SpringerLink
Log in

Advancement Flap for Treatment of Complex Cryptoglandular Anal Fistula: Prediction of Therapy Success or Failure Using Anamnestic and Clinical Parameters

  • Original Scientific Report
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Multiple new procedures for treatment of complex anal fistula have been described in the past decades, but an ideal single technique has yet not been identified. Factors that predict the outcome are required to identify the best procedure for each individual patient. The aim of this study was to find those predictors for advancement flap at midterm follow-up.

Methods

From 2012 to 2015 in a tertiary university clinic, all patients who underwent advancement flap for treatment of complex cryptoglandular fistula were prospectively enrolled. Pre- and postoperatively standardized anamnestic and clinical examinations were performed. Predictive factors for therapy failure were identified using univariate and multivariate analysis.

Results

Out of 65 patients, 61 (93%) completed all examinations and were included in the study. Therapy failure after a mean follow-up period of 25 months occurred in total n = 11 patients (18%). There was no significant disturbance of continence among the entire study cohort as shown by the incontinence score (preop 0.34 ± 0.91 pts., postop 0.37 ± 0.97 pts.; p = 0.59). Univariate analysis for risk factors for therapy failure revealed age (p = 0.004), history of surgical abscess drainage (p = 0.04), BMI (p = 0.002), suprasphincteric fistula (p = 0.019) and horseshoe abscess (p = 0.036) as independent parameters for therapy failure. During multivariate analysis, only history of surgical abscess drainage (OR = 8.09, p = 0.048, 95% CI 0.98–64.96), suprasphincteric fistula (OR = 6.83, p = 0.032, 95% CI 1.17–6.83) and BMI (OR = 1.23, p = 0.017, 95% CI 1.03–1.46) were independent parameters for therapy failure.

Conclusion

Advancement flap for treatment of complex fistula is effective and has low risk of disturbed continence. BMI, suprasphincteric fistula and history of surgical abscess drainage are predictors for therapy failure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sainio P (1984) Fistula-in-ano in a defined population. Incidence and epidemiological aspects. Ann Chir Gynaecol 73(4):219–224

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cadeddu F, Salis F, Lisi G, Ciangola I, Milito G (2015) Complex anal fistula remains a challenge for colorectal surgeon. Int J Colorectal Dis 30(5):595–603

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Garcia-Aguilar J, Belmonte C, Wong WD, Goldberg SM, Madoff RD (1996) Anal fistula surgery. Factors associated with recurrence and incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 39(7):723–729

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kontovounisios C, Tekkis P, Tan E, Rasheed S, Darzi A, Wexner SD (2016) Adoption and success rates of perineal procedures for fistula-in-ano: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 18(5):441–458

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Buchanan GN, Bartram CI, Phillips RKS (2003) Efficacy of fibrin sealant in the management of complex anal fistula: a prospective trial. Dis Colon Rectum 46:1167–1174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Johnson EK, Gaw JU, Armstrong DN (2006) Efficacy of anal fistula plug versus fibrin glue in closure of anorectal fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 49(3):371–376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Damin DC, Rosito MA, Contu PC, Tarta C (2009) Fibrin glue in the management of complex anal fistula. Arq Gastroenterol 46(4):300–303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. de la Portilla F, Rada R, Jiménez-Rodríguez R, Díaz-Pavón JM, Sánchez-Gil JM (2011) Evaluation of a new synthetic plug in the treatment of anal fistulas: results of a pilot study. Dis Colon Rectum 54(11):1419–1422

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Perez F, Arroyo A, Serrano P, Sánchez A, Candela F, Perez MT, Calpena R (2006) Randomized clinical and manometric study of advancement flap versus fistulotomy with sphincter reconstruction in the management of complex fistula-in-ano. Am J Surg 192(1):34–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dudukgian H, Abcarian H (2011) Why do we have so much trouble treating anal fistula? World J Gastroenterol 17(28):3292–3296

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Ozuner G, Hull TL, Cartmill J, Fazio VW (1996) Long-term analysis of the use of transanal rectal advancement flaps for complicated anorectal/vaginal fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 39:10–14

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. van Onkelen RS, Gosselink MP, Thijsse S, Schouten WR (2014) Predictors of outcome after transanal advancement flap repair for high transsphincteric fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 57(8):1007–1011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schwandner O (2011) Obesity is a negative predictor of success after surgery for complex anal fistula. BMC Gastroenterol 23(11):61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ellis CN, Clark S (2007) Effect of tobacco smoking on advancement flap repair of complex anal fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 50(4):459–463

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jorge JM, Wexner SD (1993) Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 36:77–97

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Jacob TJ, Perakath B, Keighley MR (2010) Surgical intervention for anorectal fistula. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 12(5):CD006319

    Google Scholar 

  18. Limura E, Giordano P (2015) Modern management of anal fistula. World J Gastroenterol 21(1):12–20

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. van der Hagen SJ, Baeten CG, Soeters PB, Beets-Tan RG, Russel MG, van Gemert WG (2005) Staged mucosal advancement flap for the treatment of complex anal fistulas: pretreatment with noncutting Setons and in case of recurrent multiple abscesses a diverting stoma. Colorectal Dis 7(5):513–518

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mitalas LE, van Wijk JJ, Gosselink MP, Doornebosch P, Zimmerman DDE, Schouten WR (2010) Seton drainage prior to transanal advancement flap repair: Useful or not? Int J Colorectal Dis 25(12):1499–1502

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Golub RW, Wise WE Jr, Kerner BA, Khanduja KS, Aguilar PS (1997) Endorectal mucosal advancement flap: the preferred method for complex cryptoglandular fistula-in-ano. J Gastrointest Surg 1(5):487–491

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Poon CM, Ng DC, Ho-Yin MC, Li RS, Leong HT (2008) Recurrence pattern of fistula-in-ano in a Chinese population. J Gastrointest Liver Dis 17(1):53–57

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jordán J, Roig JV, García-Armengol J, García-Granero E, Solana A, Lledó S (2010) Risk factors for recurrence and incontinence after anal fistula surgery. Colorectal Dis 12(3):254–260

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Malik AI, Nelson RL, Tou S (2010) Incision and drainage of perianal abscess with or without treatment of anal fistula. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006827.pub2

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Helios University Hospital Wuppertal, University Witten-Herdecke, Heusnerstraße 40, 42283, Wuppertal, Germany

    Lars Boenicke, Hubert Zirngibl & Peter Ambe

  2. Centre of Coloproctology, Wuppertal, Germany

    Eduard Karsten

Authors
  1. Lars Boenicke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eduard Karsten
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hubert Zirngibl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Peter Ambe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lars Boenicke.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors confirm that there are no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Boenicke, L., Karsten, E., Zirngibl, H. et al. Advancement Flap for Treatment of Complex Cryptoglandular Anal Fistula: Prediction of Therapy Success or Failure Using Anamnestic and Clinical Parameters. World J Surg 41, 2395–2400 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4006-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4006-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation