Log in

Concurrent p16 methylation pattern as an adverse prognostic factor in multiple myeloma: a methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction study using two different primer sets

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Hematology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Disruption of cell cycle control genes, including p16, is known to contribute to the cancerogenesis of multiple myeloma (MM). We investigated the methylation status of p16 and its association with common cytogenetic changes, clinicolaboratory findings, and survival in MM. Methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction was performed in 99 newly diagnosed MM patients using two different sets of primers (p16M1 and p16M2). Four patterns of p16 promoter methylation were observed: (1) concurrent methylation of p16M1 and p16M2 (P1P2), 27.3%; (2) methylation of p16M1 alone (P1N2), 7.1%; (3) methylation of p16M2 alone (N1P2), 26.3%; and (4) no methylation (N1N2), 39.4%. Patients with p16P1P1 showed shorter survivals than those with the other methylation patterns (P1N2, N1P2, or N1N2; median survival, 12 vs. 43 months; P < 0.001), regardless of the treatment protocol. In a multivariate analysis, p16P1P2 was an independent prognostic factor of adverse outcome in MM. According to International Staging System (ISS), the study population could be divided into 21.2% (20/94) for stage I, 22.3% (21/94) for stage II, and 56.4% (53/94) for stage III (P = 0.003). ISS can divide patients into prognostic groups. Of note, in patients older than 60 years, ISS was not reflective of disease stage (P = 0.114). If p16P1P2 sets up as stage 4 of ISS, modified ISS could be a more reliable staging system irrespective of age in Korean MM patients (P = 0.003 and P = 0.004 in patients younger than 60 years and in patients older than 60 years, respectively). Our study suggests the potential use of p16 methylation status in predicting the outcome of MM patients and the applicability of demethylating agents in MM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gonzalez-Zulueta M, Bender CM, Yang AS et al (1995) Methylation of the 5′ CpG island of the p16/CDKN2 tumor suppressor gene in normal and transformed human tissues correlates with gene silencing. Cancer Res 55:4531–4535

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Merlo A, Herman JG, Mao L et al (1995) 5′ CpG island methylation is associated with transcriptional silencing of the tumour suppressor p16/CDKN2/MTS1 in human cancers. Nat Med 1:686–692

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jones PL, Wolffe AP (1999) Relationships between chromatin organization and DNA methylation in determining gene expression. Semin Cancer Biol 9:339–347

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kass SU, Pruss D, Wolffe AP (1997) How does DNA methylation repress transcription? Trends Genet 13:444–449

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Galm O, Wilop S, Reichelt J et al (2004) DNA methylation changes in multiple myeloma. Leukemia 18:1687–1692

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Guillerm G, Depil S, Wolowiec D, Quesnel B (2003) Different prognostic values of p15(INK4b) and p16(INK4a) gene methylations in multiple myeloma. Haematologica 88:476–478

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Seidl S, Ackermann J, Kaufmann H et al (2004) DNA-methylation analysis identifies the E-cadherin gene as a potential marker of disease progression in patients with monoclonal gammopathies. Cancer 100:2598–2606

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Uchida T, Kinoshita T, Ohno T, Ohashi H, Nagai H, Saito H (2001) Hypermethylation of p16INK4A gene promoter during the progression of plasma cell dyscrasia. Leukemia 15:157–165

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cim CS, Fung TK, Liang R (2003) Disruption of INK4/CDK/Rb cell cycle pathway by gene hypermethylation in multiple myeloma and MGUS. Leukemia 17:2533–2535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chim CS, Liang R, Leung MH et al (2006) Aberrant gene promoter methylation marking disease progression in multiple myeloma. Leukemia 20:1190–1192

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Furonaka O, Takeshima Y, Awaya H, Ishida H, Kohno N, Inai K (2004) Aberrant methylation of p14(ARF), p15(INK4b) and p16(INK4a) genes and location of the primary site in pulmonary squamous cell carcinoma. Pathol Int 54(8):549–555

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. **ng EP, Nie Y, Song Y, Yang GY, Cai YC, Wang LD, Yang CS (1999) Mechanisms of inactivation of p14ARF, p15INK4b, and p16INK4a genes in human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 5:2704–2713

