Log in

Indications for Staging Laparoscopy in Clinical T4M0 Gastric Cancer

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

This study was undertaken to determine the efficacy of the clinical indications for performing staging laparoscopy for locally advanced gastric cancer to detect peritoneal metastasis or positive cytology findings.

Methods

The study included 231 patients with T4 gastric cancer without hematogenous or clinically evident peritoneal metastasis. The clinicopathologic features, including T and N factors, were diagnosed by clinical staging. The relation between the clinicopathologic features and the presence of peritoneal metastasis or lavage cytology at surgery was analyzed.

Results

A total of 31 patients underwent staging laparoscopy; 200 others underwent open surgery as a primary treatment. Both peritoneal metastasis and lavage cytology were negative in 145 (62.8%) patients, whereas peritoneal metastasis or lavage cytology was positive in 86 patients (37.2%). When calculating diagnostic accuracy in the 23 patients who underwent open laparotomy after staging laparoscopy, the accuracy rate was 95.7%. A multivariate analysis showed that a tumor location involving three portions; macroscopic type 3, 4, or 5; and positive lymph node metastasis to all three is significantly correlated with either peritoneal metastasis or positive cytology. When patients had two or three factors among these three independent risk factors, peritoneal metastasis or positive cytology could be detected with 91.9% sensitivity and 46.7% positive predictive value.

Conclusions

The selection of T4 tumors based on clinically evaluable risk factors is therefore considered useful for detecting peritoneal metastasis efficiently and hence avoiding unnecessary staging laparoscopy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J et al (2005) Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 55:74–108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rohde H, Gebbensleben B, Bauer P et al (1989) Has there been any improvement in the staging of gastric cancer? Findings from the German Gastric Cancer TNM study group. Cancer 64:2465–2481

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Stell DA, Carter CR, Stewart I et al (1996) Prospective comparison of laparoscopy, ultrasonography and computed tomography in the staging of gastric cancer. Br J Surg 83:1260–1262

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Yano M, Tsu**aka T, Shiozaki H et al (2000) Appraisal of treatment strategy by staging laparoscopy for locally advanced gastric cancer. World J Surg 24:1130–1136. doi:10.1007/s002680010183

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nakagawa S, Nashimoto A, Ybusaki H (2007) Role of staging laparoscopy with peritoneal lavage cytology in the treatment of locally advanced gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 10:29–34

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lowy AM, Mansfield PE, Leach SD et al (1996) Laparoscopic staging for gastric cancer. Surgery 119:611–614

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ajani J, Bekaii-Saab T, D’Amico TA et al (2006) Gastric cancer clinical practice guidelines. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 4:350–366

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Roukos DH (2000) Current status and future perspectives in gastric cancer management. Cancer Treat Rev 26:243–255

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Inoue M, Tsugane S (2005) Epidemiology of gastric cancer in Japan. Postgrad Med J 81:419–424

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kurita N, Shimada M, Utsunomiya T et al (2010) Predictive factors of peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 24:980–983

    Google Scholar 

  11. Yoshikawa T, Kanari M, Tsuburaya A et al (2002) Clinical and diagnostic significance of abdominal CT for peritoneal metastases in patients with primary gastric cancer. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho 29:1925–1928

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Blackshaw GR, Barry JD, Edwards P et al (2003) Laparoscopy significantly improves the perceived preoperative stage of gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 6:225–229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Song KY, Kim JJ, Kim SN et al (2007) Staging laparoscopy for advanced gastric cancer: is it also useful for the group which has an aggressive surgical strategy? World J Surg 31:1228–1233. doi:10.1007/s00268-007-9017-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tanaka T, Kumagai K, Shimizu K et al (2000) Peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer with particular reference to lymphatic advancement; extranodal invasion is a significant risk factor for peritoneal metastasis. J Surg Oncol 75:165–171

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Fujimura T, Kinami S, Ninomiya I et al (2002) Diagnostic laparoscopy, serum CA125, and peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer. Endosopy 34:569–574

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kemer T, Ormen M, Kuralay F et al (2005) Diagnostic usefulness of carbohydrate antigen-125 in cancerous and noncancerous peritoneal effusions. Tohoku J Exp Med 205:11–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nakata B, Hirakawa YS, Chung K et al (1998) Serum CA 125 level as a predictor of peritoneal dissemination in patients with gastric carcinoma. Cancer 83:2488–2492

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bentrem D, Wilton A, Mazumdar M et al (2005) The value of peritoneal cytology as a preoperative predictor in patients with gastric carcinoma undergoing a curative resection. Ann Surg Oncol 12:347–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Majima T, Ichikura T, Mochizuki H (2002) Prognostic significance of the cytologic features of free cancer cells in the peritoneal cavity of patients with gastric cancer. Surg Today 32:35–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yoshikawa T, Tsuburaya A, Kobayashi O et al (2003) Peritoneal cytology in patients with gastric cancer exposed to the serosa: a proposed new classification based on the local and distant cytology. Hepatogastroenterology 50:1183–1186

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (1998) Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma—2nd English Edition. Gastric Cancer 1:10–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Habermann CR, Weiss F, Riecken R et al (2004) Preoperative staging of gastric adenocarcinoma: comparison of helical CT and endoscopic US. Radiology 230:465–471

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takaki Yoshikawa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tsuchida, K., Yoshikawa, T., Tsuburaya, A. et al. Indications for Staging Laparoscopy in Clinical T4M0 Gastric Cancer. World J Surg 35, 2703–2709 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-011-1290-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-011-1290-5

Keywords

Navigation