Abstract
The community-based forest management program has been successful in the conservation of forest cover in Nepal. We investigated forest cover change for the Mechinagar and Buddhashanti Landscape (MBL) area within the Jhapa district, Nepal, during 1990–2019 using Landsat images and GIS tools and valuated the major ecosystem services (ES) of Kalika Community-managed Forest (KCF) within the MBL landscape using the economic approach–market price method (revealed price). Land cover analysis of the MBL area indicated that over the study period, there were increases in urban/built-up areas, forest, and tea plantations, and declines in cultivated land, shrub, barren land, water body, and grassland areas. In particular, forest cover increased by 8.6% from 41.5 sq.km to 45.1 sq.km, due to the conversion of 3.9 sq.km cultivated land and 2.4 sq.km shrub into forest cover. KCF, the selected case study area for ES valuation, has been successful in providing noticeable economic benefits from provisioning and cultural services. Of the provisioning services, wood and timber make the largest contribution with an average revenue collection of Nepali Rupees (NRs) 3091.4 thousands followed by non-timber forest products (NRs 883.1 thousands) and firewood (NRs 524.3 thousands), respectively, while ecotourism-based income is also important (NRs 458.4 thousands) and is increasing in later years. As monitoring forest cover in a rapidly changing landscape and evaluating the ES of the community-managed forest cover are imperative for sustainable environmental planning and policy formulation, these research outputs are expected to be a significant benchmark for planners, policy makers, and future researchers.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acharya R, Maraseni T, Cockfield G (2019a) Global trend of forest ecosystem services valuation@ An analysis of publications. Ecosyst Serv 39:100979
Acharya RP, Maraseni T, Cockfield G (2020) Assessing the financial contribution and carbon emission pattern of provisioning ecosystem services in Siwalik forests in Nepal: Valuation from the perspectives of disaggregated users. Land Use Policy 95:104647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104647
Acharya RP, Maraseni TN, Cockfield G (2019b) Local users and other stakeholders’ perceptions of the identification and prioritization of ecosystem services in fragile mountains: a case study of chure region of Nepal forests 10:421
Adhikari S, Baral H, Sudhir Chitale V, Nitschke CR (2019) Perceived changes in ecosystem services in the Panchase Mountain ecological region, Nepal. Resources 8:4
Aerts R, Honnay O (2011) Forest restoration, biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. BMC Ecol 11:29. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6785-11-29
Agrawal A, Chhatre A, Hardin R (2008) Changing governance of the world’s forests. Science 320:1460–1462. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1155369
Ahammad R, Stacey N, Eddy IMS, Tomscha SA, Sunderland TCH (2019) Recent trends of forest cover change and ecosystem services in eastern upland region of Bangladesh. Sci Total Environ 647:379–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.406
Anderson JR, Hardy EE, Roach JT, Witmer RE (1976) A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data. https://doi.org/10.3133/pp964
Balthazar V, Vanacker V, Molina A, Lambin EF (2015) Impacts of forest cover change on ecosystem services in high Andean mountains. Ecol Indic 48:63–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.07.043
Baniya B, Tang Q, Pokhrel Y, Xu X (2019) Vegetation dynamics and ecosystem service values changes at national and provincial scales in Nepal from 2000 to 2017. Environ Dev 32:100464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2019.100464
Baral H, Keenan RJ, Sharma SK, Stork NE, Kasel S (2014) Economic evaluation of ecosystem goods and services under different landscape management scenarios. Land Use Policy 39:54–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.03.008
Baral N, Stern MJ, Hammett AL (2012) Develo** a scale for evaluating ecotourism by visitors: a study in the Annapurna Conservation Area, Nepal. J Sustain Tour 20:975–989. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2012.663379
Baral P, Wen Y, Urriola NN (2018) Forest cover changes and trajectories in a typical middle mountain watershed of Western Nepal Land 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/land7020072
Basnyat B (2020) Commodifying the community forestry: a case from scientific forestry practices in Western Hills of Nepal. J For Res 25:69–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/13416979.2020.1743406
BCF (2019) Bansbari Community Forest Ofice Auditor’s report. BCF, Mechinagar
Bhandari PKC, Bhusal P, Paudel G, Upadhyaya CP, Khanal Chhetri BB(2019) Importance of community forestry funds for rural development in Nepal. Resources 8:85
Bhatta LD, van Oort BEH, Stork NE, Baral H (2015) Ecosystem services and livelihoods in a changing climate: understanding local adaptations in the Upper Koshi, Nepal. Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv Manag 11:145–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2015.1027793
Bhusal NP (2009) Chitwan National Park: a prime destination of eco-tourism in Central Tarai Region, Nepal The Third Pole 5:70–75. https://doi.org/10.3126/ttp.v5i0.1956
Birch JC et al. (2014) What benefits do community forests provide, and to whom? A rapid assessment of ecosystem services from a Himalayan forest, Nepal. Ecosyst Serv 8:118–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.03.005