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gonzalez-Paz N, Chng WJ, McClure RF et al (2007) Tumor suppressor p16 methylation in multiple myeloma: biological and clinical implications. Blood 109:1228–1232

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mateos MV, Garcia-Sanz R, Lopez-Perez R et al (2002) Methylation is an inactivating mechanism of the p16 gene in multiple myeloma associated with hIgH plasma cell proliferation and short survival. Br J Haematol 118:1034–1040

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. San-Miguel J, Garcia-Sanz R, Lopez-Perez R (2005) Analysis of methylation pattern in multiple myeloma. Acta Haematol 114(Suppl 1):23–26

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Herman JG, Graff JR, Myohanen S, Nelkin BD, Baylin SB (1996) Methylation-specific PCR: a novel PCR assay for methylation status of CpG islands. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:9821–9826

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dib A, Barlogie B, Shaughnessy JD Jr, Kuehl WM (2007) Methylation and expression of the p16INK4A tumor suppressor gene in multiple myeloma. Blood 109:1337–1338

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gonzalez M, Mateos MV, Garcia-Sanz R et al (2000) De novo methylation of tumor suppressor gene p16/INK4a is a frequent finding in multiple myeloma patients at diagnosis. Leukemia 14:183–187

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mateos MV, Gonzalez M, Balanzategui A et al (2000) Status of methylation of p16 gene in multiple myeloma: a comparative study of three methods for its detection. Clin Biochem 33:415–418

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ribas C, Colleoni GW, Felix RS et al (2005) p16 gene methylation lacks correlation with angiogenesis and prognosis in multiple myeloma. Cancer Lett 222:247–254

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Richardson PG, Barlogie B, Berenson J et al (2003) A phase 2 study of bortezomib in relapsed, refractory myeloma. N Engl J Med 348:2609–2617

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Barlogie B, Smith L, Alexanian R (1984) Effective treatment of advanced multiple myeloma refractory to alkylating agents. N Engl J Med 310:1353–1356

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rajkumar SV, Hayman S, Gertz MA et al (2002) Combination therapy with thalidomide plus dexamethasone for newly diagnosed myeloma. J Clin Oncol 20:4319–4323

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Palumbo A, Bertola A, Falco P et al (2004) Efficacy of low-dose thalidomide and dexamethasone as first salvage regimen in multiple myeloma. Hematol J 5:318–324

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Aplenc R, Orudjev E, Swoyer J, Manke B, Rebbeck T (2002) Differential bone marrow aspirate DNA yields from commercial extraction kits. Leukemia 16:1865–1866

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Czepulkowski B (2001) Basic techniques for the preparation and analysis of chromosomes from bone marrow and leukaemic blood. In: Rooney DE (ed) Human cytogenetics: malignancy and acquired abnormalities, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1–26

    Google Scholar 

  27. Shaffer LG, Tommerup N (eds) (2005) ISCN 2005: an international system for human cytogenetic nomenclature. S. Karger, Basel

    Google Scholar 

  28. Greipp PR, San Miguel J, Durie BG et al (2005) International staging system for multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol 23:3412–3420

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Silva J, Silva JM, Dominguez G et al (2003) Concomitant expression of p16INK4a and p14ARF in primary breast cancer and analysis of inactivation mechanisms. J Pathol 199:289–297

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Tost J, Gut IG (2007) DNA methylation analysis by pyrosequencing. Nat Protoc 2:2265–2275

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wilborn F, Schmidt CA, Siegert W (1993) Demonstration of chimerism after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation by polymerase chain reaction of Y-chromosome-specific nucleotide sequences—characterization of a new technical approach. Leukemia 7:140–143

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was supported in part by (1) the National R&D Program for Cancer Control, Ministry of Health, Welfare and Family Affairs, Republic of Korea (0720440), and (2) the Korea Science and Engineering Foundation (KOSEF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology (20100020584). Tae Young Kim and Bora Oh are grateful for being awarded a BK21 fellowship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dong Soon Lee.

Additional information

Geon Park and Seong Ho Kang contributed equally as first authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Park, G., Kang, S.H., Lee, J.H. et al. Concurrent p16 methylation pattern as an adverse prognostic factor in multiple myeloma: a methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction study using two different primer sets. Ann Hematol 90, 73–79 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-010-1043-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-010-1043-9

Keywords

Navigation