Abstract
Introduction
In this study, we proposed a three-stage treatment protocol for recalcitrant distal femoral nonunion and aimed to analyze the clinical results.
Materials and methods
We retrospective reviewed 12 consecutive patients with recalcitrant distal femoral nonunion undergoing our three-stage treatment protocol from January 2010 to December 2014 in our institute. The three-stage treatment protocol comprised debridement of the nonunion site, lengthening to eliminate leg length discrepancy, deformity correction, stabilization with a locked plate, filling of the defect with cement spacer for inducing membrane formation, and bone reconstruction using a cancellous bone autograft (Masquelet technique) or free vascularized fibular bone graft. The bone union time, wound complication, lower limbs alignment, amount of lengthening, knee range of motion, and functional outcomes were evaluated.
Results
Osseous union with angular deformity <5° and leg length discrepancy <1 cm were achieved in all the patients. The average amount of lengthening was 5.88 cm (range 3.5–12 cm). Excellent or good outcomes were obtained in 9 patients.
Conclusions
Although the current study involved only a small number of patients and the intervention comprised three stages, we believe that such a protocol may be a valuable alternative for the treatment of recalcitrant distal femoral nonunion.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00402-017-2634-x/MediaObjects/402_2017_2634_Fig1_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00402-017-2634-x/MediaObjects/402_2017_2634_Fig2a_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00402-017-2634-x/MediaObjects/402_2017_2634_Fig2b_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00402-017-2634-x/MediaObjects/402_2017_2634_Fig3a_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00402-017-2634-x/MediaObjects/402_2017_2634_Fig3b_HTML.jpg)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Zlowodzki M, Bhandari M, Marek DJ et al (2006) Operative treatment of acute distal femur fractures: systematic review of 2 comparative studies and 45 case series (1989 to 2005). J Orthop Trauma 20:366–371
Gardner MJ, Toro-Arbelaez JB, Harrison M et al (2008) Open reduction and internal fixation of distal femoral nonunions: long-term functional outcomes following a treatment protocol. J Trauma 64:434–438
Kabata T, Tsuchiya H, Sakurakichi K et al (2005) Reconstruction with distraction osteogenesis for juxta-articular nonunions with bone loss. J Trauma 58:1213–1222
Wu CC (2011) Modified retrograde-locked nailing for aseptic femoral supracondylar nonunion with severe osteoporosis in elderly patients. J Trauma 71:26–30
Shroeder JE, Mosheiff R, Khoury A et al (2009) The outcome of closed, intramedullary exchange nailing with reamed insertion in the treatment of femoral shaft nonunions. J Orthop Trauma 23(9):653–657
Wu CC (2011) Retrograde dynamic locked nailing for aseptic nonunion of femoral supracondyle after antegrade locked nailing. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 131:513–517
Wang JW, Weng LH (2003) Treatment of distal femoral nonunion with internal fixation, cortical allograft struts, and autogenous bone-grafting. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85:436–440
Amorosa LF, Jayaram PR, Wellman DS et al (2014) The use of the 95-degree-angled blade plate in femoral nonunion surgery. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 24:953–960
Minami A, Kasashima T, Iwasaki N et al (2000) Vascularised fibular grafts. J Bone Joint Surg Br 82B:1022–1025
Ali F, Saleh M (2002) Treatment of distal femoral nonunions by external fixation with simultaneous length and alignment correction. Injury 33:127–134
Saridis A, Panagiotopoulos E, Tyllianakis M et al (2006) The use of the Ilizarov method as a salvage procedure in infected nonunion of the distal femur with bone loss. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:232–237
Tu YK, Yen CY (2007) Role of vascularized bone grafts in lower extremity osteomyelitis. Orthop Clin N Am 38:37–49
Insall JN, Ranawat CS, Aglietti P et al (1976) A comparison of four models of total knee-replacement prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 58:754–765
Megas P (2005) Classification of non-union. Injury 36:30–37
Ebraheim NA, Martin A, Sochacki KR et al (2013) Nonunion of distal femoral fractures: a systematic review. Orthop Surg 5:46–50
Inan M, Karaoglu S, Cilli F et al (2005) Treatment of femoral nonunions by usig cyclic compression and distraction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 436:222–228
Patil S, Montgomery R (2006) Management of complex tibial and femoral nonunion using the Ilizarov technique, and its cost implications. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:928–932
Henderson CE, Kuhl LL, Fitzpatrick DC et al (2011) Locking plates for distal femur fractures: is there a problem with fracture healing? J Orthop Trauma 25:8–14
Schütz M, Müller M, Krettek C et al (2001) Minimally invasive fracture stabilization of distal femoral fractures with the LISS: a prospective multicenter study. Results of a clinical study with special emphasis on difficult cases. Injury 32:48–54
Giannoudis O, Faour O, Goff T et al (2011) Masquelet technique for the treatment of bone defects: tips-tricks and future directions. Injury 42:591–598
Gubin AV, Borzunov DY, Malkova TA (2013) The Ilizarov paradigm: thirty years with the Ilizarov method, current concerns and future research. Int Orthop 37:1533–1539
Chan DB, Jeffcoat DM, Lorich DG et al (2010) Nonunions around the knee joint. Int Orthop 34:271–281
Zlowodzki M, Williamson S, Zardiackas LD et al (2006) Biomechanical evaluation of the less invasive stabilization system and the 95-degree angled blade plate for the internal fixation of distal femur fractures in human cadaveric bone with high bone mineral density. J Trauma 60:836–840
Weiland AJ, Phillips TW, Randolph MA (1984) Bone graft: a radiological, histological and biomechanical model comparing auto grafts, free vascularized bone allografts and grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg 74:368–379
Pelissier P, Masquelet AC, Bareille R et al (2004) Induced membranes secrete growth factors including vascular and osteoinductive factors and could stimulate bone regeneration. J Orthop Res 22(1):73–79
Acknowledgements
We thank all patients for participating in the study and Editage Company for the English editing.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
No funds were received in support of this work. No benefits in any form have been or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this manuscript.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ma, CH., Chiu, YC., Tu, YK. et al. Three-stage treatment protocol for recalcitrant distal femoral nonunion. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 137, 489–498 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-017-2634-x
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-017-2634-x