Blomley T (2013) Lessons learned from community forestry in Africa and their relevance for REDD+. USAID-supported Forest Carbon, Markets and Communities (FCMC) Program, Washington, FC
Blomley T, Pfliegner K, Isango J, Zahabu E, Ahrends A, Burgess N (2008) Seeing the wood for the trees: an assessment of the impact of participatory forest management on forest condition in Tanzania. Oryx 42:380–391. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605308071433
Boerema A, Schoelynck J, Bal K, Vrebos D, Jacobs S, Staes J, Meire P (2014) Economic valuation of ecosystem services, a case study for aquatic vegetation removal in the Nete catchment (Belgium). Ecosyst Serv 7:46–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.08.001
Brandt JS, Buckley RC (2018) A global systematic review of empirical evidence of ecotourism impacts on forests in biodiversity hotspots. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 32:112–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.04.004
Bruggeman D, Meyfroidt P, Lambin EF (2015) Production forests as a conservation tool: effectiveness of Cameroon’s land use zoning policy. Land Use Policy 42:151–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.07.012
Burivalova Z, Hua F, Koh LP, Garcia C, Putz F (2017) A critical comparison of conventional, certified, and community management of tropical forests for timber in terms of environmental, economic, and social variables. Conserv Lett 10:4–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12244
CBS (2011) National population and housing census, vol 1. Central Bureau of Statistics, Kathmandu
Congalton RG, Green K (2019) Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data: principles and practices. CRC Press. Boca Raton, FL
Dahal BK, AnupK C, Sapkota RP (2020) Environmental Impacts of Community-Based Home stay Ecotourism in Nepal. J Tour Hosp 11:60–80
Dalle SP, de Blois S, Caballero J, Johns T (2006) Integrating analyses of local land-use regulations, cultural perceptions and land-use/land cover data for assessing the success of community-based conservation. For Ecol Manag 222:370–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2005.10.052
de Groot R et al. (2012) Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units. Ecosyst Serv 1:50–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.005
Duguma LA et al. (2018) Community forestry frameworks in sub-Saharan Africa and the impact on sustainable development. Ecol Soc 23. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10514-230421
Dziba L et al. (2019) Chapter 4—Direct and indirect drivers of change in biodiversity and nature’s contributions to people. In IPBES (2018): The IPBES regional assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services for Africa. Archer, E., Dziba L, Mulongoy KJ, Maoela MA, Walters M (eds.) Secretariat of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, Bonn, Germany, p 207–296
Felipe-Lucia MR, Comín FA, Escalera-Reyes J (2015) A framework for the social valuation of ecosystem services. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0555-2
Fisher B, Turner RK, Morling P (2009) Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecol Econ 68:643–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.014
Fisher R, Hirsh P (2008) Poverty and agrarian-forest interactions in Thailand. Geogr Res 46:74–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-5871.2007.00493.x
GACF (2010) Enhancing locally controlled forestry voice of community forestry media program. http://www.g3forest.org/userfiles/file/G3/CaseStudies/GACFCasestudies/GACF%20Communication%20Project.pdf. Accessed 30 June 2020
Giam X (2017) Global biodiversity loss from tropical deforestation. Proc Natl Acad Sci 114:5775–5777. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1706264114
Hauck J, Winkler KJ, Priess JA (2015) Reviewing drivers of ecosystem change as input for environmental and ecosystem services modelling. Sustain Water Qual Ecol 5:9–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.swaqe.2015.01.003
Honey M (2008) Ecotourism and sustainable development: who owns paradise? Island Press. http://worldcat.org and http://site.ebrary.com/id/10508797
Jacobs S et al. (2018) The means determine the end—pursuing integrated valuation in practice. Ecosyst Serv 29:515–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.07.011
JEW (2019) Jamunkhadi ecotourism and wetland report, vol 36. JEW, Jhapa, Nepal
Joshi G, Negi GCS (2011) Quantification and valuation of forest ecosystem services in the western Himalayan region of India. Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv Manag 7:2–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2011.598134
KCF (2015) Kalika Community Forest Community Forest Operational Plan (2015-2025). KCF, Mechinagar, p 11–12
KCF (2020) Forest products and financial report. Kalika Community Forest, Mechinagar
Kunwar RM, Evans A, Mainali J, Ansari AS, Rimal B, Bussmann RW (2018) Change in forest and vegetation cover influencing distribution and uses of plants in the Kailash Sacred Landscape, Nepal. Environ Dev Sustain. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-018-0254-4
Lamichhane BR et al. (2019) Contribution of buffer zone programs to reduce human-wildlife impacts: the Case of the Chitwan National Park, Nepal. Hum Ecol 47:95–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-019-0054-y
Lhoest S, Dufrêne M, Vermeulen C, Oszwald J, Doucet J-L, Fayolle A (2019) Perceptions of ecosystem services provided by tropical forests to local populations in Cameroon. Ecosyst Serv 38:100956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100956
Lhoest S et al. (2020) Quantifying the use of forest ecosystem services by local populations in Southeastern Cameroon. Sustainability 12:2505
