Log in

Evaluation of spacer block technique using tensor device in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

  • Knee Arthroplasty
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) was designed so that flexion and extension gap adjustments could achieve isometric function of the ligaments throughout ROM to prevent complications. However, achieving accurate knee balancing using a spacer block technique remains difficult since determination of the thickness of the spacer block is determined according to the feeling of the individual surgeon’s hand. The objective of the study was to investigate flexion and extension medial unicompartmental knee gap kinematics in mobile-bearing UKA and to reveal the accuracy of spacer block measurement technique using a gap tensor device.

Materials and methods

Mobile-bearing UKA was performed in 40 knees of 31 subjects using generally accepted spacer block technique so that the extension gap was made equal to the flexion gap. The extension and flexion gaps of the medial knee compartment were measured using the tensor device with 25, 50, 75, 100, 125, and 150 N of joint distraction force. The interplay gap was calculated by subtracting the thickness of the tibial prosthesis and the thickness of the selected size of bearing from the measured extension and flexion gaps. Medial compartmental joint interplay gap differences were compared among flexion and extension gaps.

Results

The mean flexion interplay gap was 25 N: 0.5 mm, 50 N: 1.5 mm, 75 N: 2.4 mm, 100 N: 3.1 mm, 125 N: 3.6 mm, 150 N: 4.0 mm. The mean extension interplay gap was 25 N: −0.2 mm, 50 N: 0.81 mm, 75 N: 1.7 mm, 100 N: 2.5 mm, 125 N: 3.1 mm, 150 N: 3.5 mm. The measured extension gap was shown to be significantly smaller compared with the flexion gap at every joint distraction force (P < 0.01).

Conclusions

These results suggest that gap measurement using a spacer block in UKA has the potential risk that the resulting extension gap may be smaller than the flexion gap. Surgeons should adjust the flexion and extension gaps with caution to achieve good ligament function when performing mobile-bearing UKA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Asano H, Hoshino A, Wilton TJ (2004) Soft-tissue tension total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 19(5):558–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Asano H, Muneta T, Sekiya I (2008) Soft tissue tension in extension in total knee arthroplasty affects postoperative knee extension and stability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16(11):999–1003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Attfield SF, Warren-Forward M, Wilton T, Sambatakakis A (1994) Measurement of soft tissue imbalance in total knee arthroplasty using electronic instrumentation. Med Eng Phys 16(6):501–505

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dorr LD, Boiardo RA (1986) Technical considerations in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 205:5–11

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gleeson RE, Evans R, Ackroyd CE, Webb J, Newman JH (2004) Fixed or mobile bearing unicompartmental knee replacement? A comparative cohort study. Knee 11(5):379–384

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hananouchi T, Yamamoto K, Ando W, Fudo K, Ohzono K (2012) The intraoperative gap difference (flexion gap minus extension gap) is altered by insertion of the trial femoral component. Knee 19(5):601–605

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Insall JN, Binazzi R, Soudry M, Mestriner LA (1985) Total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 192:13–22

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS (1957) Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 16(4):494–502

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Krackow KA, Mihalko WM (1999) The effect of medial release on flexion and extension gaps in cadaveric knees: implications for soft-tissue balancing in total knee arthroplasty. Am J Knee Surg 12(4):222–228

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Matsumoto T, Mizuno K, Muratsu H, Tsumura N, Fukase N, Kubo S, Yoshiya S, Kurosaka M, Kuroda R (2007) Influence of intra-operative joint gap on post-operative flexion angle in osteoarthritis patients undergoing posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15(8):1013–1018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Matsumoto T, Muratsu H, Kubo S, Kuroda R, Kurosaka M (2013) Intra-operative joint gap kinematics in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 28(1):29–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Matsumoto T, Muratsu H, Kubo S, Matsushita T, Kurosaka M, Kuroda R (2012) Intraoperative soft tissue balance reflects minimum 5-year midterm outcomes in cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 27(9):1723–1730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Muratsu H, Matsumoto T, Kubo S, Maruo A, Miya H, Kurosaka M, Kuroda R (2010) Femoral component placement changes soft tissue balance in posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 25(9):926–930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. O’Connor JJ, Goodfellow JW (1996) Theory and practice of meniscal knee replacement: designing against wear. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 210(3):217–222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. O’Connor JJ, Shercliff TL, Biden E, Goodfellow JW (1989) The geometry of the knee in the sagittal plane. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 203(4):223–233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Okamoto S, Okazaki K, Mitsuyasu H, Matsuda S, Mizu-Uchi H, Hamai S, Tashiro Y, Iwamoto Y (2014) Extension gap needs more than 1-mm laxity after implantation to avoid post-operative flexion contracture in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22(12):3174–3180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pandit H, Jenkins C, Gill HS, Barker K, Dodd CA, Murray DW (2011) Minimally invasive Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee replacement: results of 1000 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93(2):198–204

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pang HN, Yeo SJ, Chong HC, Chin PL, Ong J, Lo NN (2011) Computer-assisted gap balancing technique improves outcome in total knee arthroplasty, compared with conventional measured resection technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19(9):1496–1503

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Parmaksizoglu AS, Kabukcuoglu Y, Ozkaya U, Bilgili F, Aslan A (2010) Short-term results of the Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for medial arthritis. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 44(2):135–142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Price AJ, O’Connor JJ, Murray DW, Dodd CA, Goodfellow JW (2007) A history of Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 30(5 Suppl):7–10

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Price AJ, Svard U (2011) A second decade lifetable survival analysis of the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(1):174–179

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sambatakakis A, Attfield SF, Newton G (1993) Quantification of soft-tissue imbalance in condylar knee arthroplasty. J Biomed Eng 15(4):339–343

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Svard UC, Price AJ (2001) Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A survival analysis of an independent series. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83(2):191–194

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ten Ham AM, Heesterbeek PJ, van der Schaaf DB, Jacobs WC, Wymenga AB (2013) Flexion and extension laxity after medial, mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a comparison between a spacer- and a tension-guided technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(11):2447–2452

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Unitt L, Sambatakakis A, Johnstone D, Briggs TW (2008) Short-term outcome in total knee replacement after soft-tissue release and balancing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90(2):159–165

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Watanabe T, Muneta T, Sekiya I, Banks SA (2013) Intraoperative joint gaps affect postoperative range of motion in TKAs With posterior-stabilized prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471(4):1326–1333

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Whiteside LA, Saeki K, Mihalko WM (2000) Functional medical ligament balancing in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 380:45–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Winemaker MJ (2002) Perfect balance in total knee arthroplasty: the elusive compromise. J Arthroplasty 17(1):2–10

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takashi Suzuki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Suzuki, T., Ryu, K., Kojima, K. et al. Evaluation of spacer block technique using tensor device in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 135, 1011–1016 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-015-2231-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-015-2231-9

Keywords

Navigation