Log in

Predictive Value of Procalcitonin for the Diagnosis of Bowel Strangulation

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Intestinal obstruction is responsible for 3% of admissions to hospital emergency surgical departments, but it is difficult to distinguish simple obstruction from strangulation. Simple criteria for this distinction are sought. In this experimental study, procalcitonin, a known marker of bacterial inflammation, was used to detect strangulation. The predictive value of procalcitonin for small bowel strangulation was evaluated. Thirty male New Zealand rabbits (mean weight: 3.0 kg) were divided into three groups. In the first (control) group, only laparatomy was performed. In the second group, simple obstruction was created by ligating a 10-cm distal ileum segment. In the third group, distal strangulation was created by ligating a 10-cm distal ileum segment with the mesentery. Blood (1 cc) was taken from the right auricular vein of each animal for measuring the procalcitonin level. In both the control group and the simple obstruction group the procalcitonin levels were normal. In the strangulation group, elevation of procalcitonin was detected after 30 minutes, and the elevation was statistically significant at 120th minute compared with the control and simple obstruction groups. In patients with small bowel obstruction, measurement of procalcitonin levels is easy to perform and can be used in the follow-up. A more extensive clinical study is needed to evaluate the accuracy of the test as a marker.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. G Miller J Boman I Shrier et al. (2000) ArticleTitleNatural history of patients with adhesive small bowel obstruction Br. J. Surg. 87 1240–1247

    Google Scholar 

  2. P Mucha (1987) ArticleTitleSmall intestinal obstruction Surg. Clin. North Am. 67 597–621

    Google Scholar 

  3. WG Chadle EE Garr JD Richardson (1988) ArticleTitleThe importance of small bowel obstruction Am. Surg. 54 565–569

    Google Scholar 

  4. D Menzies H Ellis (1990) ArticleTitleIntestinal obstruction from adhesions-how big is the problem? Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 72 60–63 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By%2BC2cngsVc%3D Occurrence Handle2301905

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. WO Richards LF Williams (1988) ArticleTitleObstruction of the large and small intestine Surg. Clin. North Am. 68 358–376

    Google Scholar 

  6. MG Sarr GD Bulkly GD Zuidema (1983) ArticleTitlePreoperative recognition of intestinal strangulation obstruction Am. J. Surg. 145 176–182

    Google Scholar 

  7. BF Helmkamp J Kimmel (1985) ArticleTitleConservative management of small bowel obstruction Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 152 677–679

    Google Scholar 

  8. PG Horgan TF Gorey et al. (1992) ArticleTitleOperative assessment of intestinal viability Surg. Clin. North Am. 72 143–155

    Google Scholar 

  9. LD May MM Beronson (1993) ArticleTitleValue of serum inorganic phosphate in the diagnosis of ischemic bowel disease Am. J. Surg. 146 266–268

    Google Scholar 

  10. S Acosta TK Nilson M Bjorck (2001) ArticleTitlePreliminary study of D-dimer as a possible marker of acute bowel ischaemia Br. J. Surg. 88 385–388

    Google Scholar 

  11. O Makita I Ikushirna N Matsurnoto et al. (1999) ArticleTitleCT differentiation between necrotic and nonnecrotic small bowel in closed loop and strangulating obstruction Abdom. Imaging 24 120–124

    Google Scholar 

  12. D Frager S Medwid J Baer et al. (1994) ArticleTitleCT of small bowel obstruction: value in establishing the diagnosis and determining the degree and cause Am. J. Roentgenol. 162 37–41

    Google Scholar 

  13. E Geuses I Vervloessem D Vanbeckevoort et al. (2001) ArticleTitleUltrasonography in the evaluation of acute abdomen: intestinal pathology Emerg. Radiol. 8 134–143

    Google Scholar 

  14. JJ Peck T Milleson J Phelan (1999) ArticleTitleThe role of computed tomography with contrast and small bowel follow-through in management of small bowel obstruction Am. J. Surg. 177 375–378

    Google Scholar 

  15. Y Ko J Lim D Lee et al. (1993) ArticleTitleSmall bowel obstruction: sonographic evaluation Radiology 188 649–653

    Google Scholar 

  16. CA Arciero GN Bender CD Shriver (2001) ArticleTitleUtility of computed tomographic enteroclysis for the general surgeon Curr. Surg. 58 205–208

    Google Scholar 

  17. CK Chou CW Mak MC Huang et al. (2000) ArticleTitleDifferentiation of obstructive from non-obstructive bowel dilatation on CT Eur. J. Radiol. 35 213–220

    Google Scholar 

  18. HK Ha SU Rha JH Kim et al. (2000) ArticleTitleCT diagnosis of strangulation in patients with small bowel obstruction: current status and future directions Emerg. Radiol. 7 47–55

    Google Scholar 

  19. O Makita I Ikushima N Matsumoto et al. (1999) ArticleTitleCT differentiation between necrotic and nonnecrotic small bowel in closed loop and strangulating obstruction Abdom. Imaging 24 120–124

    Google Scholar 

  20. M Meisner (2002) ArticleTitlePathobiochemistry and clinical use of procalcitonin Clin. Chim. Acta 323 17–29

    Google Scholar 

  21. L Thomas (1998) Clinical Laboratory Diagnostics: Use and Assessment of Clinical Results EditionNumber1 TH Books-Verl-Gez Frankfurt/Main 710–714

    Google Scholar 

  22. ED Carrol APJ Thomson CA Hart (2002) ArticleTitleProcalcitonin as a marker of sepsis Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 20 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  23. ES Nylen KT Whang RH Snider et al. (1998) ArticleTitleMortality is increased by procalcitonin and decreased by an antiserum reactive to procalcitonin in experimental sepsis Crit. Care Med. 26 1001–1006

    Google Scholar 

  24. B Rau G Steinbach K Baumgart et al. (2000) ArticleTitleThe clinical value of procalcitonin in the prediction of infected necrosis in the acute pancreatitis Intens. Care Med. 26 159–164

    Google Scholar 

  25. HB Reith U Mittelkotter ES Debus et al. (1998) ArticleTitleProcalcitonin in early detection of post operative complications Dig. Surg. 15 260–265

    Google Scholar 

  26. M Meisner K Tschailowsky A Hutzler et al. (1998) ArticleTitlePostoperative plasma concentrations of procalcitonin after different types of surgery Intens. Care Med. 24 680–684

    Google Scholar 

  27. G Monneret JM Labaune C Isaac et al. (1997) ArticleTitleProcalcitonin and C-reactive protein levels in neonetal infections Acta Pediatr. 86 209–212

    Google Scholar 

  28. C Chiesa C Pacifico G Macuso et al. (1998) ArticleTitleProcalcitonin in pediatrics: overview and challenge Infection 26 236–241

    Google Scholar 

  29. MD Smith Y Suputtamongkol W Chaowagul et al. (1995) ArticleTitleElevated serum procalcitonin levels in patients with melioidosis Clin. Infect. Dis. 20 641–645

    Google Scholar 

  30. D Cooper L Sharpless J Cornelisson et al. (2001) ArticleTitleComparison between procalcitonin, serum amyloid-A and C-reactive protein as markers of serious bacterial and fungal infections after solid organ transplantation Transplant. Proc. 33 1806–1810

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Refik Ayten M.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ayten, R., Dogru, O., Camci, C. et al. Predictive Value of Procalcitonin for the Diagnosis of Bowel Strangulation. World J. Surg. 29, 187–189 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-004-7488-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-004-7488-z

Keywords

Navigation