Log in

Einsatzmöglichkeiten intraokularer Multifokallinsen und Kriterien der Patientenselektion

Use of multifocal intraocular lenses and criteria for patient selection

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Ophthalmologe Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Im Rahmen der verschiedenen Ansätze zur Korrektur der Presbyopie werden immer häufiger multifokale Intraokularlinsen (MIOL) eingesetzt. Um eine hohe Patientenzufriedenheit zu erzielen, sind genaue Kenntnisse über Einsatzmöglichkeiten und Patientenselektionskriterien dieses Linsentyps erforderlich. Relativ restriktive Einschlusskriterien in Zusammenspiel mit einem optimierten prä-, peri-, und postoperativen Management führen in der Summe zu besseren refraktiven Ergebnissen und damit zu einer hohen Patientenzufriedenheit.

Abstract

Multifocal intraocular lenses (MIOL) are increasingly being used as a therapeutic approach to correct presbyopia. To guarantee patient satisfaction, it is important to be aware of the different IOL properties and patient inclusion criteria. A differentiated patient selection in combination with optimized perioperative and postoperative management is necessary to achieve appropriate postoperative refractive results and patient satisfaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5

Literatur

  1. Alfonso JF, Fernandez-Vega L, Baamonde MB, Montes-Mico R (2007) Correlation of pupil size with visual acuity and contrast sensitivity after implantation of an apodized diffractive intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 33: 430–438

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Alfonso JF, Fernandez-Vega L, Baamonde MB, Montes-Mico R (2007) Prospective visual evaluation of apodized diffractive intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 33: 1235–1243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Alfonso JF, Fernandez-Vega L, Senaris A, Montes-Mico R (2007) Prospective study of the Acri.LISA bifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 33: 1930–1935

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Alfonso JF, Fernandez-Vega L, Senaris A, Montes-Mico R (2007) Quality of vision with the Acri.Twin asymmetric diffractive bifocal intraocular lens system. J Cataract Refract Surg 33: 197–202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Artigas JM, Menezo JL, Peris C et al. (2007) Image quality with multifocal intraocular lenses and the effect of pupil size: comparison of refractive and hybrid refractive-diffractive designs. J Cataract Refract Surg 33: 2111–2117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Auffarth GU, Dick HB (2001) Multifokale Intraokularlinsen. Eine Übersicht. Ophthalmologe 98: 127–137

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Blaylock JF, Si Z, Vickers C (2006) Visual and refractive status at different focal distances after implantation of the ReSTOR multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 32: 1464–1473

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bradley MJ, Coombs J, Olson RJ (2006) Analysis of an approach to astigmatism correction during cataract surgery. Ophthalmologica 220: 311–316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chiam PJ, Chan JH, Haider SI et al. (2007) Functional vision with bilateral ReZoom and ReSTOR intraocular lenses 6 months after cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 33: 2057–2061

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cumming JS, Colvard DM, Dell SJ et al. (2006) Clinical evaluation of the Crystalens AT-45 accommodating intraocular lens: results of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration clinical trial. J Cataract Refract Surg 32: 812–825

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Goes FJ (2008) Refractive lens exchange with the diffractive multifocal Tecnis ZM900 intraocular lens. J Refract Surg 24: 243–250

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Holzer MP, Rabsilber TM, Auffarth GU (2006) Presbyopia correction using intraocular lenses. Ophthalmologe 103: 661–666

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Keates RH, Pearce JL, Schneider RT (1987) Clinical results of the multifocal lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 13: 557–560

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kohnen T, Derhartunian V (2007) Apodisierte Diffraktionsoptik. Neues Konzept in der Multifokallinsentechnologie. Ophthalmologe 104: 899–904, 906–907

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kohnen T, Kuhne C, Cichocki M, Strenger A (2007) Zyklorotation des Auges bei wellenfrontgeführter LASIK mit statischem Iriserkennungstracker. Ophthalmologe 104: 60–65

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kohnen T, Allen D, Boureau C et al. (2006) European multicenter study of the AcrySof ReSTOR apodized diffractive intraocular lens. Ophthalmology 113: 584 e1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pepose JS, Qazi MA, Davies J et al. (2007) Visual performance of patients with bilateral vs combination Crystalens, ReZoom, and ReSTOR intraocular lens implants. Am J Ophthalmol 144: 347–357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Kohnen F.E.B.O..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kohnen, T., Kook, D., Auffarth, G. et al. Einsatzmöglichkeiten intraokularer Multifokallinsen und Kriterien der Patientenselektion. Ophthalmologe 105, 527–532 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-008-1745-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-008-1745-8

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation