Abstract
Schlieren imaging is particularly suited to measuring density gradients in compressible flowfields and can be used to capture shock waves and expansion fans, as well as the turbulent structures of mixing and wake flows. Conventional schlieren imaging, however, has difficulty clearly capturing such structures in long-duration supersonic combustion test facilities. This is because the severe flow temperatures locally change the refractive index of the window glass that is being used to provide optical access. On the other hand, focusing-schlieren imaging presents the potential of reduced sensitivity to thermal distortion of the windows and to clearly capture the flow structures even during a combustion test. This reduced sensitivity is due the technique’s ability to achieve a narrow depth of focus. As part of this study, a focusing-schlieren system was developed with a depth of focus near ±5 mm and was applied to a direct-connect, continuous-flow type, supersonic combustion test facility with a stagnation temperature near 1200 K. The present system was used to successfully visualize the flowfield inside a dual-mode scramjet. The imaging system captured combustion-induced volumetric expansion of the fuel jet and an anchored bifurcated shock wave at the trailing edge of the ramp fuel injector. This is the first time successful focusing-schlieren measurements have been reported for a dual-mode scramjet.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- a :
-
Unobstructed source image height
- C :
-
Contrast of image
- f # :
-
f-Number of lens
- F :
-
Focal length of the schlieren lens
- H :
-
Ramp injector-surface-normal height
- I ij :
-
Local image intensity
- \(\hat{I}\) :
-
Spatial-average intensity in an interrogation area of a schlieren image
- l :
-
Distance from schlieren lens to object
- l′:
-
Distance from schlieren lens to imaging plane
- L :
-
Distance from schlieren lens to source grid
- L′:
-
Distance from schlieren lens to cutoff grid
- pk:
-
Kernel size for Gaussian filter
- P 0 :
-
Stagnation pressure
- P W :
-
Static wall pressure
- T 0 :
-
Stagnation temperature
- x, y, z :
-
Streamwise, heightwise, and spanwise directions
- α :
-
Filter control parameter
- ε :
-
Refraction angle due to density gradient
- Φ :
-
Fuel equivalence ratio
- σ g :
-
Standard deviation for Gaussian filter
- \(\hat{\sigma }\) :
-
Standard deviation of image intensity in an interrogation area of a schlieren image
References
Babinsky H, Harvey JK (2011) Shock wave-boundary layer interactions. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 55–56
Ben-Yakar A, Hanson RK (2002) Ultra-fast-framing schlieren system for studies of the time evolution of jets in supersonic crossflows. Exp Fluids 32:652–666. doi:10.1007/s00348-002-0405-z
Ben-Yakar A, Mungal MG, Hanson RK (2006) Time evolution and mixing characteristics of hydrogen and ethylene transverse jets in supersonic crossflow. Phys Fluids 18:026101-1–026101-16. doi:10.1063/1.2139684
Brown GL, Roshko A (1974) On density effects and large structure in turbulent mixing layers. J Fluids Mech 64(4):775–816. doi:10.1017/S002211207400190X
Fotia ML, Driscoll JF (2012) Isolator-combustor interactions in a direct-connect ramjet-scramjet experiment. J Prop Power 28(1):83–95. doi:10.2514/1.B34367
Gartenberg E, Weinstein LM, Lee EE Jr (1994) Aerodynamic investigation with focusing schlieren in a cryogenic wind tunnel. AIAA J 32(6):1242–1249. doi:10.2514/3.12126
Kouchi T, Masuya G (2012), Quantification of convection velocity and dominant scale of large-scale structures by high-speed schlieren imaging. In: AIAA-2012-4148. doi:10.2514/6.2012-4148
Kouchi T, Hoshino T, Sasaya S, Masuya G (2009) Time-space trajectory of unsteady jet into supersonic crossflow using high-speed framing schlieren images. In: AIAA-2009-7316. doi:10.2514/6.2009-7316
Krauss RH, McDaniel JC (1992) A clean air continuous flow propulsion facility. In: AIAA-92-3912. doi:10.2514/6.1992-3912
Laurence SJ, Schramm JM, Karl S, Hannemann K (2011) An experimental investigation of steady and unsteady combustion phenomena in the HyShot II combustor. In: AIAA-2011-2310. doi:10.2514/6.2011-2310
Matsuo K, Miyazato Y, Kim HD (1999) Shock train and pseudo-shock phenomena in internal gas flows. Prog Aerosp Sci 35(1):33–100. doi:10.1016/S0376-0421(98)00011-6
Rockwell RD, Goyne CP, Rice BE, Kouchi T, McDaniel JC, Edwards JR (2014) Collaborative experimental and computational study of a dual-mode scramjet combustor. J Propuls Power 30(3):530–538. doi:10.2514/1.B35021
Settles GS (2001) Schlieren and shadowgraph techniques. Springer, New York, pp 88–103
VanDercreek C, Smith M, Yu K (2010) Focused schlieren and Deflectometry at AEDC hypervelocity wind tunnel No. 9. AIAA-2010-4209. In: 27th AIAA Aerodynamic measurement technology and ground testing conference, Chicago, Illinois, 28 June–1 July 2010
Weinstein LM (2010) Review and update of lens and grid schlieren and motion camera schlieren. Euro Phys J 182:65–95. doi:10.1140/epjst/e2010-01226-y
Weiss A, Grzona A, Olivier H (2010) Behavior of shock trains in a diverging duct. Exp Fluids 49:355–365. doi:10.1007/s00348-009-0764-9
Acknowledgments
The authors appreciate the assistant of Dr. Roland Krauss and Mr. Roger Reynolds in operating the supersonic combustion facility. This work was supported by Young Researcher Oversea Study Program of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. This research was also supported by the National Center for Hypersonic Combined Cycle Propulsion Grant FA 9550-09-1-0611. The technical monitors on the Grant were Chi** Li (AFOSR), and Aaron Auslender and Rick Gaffney (NASA).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kouchi, T., Goyne, C.P., Rockwell, R.D. et al. Focusing-schlieren visualization in a dual-mode scramjet. Exp Fluids 56, 211 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-015-2081-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-015-2081-9