SpringerLink
Log in

Low inter- and intraobserver variability allows for reliable tunnel measurement in ACL reconstruction using the quadrant method

  • Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Correct anatomic tunnel positions are essential in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. To establish recommendations for tunnel positioning based on anatomical findings and to compare tunnel positions with clinical results, different radiological measurement methods as the quadrant method exist. Comparing the data of different observers requires the validation of the reliability of measurement methods. The purpose of this study therefore was to determine the reliability of the quadrant method to measure tunnel positions in ACL reconstruction. The hypothesis was, that the quadrant method shows a low inter- and intraobserver variability.

Materials and methods

In a test/retest scenario 20 knee surgeons were asked to determine defined tunnel positions in five lateral radiographs applying the quadrant method. Rotation, angle deviation, height and depth of the quadrant as well as absolute and relative tunnel positions of each observation were measured along referenced scales. Mean sizes and angle deviations of the quadrants, tunnel positions and deviations between the test/retest positions were calculated as well as standard deviations and range.

Results

Interobserver variability analyses, to plan as well as to determine tunnel positions in ACL reconstruction, showed a mean variability (SD) of <1 mm, with ranges of 2.5 mm for planning and 3.7 mm for determination of tunnel positions using the quadrant method. Intraobserver analysis showed mean variability with deviations of <1 mm and maximum standard deviations of 0.7 mm and ranges of up to 2.3 mm.

Conclusions

We confirmed the hypothesis that the quadrant method has a low inter- and intraobserver variability. Based on the presented validation data, the quadrant method can be recommended as reliable method to radiographically describe insertion areas of the ACL as well as to determine tunnel positions in ACL reconstruction intra and postoperatively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aglietti P, Zaccherotti G, Menchetti PP, De Biase P (1995) A comparison of clinical and radiological parameters with two arthroscopic techniques for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 3(1):2–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Amis AA, Beynnon B, Blankevoort L, Chambat P, Christel P, Durselen L, Friederich N, Grood E, Hertel P, Jakob R et al (1994) Proceedings of the ESSKA scientific workshop on reconstruction of the anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2(3):124–132

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Amis AA, Dawkins GP (1991) Functional anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament. Fibre bundle actions related to ligament replacements and injuries. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73(2):260–267

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bedi A, Maak T, Musahl V, Citak M, O’Loughlin PF, Choi D, Pearle AD (2011) Effect of tibial tunnel position on stability of the knee after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: is the tibial tunnel position most important? Am J Sports Med 39(2):366–373

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bernard M, Hertel P (1996) Intraoperative and postoperative insertion control of anterior cruciate ligament-plasty. A radiologic measuring method (quadrant method). Unfallchirurg 99(5):332–340

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bernard M, Hertel P, Hornung H, Cierpinski T (1997) FTS. Am J Knee Surg 10(1):14–21 (discussion 21-12)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cole J, Brand JC Jr, Caborn DN, Johnson DL (2000) Radiographic analysis of femoral tunnel position in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Knee Surg 13(4):218–222

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Colombet P, Robinson J, Christel P, Franceschi JP, Djian P, Bellier G, Sbihi A (2006) Morphology of anterior cruciate ligament attachments for anatomic reconstruction: a cadaveric dissection and radiographic study. Arthroscopy 22(9):984–992. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2006.04.102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dargel J, Schmidt-Wiethoff R, Fischer S, Mader K, Koebke J, Schneider T (2009) Femoral bone tunnel placement using the transtibial tunnel or the anteromedial portal in ACL reconstruction: a radiographic evaluation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17(3):220–227. doi:10.1007/s00167-008-0639-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Goble EM, Downey DJ, Wilcox TR (1995) Positioning of the tibial tunnel for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 11(6):688–695

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Group M, Wright RW, Huston LJ, Spindler KP, Dunn WR, Haas AK, Allen CR, Cooper DE, DeBerardino TM, Lantz BB, Mann BJ, Stuart MJ (2010) Descriptive epidemiology of the multicenter ACL revision study (MARS) cohort. Am J Sports Med 38(10):1979–1986. doi:10.1177/0363546510378645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Harner CD, Baek GH, Vogrin TM, Carlin GJ, Kashiwaguchi S, Woo SL (1999) Quantitative analysis of human cruciate ligament insertions. Arthroscopy 15(7):741–749

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Harner CD, Marks PH, Fu FH, Irrgang JJ, Silby MB, Mengato R (1994) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: endoscopic versus two-incision technique. Arthroscopy 10(5):502–512

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hohmann E, Bryant A, Tetsworth K (2010) Tunnel positioning in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: how long is the learning curve? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18(11):1576–1582

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hoser C, Tecklenburg K, Kuenzel KH, Fink C (2005) Postoperative evaluation of femoral tunnel position in ACL reconstruction: plain radiography versus computed tomography. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 13(4):256–262. doi:10.1007/s00167-004-0548-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hosseini A, Lodhia P, Van de Velde SK, Asnis PD, Zarins B, Gill TJ, Li G (2012) Tunnel position and graft orientation in failed anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a clinical and imaging analysis. Int Orthop 36(4):845–852. doi:10.1007/s00264-011-1333-4

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Howell SM (1998) Principles for placing the tibial tunnel and avoiding roof im**ement during reconstruction of a torn anterior cruciate ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Off J ESSKA 6(Suppl 1):S49–S55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Iriuchishima T, Ingham SJ, Tajima G, Horaguchi T, Saito A, Tokuhashi Y, Van Houten AH, Aerts MM, Fu FH (2010) Evaluation of the tunnel placement in the anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction: a cadaver study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18(9):1226–1231. doi:10.1007/s00167-010-1128-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jalliard R, Lavallee S, Dessenne V (1998) Computer assisted reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Clin Orthop Relat Res 354:57–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kasten P, Szczodry M, Irrgang J, Kropf E, Costello J, Fu FH (2010) What is the role of intra-operative fluoroscopic measurements to determine tibial tunnel placement in anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18(9):1169–1175. doi:10.1007/s00167-010-1082-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kato Y, Ingham SJ, Kramer S, Smolinski P, Saito A, Fu FH (2010) Effect of tunnel position for anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction on knee biomechanics in a porcine model. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Off J ESSKA 18(1):2–10. doi:10.1007/s00167-009-0916-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kato Y, Maeyama A, Lertwanich P, Wang JH, Ingham SJ, Kramer S, Martins CQ, Smolinski P, Fu FH (2012) Biomechanical comparison of different graft positions for single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Off J ESSKA. doi:10.1007/s00167-012-1951-4

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kawakami Y, Hiranaka T, Matsumoto T, Hida Y, Fukui T, Uemoto H, Doita M, Tsuji M, Kurosaka M, Kuroda R (2012) The accuracy of bone tunnel position using fluoroscopic-based navigation system in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Off J ESSKA 20(8):1503–1510. doi:10.1007/s00167-011-1726-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Klos TV, Banks SA, Habets RJ, Cook FF (2000) Sagittal plane imaging parameters for computer-assisted fluoroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Comput Aided Surg 5(1):28–34. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0150(2000)5:1<28:AID-IGS4>3.0.CO;2-P

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Klos TV, Habets RJ, Banks AZ, Banks SA, Devilee RJ, Cook FF (1998) Computer assistance in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 354:65–69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Klos TV, Harman MK, Habets RJ, Devilee RJ, Banks SA (2000) Locating femoral graft placement from lateral radiographs in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of 3 methods of measuring radiographic images. Arthroscopy 16(5):499–504. doi:10.1053/jars.2000.4634

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Koh J, Koo SS, Leonard J, Kodali P (2006) Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tunnel placement: a radiographic comparison between navigated versus manual ACL reconstruction. Orthopedics 29(10 Suppl):S122–S124

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kopf S, Musahl V, Tashman S, Szczodry M, Shen W, Fu FH (2009) A systematic review of the femoral origin and tibial insertion morphology of the ACL. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17(3):213–219. doi:10.1007/s00167-008-0709-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Loh JC, Fukuda Y, Tsuda E, Steadman RJ, Fu FH, Woo SL (2003) Knee stability and graft function following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison between 11 o’clock and 10 o’clock femoral tunnel placement. 2002 Richard O’Connor Award paper. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg Off Publ Arthrosc Assoc N Am Int Arthrosc Assoc 19(3):297–304. doi:10.1053/jars.2003.50084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Markolf KL, Jackson SR, McAllister DR (2010) A comparison of 11 o’clock versus oblique femoral tunnels in the anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee: knee kinematics during a simulated pivot test. Am J Sports Med 38(5):912–917. doi:10.1177/0363546509358321

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. McConkey MO, Amendola A, Ramme AJ, Dunn WR, Flanigan DC, Britton CL, Group MK, Wolf BR, Spindler KP, Carey JL, Cox CL, Kaeding CC, Wright RW, Matava MJ, Brophy RH, Smith MV, McCarty EC, Vida AF, Wolcott M, Marx RG, Parker RD, Andrish JF, Jones MH (2012) Arthroscopic agreement among surgeons on anterior cruciate ligament tunnel placement. Am J Sports Med 40(12):2737–2746. doi:10.1177/0363546512461740

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Meuffels DE, Reijman M, Verhaar JA (2012) Computer-assisted surgery is not more accurate or precise than conventional arthroscopic ACL reconstruction: a prospective randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. doi:10.2106/JBJS.K.00878

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Moloney G, Araujo P, Rabuck S, Carey R, Rincon G, Zhang X, Harner C (2013) Use of a fluoroscopic overlay to assist arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 41(8):1794–1800. doi:10.1177/0363546513490657

