green S (editors) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration
Seiler CM, Deckert A, Diener MK, Knaebel HP, Weigand MA, Victor N, Büchler MW (2009) Midline versus transverse incision in major abdominal surgery: a randomized, double-blind equivalence trial (POVATI: ISRCTN60734227). Ann Surg 249(6):913–920. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181a77c92
McCulloch P, Altman DG, Campbell WB, Flum DR, Glasziou P, Marshall JC, Nicholl J (2009) Balliol collaboration no surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations. Lancet 374(9695):1105–1112
McCulloch P, Cook JA, Altman DG, Heneghan C, Diener MK, IDEAL Group (2013) IDEAL framework for surgical innovation 1: the idea and development stages. BMJ 346:3012. doi:10.1136/bmj.f3012
Conflicts of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Doerr-Harim, C., Bruckner, T., Diener, M.K. et al. Insights into surgical trials: methodological challenges and solutions. Langenbecks Arch Surg 399, 273–278 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-013-1155-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-013-1155-5