Log in

Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Pulmonary Metastasectomy in Patients with Colorectal Cancer: A Recent 10-Year Single-Institution Experience

  • Original Scientific Report
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The purpose of this study was to identify independent unfavorable prognostic factors for patients who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for resection of pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer (CRC).

Methods

Between January 2004 and December 2013, 131 patients with pulmonary metastases from CRC underwent the aforementioned procedure for the first time at our institution. Kaplan–Meier survival curves and log-rank tests were used to analyze the survival rates. Multivariate analyses were performed using the Cox proportional hazards regression model.

Results

The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate of these 131 patients was 34 %. Multivariate analyses showed two variables to be independent significant unfavorable prognostic factors for DFS: preoperative high serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level and a greater number of pulmonary metastases. According to subgroup analyses that combined these two risk factors, the 5-year DFS rates were 58, 25, and 12 % for patients with 0, 1, or 2 risk factors, respectively.

Conclusion

In patients who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for pulmonary metastases from CRC, we identified two independent unfavorable prognostic factors for DFS: a high CEA level before metastasectomy and a greater number of pulmonary metastases. These factors can be used to identify higher- and lower-risk subgroups, which may help with selecting patients who would benefit the most from video-assisted thoracoscopic pulmonary metastasectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CRC:

Colorectal cancer

VATS:

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery

CT:

Computed tomography

CEA:

Carcinoembryonic antigen

FEV1:

Forced expiratory volume in 1 s

FVC:

Forced vital capacity

DFI:

Disease-free interval

DFS:

Disease-free survival

OS:

Overall survival

IRLM:

International Registry of Lung Metastases

References

  1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM et al (2011) Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61:69–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rena O, Casadio C, Viano F et al (2002) Pulmonary resection for metastases from colorectal cancer: factors influencing prognosis. Twenty-year experience. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 21:906–912

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Takakura Y, Miyata Y, Okajima M et al (2010) Short disease-free interval is a significant risk factor for intrapulmonary recurrence after resection of pulmonary metastases in colorectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 12:68–75

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lin BR, Chang TC, Lee YC et al (2009) Pulmonary resection for colorectal cancer metastases: duration between cancer onset and lung metastasis as an important prognostic factor. Ann Surg Oncol 16:1026–1032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Suzuki H, Kiyoshima M, Kitahara M et al (2015) Long-term outcomes after surgical resection of pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 99:435–440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zampino MG, Maisonneuve P, Ravenda PS et al (2014) Lung metastases from colorectal cancer: analysis of prognostic factors in a single institution study. Ann Thorac Surg 98:1238–1245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pfannschmidt J, Muley T, Dienemann H et al (2003) Prognostic factors and survival after complete resection of pulmonary metastases from colorectal carcinoma: experiences in 167 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 126:732–739

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Koga R, Yamamoto J, Saiura A et al (2006) Surgical resection of pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer: four favourable prognostic factors. Jpn J Clin Oncol 36:643–648

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Welter S, Jacobs J, Krbek T et al (2007) Prognostic impact of lymph node involvement in pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 31:167–172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cho S, Song IH, Yang HC et al (2013) Prognostic factors of pulmonary metastasis from colorectal carcinoma. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 17:303–307

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Oh SY, Kim DY, Suh KW (2015) Oncologic outcomes following metastasectomy in colorectal cancer patients develo** distant metastases after initial treatment. Ann Surg Treat Res 88:253–259

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Iizasa T, Suzuki M, Yoshida S et al (2006) Prediction of prognosis and surgical indications for pulmonary metastasectomy from colorectal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 82:254–260

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nakas A, Klimatsidas MN, Entwisle J et al (2009) Video-assisted versus open pulmonary metastasectomy: the surgeon’s finger or the radiologist’s eye? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 36:469–474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chao YK, Chang HC, Wu YC et al (2012) Management of lung metastases from colorectal cancer: video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus thoracotomy-a case-matched study. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 60:398–404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Landreneau RJ, De Giacomo T, Mack MJ et al (2000) Therapeutic video-assisted thoracoscopic surgical resection of colorectal pulmonary metastases. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 18:671–676

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Blumenthal RD, Hansen HJ, Goldenberg DM (2005) Inhibition of adhesion, invasion, and metastasis by antibodies targeting CEACAM6 (NCA-90) and CEACAM5 (Carcinoembryonic Antigen). Cancer Res 65:8809–8817

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. The International Registry of Lung Metastases (1997) Long-term results of lung metastasectomy: prognostic analyses based on 5206 cases. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 113:37–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryo Maeda.

Ethics declarations

Patient consent

No patient consent was required as the research is a retrospective chart review and no personally identifiable information was included in the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.

Additional information

All work included in the manuscript is performed at Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan. The research was approved by the Internal Review Board of the institution.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maeda, R., Suda, T., Hachimaru, A. et al. Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Pulmonary Metastasectomy in Patients with Colorectal Cancer: A Recent 10-Year Single-Institution Experience. World J Surg 40, 1318–1323 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3424-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3424-2

Keywords

Navigation