Log in

Assessment of the learning curves for photoselective vaporization of the prostate using GreenLight™ 180-Watt-XPS laser therapy: defining the intra-operative parameters within a prospective cohort

  • Topic Paper
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the learning curves for the intra-operative parameters of the GreenLight™ 180-W XPS for photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP).

Methods

A prospective study was conducted on 200 men who underwent PVP using the GreenLight™ 180-W XPS over 20 months. The population was divided into four consecutive equal groups. Evolution of lasing parameters was the main endpoint to reach an average energy of 5 kJ per prostate volume and to reach a lasing time/operative time (LT/OT) ratio of 66–80 %. Changes in the IPSS and prostate volume were also evaluated 12 weeks later.

Results

Total energy delivered (energy/ml of prostate) and the LT/OT ratio significantly increased over time (p < 0.05). Urinary function significantly improved from baseline in all groups. The first lasing parameter endpoint was reached after the 75th patient (group 1) and the second endpoint (LT/OT ratio) after the 125th patient (group 3). Only the PSA level (p = 0.04) and prostate volume (p < 0.0001) decreased significantly in the 3rd and the 4th group. Post-operative complications occurred in 20 % of patients, which were primarily Clavien–Dindo grades 1 and 2, though there were no statistical differences between the four groups (p = 0.62). In-hospital stay and time to catheter removal were significantly shorter in the 3rd and 4th group.

Conclusions

The current study assessed the PVP learning curves within multiple intra-operative parameters. The PVP learning curves required at least 120 procedures until it met all intra-operative parameters of experts in this field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Herrmann TR, Liatsikos EN, Nagele U, Traxer O, Merseburger AS, Eau Guidelines Panel on Lasers T (2012) EAU guidelines on laser technologies. Eur Urol 61:783–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Oelke M, Bachmann A, Descazeaud A, Emberton M, Gravas S, Michel MC, et al. (2013) EAU guidelines on the treatment and follow-up of non-neurogenic male lower urinary tract symptoms including benign prostatic obstruction. Eur Urol

  3. Thangasamy IA, Chalasani V, Bachmann A, Woo HH (2012) Photoselective vaporisation of the prostate using 80-W and 120-W laser versus transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review with meta-analysis from 2002 to 2012. Eur Urol 62:315–323

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zorn KC, Liberman D (2011) GreenLight 180W XPS photovaporization of the prostate: how I do it. Can J Urol 18:5918–5926

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gomez Sancha F, Bachmann A, Choi BB, Tabatabaei S, Muir GH (2007) Photoselective vaporization of the prostate (GreenLight PV): lessons learnt after 3,500 procedures. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 10:316–322

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lukacs B, Loeffler J, Bruyere F, Blanchet P, Gelet A, Coloby P et al (2012) Photoselective vaporization of the prostate with GreenLight 120-W laser compared with monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Eur Urol 61:1165–1173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Woo HH, Hossack TA (2011) Photoselective vaporization for prostatic obstruction with the 120-W lithium triborate laser: 1-year clinical outcomes. Int J Urol 18:162–165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Descazeaud A, Robert G, Delongchamps NB, Cornu JN, Saussine C, Haillot O et al (2012) Initial assessment, follow-up and treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms related to benign prostatic hyperplasia: guidelines of the LUTS committee of the French Urological Association. Prog Urol 22:977–988

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Portalez D, Mozer P, Cornud F, Renard-Penna R, Misrai V, Thoulouzan M et al (2012) Validation of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology scoring system for prostate cancer diagnosis on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in a cohort of repeat biopsy patients. Eur Urol 62:986–996

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Malek RS, Kuntzman RS, Barrett DM (2000) High power potassium-titanyl-phosphate laser vaporization prostatectomy. J Urol 163:1730–1733

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Reich O, Bachmann A, Siebels M, Hofstetter A, Stief CG, Sulser T (2005) High power (80W) potassium-titanyl-phosphate laser vaporization of the prostate in 66 high risk patients. J Urol 173:158–160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shah HN, Mahajan AP, Sodha HS, Hegde S, Mohile PD, Bansal MB (2007) Prospective evaluation of the learning curve for holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. J Urol 177:1468–1474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bachmann A, Muir GH, Collins EJ, Choi BB, Tabatabaei S, Reich OM et al (2012) 180-W XPS GreenLight laser therapy for benign prostate hyperplasia: early safety, efficacy, and perioperative outcome after 201 procedures. Eur Urol 61:600–607

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Capitan C, Blazquez C, Martin MD, Hernandez V, de la Pena E, Llorente C (2011) GreenLight HPS 120-W laser vaporization versus transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomized clinical trial with 2-year follow-up. Eur Urol 60:734–739

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mamoulakis C, Efthimiou I, Kazoulis S, Christoulakis I, Sofras F (2011) The modified Clavien classification system: a standardized platform for reporting complications in transurethral resection of the prostate. World J Urol 29:205–210

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mitropoulos D, Artibani W, Graefen M, Remzi M, Roupret M, Truss M et al (2012) Reporting and grading of complications after urologic surgical procedures: an ad hoc EAU guidelines panel assessment and recommendations. Eur Urol 61:341–349

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Naspro R, Bachmann A, Gilling P, Kuntz R, Madersbacher S, Montorsi F et al (2009) A review of the recent evidence (2006–2008) for 532-nm photoselective laser vaporisation and holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. Eur Urol 55:1345–1357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Elzayat EA, Elhilali MM (2007) Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP): long-term results, reoperation rate, and possible impact of the learning curve. Eur Urol 52:1465–1471

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Seki N, Nomura H, Yamaguchi A, Naito S (2008) Evaluation of the learning curve for photoselective vaporization of the prostate over the course of 74 cases. J Endourol 22:1731–1735

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Herlemann A, Stritmatter F, Buchner A, Karl A, Reich O, Bachmann A, et al. (2013) Virtual Reality Systems in Urologic Surgery: An Evaluation of the GreenLight Simulator. Eur Urol: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2013.06.008

  21. Ruszat R, Seitz M, Wyler SF, Abe C, Rieken M, Reich O et al (2008) GreenLight laser vaporization of the prostate: single-center experience and long-term results after 500 procedures. Eur Urol 54:893–901

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Alivizatos G, Skolarikos A, Chalikopoulos D, Papachristou C, Sopilidis O, Dellis A et al (2008) Transurethral photoselective vaporization versus transvesical open enucleation for prostatic adenomas >80 ml: 12-mo results of a randomized prospective study. Eur Urol 54:427–437

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Reich O (2008) Editorial comment on: transurethral photoselective vaporization versus transvesical open enucleation for prostatic adenomas >80 ml: 12-mo results of a randomized prospective study. Eur Urol 54:436–437

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vincent Misraï.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Misraï, V., Faron, M., Guillotreau, J. et al. Assessment of the learning curves for photoselective vaporization of the prostate using GreenLight™ 180-Watt-XPS laser therapy: defining the intra-operative parameters within a prospective cohort. World J Urol 32, 539–544 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-013-1163-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-013-1163-7

Keywords

Navigation