Abstract
The major part of the liquid radioactive waste released by the Mayak Production Association (PA) radiochemical plant into the Techa river occurred in 1949–1951, but there is information on only one single radiochemical analysis of a water sample taken on 24 and 25 September 1951. These data are here used to assess the spectrum of radionuclides that were released between 1949 and 1951. For this purpose, details of the radiochemical methods of radionuclide extraction and radiometric measurements of β-activity used at Mayak PA in the 1950s have been taken into account. It is concluded that the data from the radiochemical measurements agree with the theoretical composition of fission products in uranium after exposure times in the reactor (120 days) and subsequent hold times (35 days) that were typical for the procedures at that time. The results of the analysis are at variance with assumptions that underlie the current Techa river dosimetry system. They confirm the conclusion that the external doses to the Techa river residents in the critical period up to 1952 were predominantly due to short-lived fission products.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akleev AV, Kiselev MF (2001) Medical-biological and ecological impacts on radioactive contamination of the Techa river. ISBN 5-88931-026-7, Chelyabinsk
Miller KL (ed) (1996) Special Issue. Health Phys 71:141
Kellerer AM (ed) (2002) Beyond Chernobyl—A synopsis of the other radioepidemiological studies in the former Soviet Union. Radiat Environ Biophys (Special issue) 41: 1–86
Kellerer AM (2002) The Southern Urals radiation studies. A reappraisal of the current status. Editorial. Radiat Environ Biophys 41:307–316
Mokrov YuG (2002) A reconsideration of the external dose assessment for the Techa river population. Radiat Environ Biophys 41:303–306
Vorobiova MI, Degteva MO, Burmistrov DS, Safronova NG, Kozheurov VP, Anspaugh LR, Napier BA (1999) Review of historical monitoring data on the Techa River contamination. Health Phys 76:605–618
Ilyin DI (1956) Migration of radioactive substances from open water reservoirs (in Russian). Doctoral thesis. Technical Science, Mayak PA archives, Ozyorsk
Mokrov YG (2002) Reconstruction and prediction of radioactive contamination of the Techa river. Part I. Role of weighted particles in the formation of the Techa river radioactive contamination during 1949–1951 (in Russian). Library of the journal “Issues on radiation safety”, No. 1. Ozyorsk
Alexandrov AP, Mishenko GV, Tarasenko NYu, Zaitsev BA, Shtukenberg YuM, Letavet AA, Ilyin DA (1951) Contamination of the territory adjacent to Mendeleyev facility. Report. Mayak PA archives
Kruglov AK (1995) Establishment of the nuclear industry in USSR (in Russian), 2nd ed. Atominform, p 380
Gussev NG, Rubtsov PM, Kovalenko VV, Kolobashkin VM (1974) Radiation characteristics of the fission products: Reference book (in Russian). Atomizdat, p 224
Arapova MA, Lupanova AV (1955) Methods of extraction and definition of the fission elements (in Russian). Report. Mayak PA archives, Ozyorsk
Manuals on beta-exposure intensity measurements (1952) Mayak PA archives.
Khai DM (1952) Element identification and quantitative definition of impurities by beta-exposure attenuation method. Mayak PA archives, Ozyorsk
MINATOM (1978) Radioactive substances. Method for radionuclide inventory definition in the beta-exposure sources by measuring exposure attenuation in aluminum filters. National Minatom Standard 95:600–78.
Kholnov YuV, Chechev VP, Kamynov ShV, Kuzmenko NK, Nedovesov VG (1980) Characterization of radionuclide exposures used in national economy. Reference book (in Russian). Atomizdat, p 376
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Published online: 11 March 2003
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mokrov, Y.G. Reconstruction of the radionuclide spectrum of liquid radioactive waste released into the Techa river in 1949–1951. Radiat Environ Biophys 42, 7–15 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-003-0182-y
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-003-0182-y