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Musahl V, Burkart A, Debski RE, Van Scyoc A, Fu FH, Woo SL (2003) Anterior cruciate ligament tunnel placement: comparison of insertion site anatomy with the guidelines of a computer-assisted surgical system. Arthroscopy 19(2):154–160. doi:10.1053/jars.2003.50001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Musahl V, Plakseychuk A, VanScyoc A, Sasaki T, Debski RE, McMahon PJ, Fu FH (2005) Varying femoral tunnels between the anatomical footprint and isometric positions: effect on kinematics of the anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee. Am J Sports Med 33(5):712–718. doi:10.1177/0363546504271747

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Picard F, DiGioia AM, Moody J, Martinek V, Fu FH, Rytel M, Nikou C, LaBarca RS, Jaramaz B (2001) Accuracy in tunnel placement for ACL reconstruction. Comparison of traditional arthroscopic and computer-assisted navigation techniques. Comput Aided Surg 6(5):279–289

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Piefer JW, Pflugner TR, Hwang MD, Lubowitz JH (2012) Anterior cruciate ligament femoral footprint anatomy: systematic review of the 21st century literature. Arthroscopy 28(6):872–881. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2011.11.026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Pinczewski LA, Salmon LJ, Jackson WF, von Bormann RB, Haslam PG, Tashiro S (2008) Radiological landmarks for placement of the tunnels in single-bundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90(2):172–179. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.90B2.20104

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Plaweski S, Cazal J, Rosell P, Merloz P (2006) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using navigation: a comparative study on 60 patients. Am J Sports Med 34(4):542–552

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Sadoghi P, Kropfl A, Jansson V, Muller PE, Pietschmann MF, Fischmeister MF (2011) Impact of tibial and femoral tunnel position on clinical results after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 27(3):355–364. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2010.08.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Shafizadeh S, Balke M, Wegener S, Tjardes T, Bouillon B, Hoeher J, Baethis H (2011) Precision of tunnel positioning in navigated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 27(9):1268–1274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Siebold R (2011) The concept of complete footprint restoration with guidelines for single- and double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19(5):699–706

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Siebold R, Ellert T, Metz S, Metz J (2008) Femoral insertions of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament: morphometry and arthroscopic orientation models for double-bundle bone tunnel placement–a cadaver study. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg Off Publ Arthrosc Assoc N Am Int Arthrosc Assoc 24(5):585–592. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2007.12.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Sullivan JP, Matava MJ, Flanigan DC, Gao Y, Britton CL, Amendola A, Group M, Wolf BR (2012) Reliability of tunnel measurements and the quadrant method using fluoroscopic radiographs after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 40(10):2236–2241. doi:10.1177/0363546512458086

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Takahashi M, Doi M, Abe M, Suzuki D, Nagano A (2006) Anatomical study of the femoral and tibial insertions of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of human anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med 34(5):787–792

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Tsuda E, Ishibashi Y, Fukuda A, Yamamoto Y, Tsukada H, Ono S (2010) Tunnel position and relationship to postoperative knee laxity after double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a transtibial technique. Am J Sports Med 38(4):698–706. doi:10.1177/0363546509351561

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Tsukada H, Ishibashi Y, Tsuda E, Fukuda A, Toh S (2008) Anatomical analysis of the anterior cruciate ligament femoral and tibial footprints. J Orthop Sci 13(2):122–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Wright R, Spindler K, Huston L, Amendola A, Andrish J, Brophy R, Carey J, Cox C, Flanigan D, Jones M, Kaeding C, Marx R, Matava M, McCarty E, Parker R, Vidal A, Wolcott M, Wolf B, Dunn W (2011) Revision ACL reconstruction outcomes: MOON cohort. J Knee Surg 24(4):289–294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Yau WP, Fok AW, Yee DK (2013) Tunnel positions in transportal versus transtibial anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a case-control magnetic resonance imaging study. Arthroscopy 29(6):1047–1052. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2013.02.010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Zantop T, Wellmann M, Fu FH, Petersen W (2008) Tunnel positioning of anteromedial and posterolateral bundles in anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: anatomic and radiographic findings. Am J Sports Med 36(1):65–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Cologne Merheim Medical Centre, Witten/Herdecke University, Ostmerheimer Strasse 200, 51109, Cologne, Germany

    Sven Shafizadeh, Maurice Balke & Marc Banerjee

  2. Neurosurgery and Special Pain Therapy, Dr.-Robert-Koch-Str. 18a, 51465, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany

    Stefan Kelz

  3. Orthopaedics and Sports Traumatology, Cologne Merheim Medical Centre, Ostmerheimer Strasse 200, 51109, Cologne, Germany

    Juergen Hoeher

Authors
  1. Sven Shafizadeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Maurice Balke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Stefan Kelz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Juergen Hoeher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Marc Banerjee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sven Shafizadeh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shafizadeh, S., Balke, M., Kelz, S. et al. Low inter- and intraobserver variability allows for reliable tunnel measurement in ACL reconstruction using the quadrant method. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134, 529–536 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-014-1931-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-014-1931-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation