Log in

MDCT of the abdominal aorta: basics, technical improvements, and clinical applications

  • Advances in Vascular and Cardiac MDCT Imaging
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusion

Multiple diagnostic techniques have been proposed for the evaluation of the abdominal aorta and iliac arteries so as to avoid the use of DSA.

The development of MDCT has improved the assessment of the aorta and its branches allowing increasingly faster acquisition of thin sections. The increasing speed of the acquisition requires more attentive administration of iodinated contrast agent, at higher flow rates and with higher iodine concentration so that a homogeneous enhancement throughout the acquisition is achieved. Compared to other techniques, MDCT angiography has several advantages related to transverse data acquisition and the possibility of performing multiplanar interactive reconstructions. Furthermore, the rapid diffusion of MDCT scanners worldwide, not followed by the diffusion of high-field-strenght MR systems, enable to perform high quality MR angiography, has allowed an increasing number of CT angiography examinations to be performed.

There are two major limitations of MDCT angiography in the evaluation of patients with peripheral arterial disease: the use of ionizing radiation and iodinated contrast agents. Regarding the radiation issue, it has been recently noted that it is not that important in older individuals who are the typical patients with peripheral arteriopathy, and that the radiation dose, compared with that of DSA, is significantly lower. Furthermore, as shown in other areas, it might be possible to reduce the radiation dose to the patient by optimizing the acquisition protocol. Concerning the use of iodinated contrast agents, it must be noted that several patients present with poor renal function and cannot tolerate administration of a possibly nephrotoxic agent; nevertheless, the nephrotoxicity of nonionic contrast agents has been significantly reduced as compared with ionic contrast agents and their administration can be considered safe and well tolerated, even in high-risk populations. Furthermore, the amount of iodinated contrast agent needed for MDCT angiography is significantly lower than that of single-slice spiral CT angiography, and the further increase in speed of new multidetector-row CTs will allow the use of even smaller amounts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Prokop M (2000) Multislice CT angiography. Eur J Radiol 36(2):86–96. Review

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Prokop M (2003) General principles of MDCT. Eur J Radiol 45 Suppl 1:S4-S10. Review

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hittmair K, Fleischmann D. (2001) Accuracy of predicting and controlling time-dependent aortic enhancement from a test bolus injection. J Comput Assist Tomogr 25(2):287–94

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Macari M, Israel GM, Berman P, Lisi M, Tolia AJ, Adelman M, Megibow AJ (2001) Infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms at multi-detector row CT angiography: intravascular enhancement without a timing acquisition. Radiology 220(2):519–23

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bae KT (2003) Peak contrast enhancement in CT and MR angiography: when does it occur and why? Pharmacokinetic study in a porcine model. Radiology 227 (3):809–16. Epub 2003 Apr 17

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim S, Kim JH, Han JK, Lee KH, Min BG (2000) Prediction of optimal injection protocol for tumor detection in contrastenhanced dynamic hepatic CT using simulation of lesion-to-liver contrast difference. Comput Med Imaging Graph 24(5):317–27

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rieker O, Duber C, Schmiedt W, Neufang A, Pitto M, Schweden F (1996) CT angiography versus intra-arterial DSA in abdominal aortic aneurysms. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 165(1):17–23

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Van Hoe L, Baert AL, Gryspeerdt S, Marchal G, Lacroix H, Wilms G, Mertens L (1996) Supra-and juxtarenal aneurysms of the abdominal aorta: preoperative assessment with thin-section spiral CT. Radiology 198(2):443–8

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Willmann JK, Wildermuth S, Pfammatter T, Roos JE, Seifert B, Hilfiker PR, Marincek B, Weishaupt D (2003) Aortoiliac and renal arteries: prospective intraindividual comparision of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography and multi-detector row CT angiography. Radiology 226(3):798–811

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zeman RK, Silverman PM, Berman PM, Weltman DI, Davros WJ, Gomes MN (1994) Abdominal aortic aneurysms: evaluation with variable-collimation helical CT and overlap** reconstruction. Radiology 193(2):555–60

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Zeman RK, Berman PM, Silverman PM, Davros WJ, Cooper C, Kladakis AO, Gomes MN (1995) Diagnosis of aortic dissection: value of helical CT with multiplanar reformation and three-dimensional rendering. AJR Am J Roentgenol 164(6):1375–80

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Catalano, C., Fraioli, F., Danti, M. et al. MDCT of the abdominal aorta: basics, technical improvements, and clinical applications. Eur Radiol 13 (Suppl 3), N53–N58 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-003-0008-y

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-003-0008-y

Keywords

Navigation