Log in

Impact of the presence of a median lobe on functional outcomes of greenlight photovaporization of the prostate (PVP): an analysis of the Global Greenlight Group (GGG) Database

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

Previous analyses of the impact of median lobe presence on Greenlight photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) outcomes were limited by their small sample size and the ability to adjust for important confounders. As such, we sought to investigate the impact of prostate median lobe presence on the operative outcomes of 180 W XPS GreenLight PVP using a large international database.

Methods

Data were obtained from the Global GreenLight Group (GGG) database which pools data of eight high-volume, experienced surgeons, from a total of seven international centers. All men with established benign prostatic hyperplasia who underwent GreenLight PVP using the XPS-180 W system between 2011 and 2019 were eligible for the study. Patients were assigned to two groups based on presence or absence of median lobes. Analyses were adjusted for patient age, prostate volume, body mass index, and American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) score.

Results

A total of 1650 men met the inclusion criteria. A median lobe was identified in 621 (37.6%) patients. Baseline prostate volume, patient age, and ASA score varied considerably between the two groups. In adjusted analyses, the operative and lasing time of patients with median lobes was 6.72 (95% CI 3.22–10.23; p < 0.01) minutes and 2.90 (95% CI 1.02–4.78; p < 0.01) minutes longer than the control group. Men with median lobes had similar postoperative functional outcomes to those without a median lobe except for a 1.59-point greater drop in the 12-month IPSS score compared to baseline (95% CI 0.11–3.08; p = 0.04) in the median lobe group, and a decrease in PVR after 6 months which was 46.51 ml (95% CI 4.65–88.36; p = 0.03) greater in patients with median lobes compared to men without median lobes.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that the presence of a median lobe has no clinically significant impact on procedural or postoperative outcomes for patients undergoing Greenlight PVP using the XPS-180 W system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bachmann A, Tubaro A, Barber N et al (2014) 180-W XPSgreenlight laser vaporisation versus transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic obstruction: 6-month safety and efficacy results of a European multicentre randomised trial—The GOLIATH study. EurUrol 65:931–942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2013.10.040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Foster HE, Barry MJ, Dahm P et al (2019) Re: Surgical management of lower urinary tract symptoms attributed to benign prostatic hyperplasia: AUA Guideline. J Urol 203:1219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2018.09.058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brunken C, Seitz C, Woo HH (2015) A systematic review of experience of 180-W XPSGreenLight laser vaporisation of the prostate in 1640 men. BJU Int 116:531–537. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.12955

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ghobrial FK, Shoma A, Elshal AM et al (2020) A randomized trial comparing bipolar transurethral vaporization of the prostate with GreenLight laser (xps-180watt) photoselective vaporization of the prostate for treatment of small to moderate benign prostatic obstruction: outcomes after 2 years. BJU Int 125:144–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.14926

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hueber PA, Bienz MN, Valdivieso R et al (2015) Photoselective vaporization of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia using the 180 watt system: multicenter study of the impact of prostate size on safety and outcomes. J Urol 194:462–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.03.113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Valdivieso R, Hueber PA, Meskawi M et al (2018) Multicentre international experience of 532-nm laser photoselective vaporization with GreenLightXPS in men with very large prostates. BJU Int 122:873–878. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.14208

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Stone BV, Chughtai B, Kaplan SA et al (2015) GreenLight laser for prostates over 100 ml: what is the evidence? CurrOpinUrol 26:28–34. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0000000000000237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Meskawi M, Hueber PA, Valdivieso R et al (2019) Complications and functional outcomes of high-risk patient with cardiovascular disease on antithrombotic medication treated with the 532-nm-laser photo-vaporization GreenlightXPS-180 W for benign prostate hyperplasia. World J Urol 37:1671–1678. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2560-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nguyen DD, Misraï V, Bach T et al (2020) Operative time comparison of aquablation, greenlightPVP, ThuLEP, GreenLEP, and HoLEP. World J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03137-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Audouin M, Girshovich A, Cussenot O, Renard-Penna R (2018) Typology of intravesical prostatic protrusions, or so-called median lobes, in middle-aged and older men. SurgRadiolAnat 40:389–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-018-1999-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lieber MM, Jacobson DJ, McGree ME et al (2009) Intravesical prostatic protrusion in men in Olmsted County, Minnesota. J Urol 182:2819–2824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.08.086

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Bodokh Y, Treacy PJ, Imbert de la Phalecque L, Durand M (2018) Does prostate median lobe really matter for GreenLightHPS laser photovaporization of the prostate. J Endourol Case Rep 4:169–172. https://doi.org/10.1089/cren.2018.0053

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Zorn KC, Liberman D (2011) GreenLight180WXPSphotovaporization of the prostate: how I do it. Can J Urol 18:5918–5926

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Law KW, Elterman DS, Cash H et al (2019) Anatomic GreenLight laser vaporization-incision technique for benign prostatic hyperplasia using the XPSLBO-180W system: how I do it. Can J Urol 26:9963–9972

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wee JH, Choi YS, Bae WJ et al (2012) Influence of intravesical prostatic protrusion on preoperative lower urinary tract symptoms and outcomes after 120 W high performance system laser treatment in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Korean J Urol 53:472–477. https://doi.org/10.4111/kju.2012.53.7.472

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim KS, Choi SW, Bae WJ et al (2015) Efficacy of a vaporization–resection of the prostate median lobe enlargement and vaporization of the prostate lateral lobe for benign prostatic hyperplasia using a 120-W GreenLight high-performance system laser: the effect on storage symptoms. Lasers Med Sci 30:1387–1393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-015-1740-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hojgaard M, Mikines KJ (2010) Ureteral injuries during photoselective vaporization of the prostate. Scand J UrolNephrol 44:265–268. https://doi.org/10.3109/00365591003645712

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gu X, Strom K, Spaliviero M, Wong C (2013) Does prostate configuration affect the efficacy and safety of GreenLightHPSTM laser photoselective vaporization prostatectomy (PVP)? Lasers Med Sci 28:473–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-012-1085-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim MS, Park KK, Chung BH, Lee SH (2013) Effect of photoselective vaporization prostatectomy on lower urinary tract symptoms in benign prostatic hyperplasia with or without intravesical prostatic protrusion. Korean J Urol 54:36–41. https://doi.org/10.4111/kju.2013.54.1.36

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Law K, Tholomier C, Couture F et al (2020) PD61-07 Global Greenlight Group. J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1097/ju.0000000000000978.07

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gratzke C, Bachmann A, Descazeaud A et al (2015) EAU guidelines on the assessment of non-neurogenic male lower urinary tract symptoms including benign prostatic obstruction. EurUrol 67:1099–1109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.12.038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nickel JC, Aaron L, Barkin J et al (2018) Canadian Urological Association guideline on male lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic hyperplasia (MLUTS/BPH): 2018 update. Can UrolAssoc J 12:303–312. https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.5616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Eri LM, Thomassen H, Brennhovd B, Håheim LL (2002) Accuracy and repeatability of prostate volume measurements by transrectal ultrasound. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 5:273–278. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.pcan.4500568

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang X (2014) Firth logistic regression for rare variant association tests. Front Genet 5:187. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2014.00187

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Doo CK, Uh HS (2009) Anatomic configuration of prostate obtained by noninvasive ultrasonography can predict clinical voiding parameters for determining BOO in men with LUTS. Urology 73:232–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2008.09.055

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Zheng J, Pan J, Qin Y et al (2015) Role for intravesical prostatic protrusion in lower urinary tract symptom: a fluid structural interaction analysis study. BMC Urol 15:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-015-0081-y

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Mariappan P, Brown DJG, McNeill AS (2007) Intravesical prostatic protrusion is better than prostate volume in predicting the outcome of trial without catheter in white men presenting with acute urinary retention: a prospective clinical study. J Urol 178:573–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Park HY, Lee JY, Park SY et al (2012) Efficacy of alpha blocker treatment according to the degree of intravesical prostatic protrusion detected by transrectal ultrasonography in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Korean J Urol 53:92–97. https://doi.org/10.4111/kju.2012.53.2.92

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Yoshida T, Kinoshita H, Yoshida K et al (2016) Intravesical prostatic protrusion as a predicting factor for the adverse clinical outcome in patients with symptomatic benign prostatic enlargement treated with dutasteride. Urology 91:154–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2016.01.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

DDN protocol/project development, data collection or management, data analysis, manuscript writing/editing. IS protocol/project development, data collection or management, data analysis, manuscript writing/editing. KL protocol/project development, data collection or management, manuscript writing/editing. NB protocol/project development, manuscript writing/editing. DSE: Protocol/project development, manuscript writing/editing. ASZ protocol/project development, manuscript writing/editing. AA protocol/project development, manuscript writing/editing. FB Protocol/project development, manuscript writing/editing. LC protocol/project development, manuscript writing/editing. GF protocol/project development, manuscript writing/editing. CVL protocol/project development, manuscript writing/editing. TBB protocol/project development, manuscript writing/editing. EFB protocol/project development, manuscript writing/editing. HC protocol/project development, manuscript writing/editing. MR protocol/project development, manuscript writing/editing. ER protocol/project development, manuscript writing/editing. VM protocol/project development, manuscript writing/editing. KCZ protocol/project development, data collection or management, data analysis, manuscript writing/editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin C. Zorn.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Consultants and proctors for Boston Scientific for greenlight: KZ, DSE, VM, ER, HC. Investigators and consultants for PROCEPT BioRobotics: VM, TB, NB, KZ. Surgical tutors for Greenlight Xcelerated Performance System (American Medical System-AMS, Minnetonka, MN) and received honoraria for their tutorship: GF, LC. All other authors do not report any relevant conflicts of interest.

Ethics approval

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

For this type of study, formal consent is not required (retrospective study).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nguyen, DD., Sadri, I., Law, K. et al. Impact of the presence of a median lobe on functional outcomes of greenlight photovaporization of the prostate (PVP): an analysis of the Global Greenlight Group (GGG) Database. World J Urol 39, 3881–3889 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03529-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03529-w

Keywords

Navigation