Abstract
Background
This study was undertaken to determine the efficacy of the clinical indications for performing staging laparoscopy for locally advanced gastric cancer to detect peritoneal metastasis or positive cytology findings.
Methods
The study included 231 patients with T4 gastric cancer without hematogenous or clinically evident peritoneal metastasis. The clinicopathologic features, including T and N factors, were diagnosed by clinical staging. The relation between the clinicopathologic features and the presence of peritoneal metastasis or lavage cytology at surgery was analyzed.
Results
A total of 31 patients underwent staging laparoscopy; 200 others underwent open surgery as a primary treatment. Both peritoneal metastasis and lavage cytology were negative in 145 (62.8%) patients, whereas peritoneal metastasis or lavage cytology was positive in 86 patients (37.2%). When calculating diagnostic accuracy in the 23 patients who underwent open laparotomy after staging laparoscopy, the accuracy rate was 95.7%. A multivariate analysis showed that a tumor location involving three portions; macroscopic type 3, 4, or 5; and positive lymph node metastasis to all three is significantly correlated with either peritoneal metastasis or positive cytology. When patients had two or three factors among these three independent risk factors, peritoneal metastasis or positive cytology could be detected with 91.9% sensitivity and 46.7% positive predictive value.
Conclusions
The selection of T4 tumors based on clinically evaluable risk factors is therefore considered useful for detecting peritoneal metastasis efficiently and hence avoiding unnecessary staging laparoscopy.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00268-011-1290-5/MediaObjects/268_2011_1290_Fig1_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00268-011-1290-5/MediaObjects/268_2011_1290_Fig2_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00268-011-1290-5/MediaObjects/268_2011_1290_Fig3_HTML.gif)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J et al (2005) Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 55:74–108
Rohde H, Gebbensleben B, Bauer P et al (1989) Has there been any improvement in the staging of gastric cancer? Findings from the German Gastric Cancer TNM study group. Cancer 64:2465–2481
Stell DA, Carter CR, Stewart I et al (1996) Prospective comparison of laparoscopy, ultrasonography and computed tomography in the staging of gastric cancer. Br J Surg 83:1260–1262
Yano M, Tsu**aka T, Shiozaki H et al (2000) Appraisal of treatment strategy by staging laparoscopy for locally advanced gastric cancer. World J Surg 24:1130–1136. doi:10.1007/s002680010183
Nakagawa S, Nashimoto A, Ybusaki H (2007) Role of staging laparoscopy with peritoneal lavage cytology in the treatment of locally advanced gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 10:29–34
Lowy AM, Mansfield PE, Leach SD et al (1996) Laparoscopic staging for gastric cancer. Surgery 119:611–614
Ajani J, Bekaii-Saab T, D’Amico TA et al (2006) Gastric cancer clinical practice guidelines. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 4:350–366
Roukos DH (2000) Current status and future perspectives in gastric cancer management. Cancer Treat Rev 26:243–255
Inoue M, Tsugane S (2005) Epidemiology of gastric cancer in Japan. Postgrad Med J 81:419–424
Kurita N, Shimada M, Utsunomiya T et al (2010) Predictive factors of peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 24:980–983
Yoshikawa T, Kanari M, Tsuburaya A et al (2002) Clinical and diagnostic significance of abdominal CT for peritoneal metastases in patients with primary gastric cancer. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho 29:1925–1928
Blackshaw GR, Barry JD, Edwards P et al (2003) Laparoscopy significantly improves the perceived preoperative stage of gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 6:225–229
Song KY, Kim JJ, Kim SN et al (2007) Staging laparoscopy for advanced gastric cancer: is it also useful for the group which has an aggressive surgical strategy? World J Surg 31:1228–1233. doi:10.1007/s00268-007-9017-3
Tanaka T, Kumagai K, Shimizu K et al (2000) Peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer with particular reference to lymphatic advancement; extranodal invasion is a significant risk factor for peritoneal metastasis. J Surg Oncol 75:165–171
Fujimura T, Kinami S, Ninomiya I et al (2002) Diagnostic laparoscopy, serum CA125, and peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer. Endosopy 34:569–574
Kemer T, Ormen M, Kuralay F et al (2005) Diagnostic usefulness of carbohydrate antigen-125 in cancerous and noncancerous peritoneal effusions. Tohoku J Exp Med 205:11–18
Nakata B, Hirakawa YS, Chung K et al (1998) Serum CA 125 level as a predictor of peritoneal dissemination in patients with gastric carcinoma. Cancer 83:2488–2492
Bentrem D, Wilton A, Mazumdar M et al (2005) The value of peritoneal cytology as a preoperative predictor in patients with gastric carcinoma undergoing a curative resection. Ann Surg Oncol 12:347–353
Majima T, Ichikura T, Mochizuki H (2002) Prognostic significance of the cytologic features of free cancer cells in the peritoneal cavity of patients with gastric cancer. Surg Today 32:35–39
Yoshikawa T, Tsuburaya A, Kobayashi O et al (2003) Peritoneal cytology in patients with gastric cancer exposed to the serosa: a proposed new classification based on the local and distant cytology. Hepatogastroenterology 50:1183–1186
Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (1998) Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma—2nd English Edition. Gastric Cancer 1:10–14
Habermann CR, Weiss F, Riecken R et al (2004) Preoperative staging of gastric adenocarcinoma: comparison of helical CT and endoscopic US. Radiology 230:465–471
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tsuchida, K., Yoshikawa, T., Tsuburaya, A. et al. Indications for Staging Laparoscopy in Clinical T4M0 Gastric Cancer. World J Surg 35, 2703–2709 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-011-1290-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-011-1290-5