Log in

Small Bowel Obstruction—Who Needs an Operation? A Multivariate Prediction Model

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Proper management of small bowel obstruction (SBO) requires a methodology to prevent nontherapeutic laparotomy while minimizing the chance of overlooking strangulation obstruction causing intestinal ischemia. Our aim was to identify preoperative risk factors associated with strangulating SBO and to develop a model to predict the need for operative intervention in the presence of an SBO. Our hypothesis was that free intraperitoneal fluid on computed tomography (CT) is associated with the presence of bowel ischemia and need for exploration.

Methods

We reviewed 100 consecutive patients with SBO, all of whom had undergone CT that was reviewed by a radiologist blinded to outcome. The need for operative management was confirmed retrospectively by four surgeons based on operative findings and the patient’s clinical course.

Results

Patients were divided into two groups: group 1, who required operative management on retrospective review, and group 2 who did not. Four patients who were treated nonoperatively had ischemia or died of malignant SBO and were then included in group 1; two patients who had a nontherapeutic exploration were included in group 2. On univariate analysis, the need for exploration (n = 48) was associated (p < 0.05) with a history of malignancy (29% vs. 12%), vomiting (85% vs. 63%), and CT findings of either free intraperitoneal fluid (67% vs. 31%), mesenteric edema (67% vs. 37%), mesenteric vascular engorgement (85% vs. 67%), small bowel wall thickening (44% vs. 25%) or absence of the “small bowel feces sign” (so-called fecalization) (10% vs. 29%). Ischemia (n = 11) was associated (p < 0.05 each) with peritonitis (36% vs. 1%), free intraperitoneal fluid (82% vs. 44%), serum lactate concentration (2.7 ± 1.6 vs. 1.3 ± 0.6 mmol/l), mesenteric edema (91% vs. 46%), closed loop obstruction (27% vs. 2%), pneumatosis intestinalis (18% vs. 0%), and portal venous gas (18% vs. 0%). On multivariate analysis, free intraperitoneal fluid [odds ratio (OR) 3.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.5–9.9], mesenteric edema (OR 3.59, 95% CI 1.3–9.6), lack of the “small bowel feces sign” (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.05–0.68), and a history of vomiting (OR 4.67, 95% CI 1.5–14.4) were independent predictors of the need for operative exploration (p < 0.05 each). The combination of vomiting, no “small bowel feces sign,” free intraperitoneal fluid, and mesenteric edema had a sensitivity of 96%, and a positive predictive value of 90% (OR 16.4, 95% CI 3.6–75.4) for requiring exploration.

Conclusion

Clinical, laboratory, and radiographic factors should all be considered when making a decision about treatment of SBO. The four clinical features—intraperitoneal free fluid, mesenteric edema, lack of the “small bowel feces sign,” history of vomiting—are predictive of requiring operative intervention during the patient’s hospital stay and should be factored strongly into the decision-making algorithm for operative versus nonoperative treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mucha P (1987) Small intestinal obstruction. Surg Clin North Am 67:597–620

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bizer LS, Liebling RW, Delany HM et al (1981) Small bowel obstruction. Surgery 89:407–413

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Silen W, Hein MF, Goldman L (1962) Strangulation obstruction of the small intestine. Arch Surg 85:137–145

    Google Scholar 

  4. Laws HL, Aldrete JS (1976) Small bowel obstruction: a review of 465 cases. South Med J 69:733–734

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bickell NA, Federman AD, Aufses AH (2005) Influence of time on risk of bowel resection in complete small bowel obstruction. J Am Coll Surg 201:847–854

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fevang BT, Jensen D, Svanes K et al (2002) Early operation or conservative management of patients with small bowel obstruction? Eur J Surg 168:475–481

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Shrock TR (1988) Small intestine. In: Way LW (ed) Current surgical diagnosis and treatment. Appleton & Lange, Norwalk, CT, pp 561–585

    Google Scholar 

  8. Barnett WO, Petro AB, Williamson JW (1976) A current appraisal of problems with gangrenous bowel. Ann Surg 183:653–659

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sheedy SP, Earnest F IV, Fletcher JG et al (2006) CT of small-bowel ischemia associated with obstruction in emergency department patients: diagnostic performance evaluation. Radiology 241:729–736

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Catalano O (1997) The faeces sign: a CT finding in small-bowel obstruction. Radiologe 37:417–419

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mayo-Smith WW, Wittenberg J, Bennett GL et al (1995) The CT small bowel faeces sign: description and clinical significance. Clin Radiol 50:765–767

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sarr MG, Bulkley GB, Zuidema GD (1983) Preoperative recognition of intestinal strangulation. Am J Surg 145:176–182

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Balthazar EJ, Birnbaum BA, Megibow AJ et al (1992) Closed-loop and strangulating intestinal obstruction: CT signs. Radiology 185:769–775

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Maglinte DD, Gage SN, Harmon BH et al (1993) Obstruction of the small intestine: accuracy and role of CT in diagnosis. Radiology 188:61–64

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Frager D, Medwid SW, Baer JW et al (1994) CT of small-bowel obstruction: value in establishing the diagnosis and determining the degree and cause. AJR Am J Roentgenol 162:37–41

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Maglinte DDT, Howard TJ, Lillemoe KD et al (2008) Small-bowel obstruction: state-of-the-art imaging and its role in clinical management. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 6:130–139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chou CK, Mak CW, Tzeng WS et al (2004) CT of small bowel ischemia. Abdom Imaging 29:18–22

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Argov S, Itzkovitz D, Wiener F (1989) A new method for differentiating simple intra-abdominal from strangulated small-intestinal obstruction. Curr Surg 46:456–460

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. O’Daly BJ, Ridgway PF, Keenan N et al (2009) Detected peritoneal fluid in small bowel obstruction is associated with the need for surgical intervention. Can J Surg 52:201–206

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ha HK, Kim JS, Lee MS et al (1997) Differentiation of simple and strangulated small-bowel obstructions: usefulness of known CT criteria. Radiology 204:507–512

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Assalia A, Schein M, Kopelman D et al (1994) Therapeutic effect of oral Gastrografin in adhesive, partial small-bowel obstruction: a prospective randomized trial. Surgery 115:433–437

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Biondo S, Pares D, Mora L et al (2003) Randomized clinical study of Gastrografin® administration in patients with adhesive small bowel obstruction. Br J Surg 90:542–546

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang Y, Gao Y, Ma Q et al (2006) Randomised clinical trial investigating the effects of combined administration of octreotide and methylglucamine diatrizoate in the older persons with adhesive small bowel obstruction. Dig Liver Dis 38:188–194

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Chen SC, Chang KJ, Lee PH et al (1999) Oral urograffin in postoperative small bowel obstruction. World J Surg 23:1051–1054

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Chen SC, Lin FY, Lee PH et al (1998) Water-soluble contrast study predicts the need for early surgery in adhesive small bowel obstruction. Br J Surg 85:1692–1694

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Feigin E, Seror D, Szold A et al (1996) Water-soluble contrast material has no therapeutic effect on postoperative small bowel obstruction: results of a prospective randomized clinical trial. Am J Surg 171:227–229

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kumar P, Kaman L, Singh G et al (2009) Therapeutic role of oral water soluble iodinated contrast agent in postoperative small bowel obstruction. Singap Med J 50:360–364

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Fevang BT, Jensen D, Fevang J et al (2000) Upper gastrointestinal contrast study in the management of small bowel obstruction: a prospective randomised study. Eur J Surg 166:39–43

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Maglinte DDT, Balthazar EJ, Kelvin FM et al (1997) The role of radiology in the diagnosis of small bowel obstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 168:1171–1180

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Makita O, Ikushima I, Matsumoto N et al (1999) CT differentiation between necrotic and nonnecrotic small bowel in closed loop and strangulating obstruction. Abdom Imaging 24:120–124

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Jones K, Mangram AJ, Lebron RA et al (2007) Can a computed tomography scoring system predict the need for surgery in small-bowel obstruction? Am J Surg 194:780–784

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Rocha FG, Theman TA, Matros E et al (2009) Nonoperative management of patients with a diagnosis of high-grade small bowel obstruction by computed tomography. Arch Surg 144:1000–1005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin D. Zielinski.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zielinski, M.D., Eiken, P.W., Bannon, M.P. et al. Small Bowel Obstruction—Who Needs an Operation? A Multivariate Prediction Model. World J Surg 34, 910–919 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0479-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0479-3

Keywords

Navigation