Lima IB, d’Hauteserre A-M (2011) Community capitals and ecotourism for enhancing Amazonian forest livelihoods. Anatolia 22:184–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/13032917.2011.597933
Lonn P, Mizoue N, Ota T, Kajisa T, Yoshida S (2018) Evaluating the Contribution of Community-based Ecotourism (CBET) to household income and livelihood changes: a case study of the Chambok CBET Program in Cambodia. Ecol Econ 151:62–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.04.036
Lonn P, Mizoue N, Ota T, Kajisa T, Yoshida S (2019) Using Forest Cover Maps and Local People’s Perceptions to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Community-based Ecotourism for Forest Conservation in Chambok (Cambodia) Environ Conserv 46:111–117. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892918000462
Mengist W, Soromessa T (2019) Assessment of forest ecosystem service research trends and methodological approaches at global level: a meta-analysis. Environ Syst Res 8:22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40068-019-0150-4
Niraula RR, Gilani H, Pokharel BK, Qamer FM (2013) Measuring impacts of community forestry program through repeat photography and satellite remote sensing in the Dolakha district of Nepal. J Environ Manag 126:20–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.04.006
Pandey B, Seto KC (2015) Urbanization and agricultural land loss in India: comparing satellite estimates with census data. J Environ Manag 148:53–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.05.014
Paudel NS (2013) Community forestry, ecosystem services and poverty alleviation: evidence from Nepal. A conference paper. Paper presented at the Fourteenth Biennial Conference of the International Association for the Study of the Commons, Fuji, Japan, June 3–7
Paudyal K, Baral H, Bhandari S, Bhandari A, Keenan R (2019) Spatial assessment of the impact of land use and land cover change on supply of ecosystem services in Phewa watershed, Nepal. Ecosyst Serv 36:100895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100895
Paudyal K, Baral H, Burkhard B, Bhandari SP, Keenan RJ (2015) Participatory assessment and map** of ecosystem services in a data-poor region: case study of community-managed forests in central Nepal. Ecosyst Serv 13:81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.01.007
Paudyal K, Baral H, Lowell K, Keenan R (2017) Ecosystem services from community-based forestry in Nepal: realising local and global benefits. 63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.01.046
Payne C (2016) Legal liability for environmental damage: the United Nations Compensation Commission and the 1990-1991 Gulf War. pp 71–760. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203109793-33
Peh KS-H et al. (2014) Benefits and costs of ecological restoration: rapid assessment of changing ecosystem service values at a U.K. wetland. Ecol Evol 4:3875–3886. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1248
Pokharel BK, Nurse M (2004) Forests and people’s livelihood: benefiting the poor from community forestry J Forest Livelihood 4(1):19–29
Polasky S, Nelson E, Pennington D, Johnson KA (2011) The impact of land-use change on ecosystem services, biodiversity and returns to landowners: a case study in the State of Minnesota. Environ Resour Econ 48:219–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-010-9407-0
Radwan TM, Blackburn GA, Whyatt JD, Atkinson PM (2019) Dramatic loss of agricultural land due to urban expansion threatens food security in the Nile Delta, Egypt. Remote Sens 11:332
Razzaque J (2017) Payments for ecosystem services in Sustainable Mangrove Forest Management in Bangladesh. Transnatl Environ Law 6:309–333. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102516000376
Rijal S, Rimal B, Sloan S (2018) Flood hazard map** of a rapidly urbanizing city in the foothills (Birendranagar, Surkhet) of Nepal. Land 7:60
Rijal S, Rimal B, Stork N, Sharma HP (2020) Quantifying the drivers of urban expansion in Nepal. Environ Monitor Assess 192:633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-08544-3
Rimal B et al. (2019) Effects of land use and land cover change on ecosystem services in the Koshi River Basin, Eastern Nepal. Ecosyst Serv 38:100963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100963
Rimal B, Zhang L, Keshtkar H, Haack B, Rijal S, Zhang P (2018a) Land use/land cover dynamics and modeling of urban land expansion by the integration of cellular automata and Markov chain. ISPRS Int J Geoinf 7:154. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi7040154
Rimal B, Zhang L, Keshtkar H, Wang N, Lin Y (2017) Monitoring and modeling of spatiotemporal urban expansion and land-use/land-cover change using integrated Markov chain cellular automata model. ISPRS Int J Geoinf 6:288
Rimal B, Zhang L, Stork N, Sloan S, Rijal S (2018b) Urban expansion occurred at the expense of agricultural lands in the Tarai Region of Nepal from 1989 to 2016. Sustainability 10:1341
Rwanga SS, Ndambuki JM (2017) Accuracy assessment of land use/land cover classification using remote sensing and GIS. Int J Geosci 8(4):12. https://doi.org/10.4236/ijg.2017.84033
Sharma B, Rasul G, Chettri N (2015) The economic value of wetland ecosystem services: evidence from Koshi Tappu Wildlife Reserve, Nepal. Ecosyst Serv 12:84–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.02.007
Sharma R et al. (2019) Impact of land cover change on ecosystem services in a tropical forested landscape. Resources 8:18
Sinutok S, Hill R, Kühl M, Doblin MA, Ralph PJ (2014) Ocean acidification and warming alter photosynthesis and calcification of the symbiont-bearing foraminifera Marginopora vertebralis. Mar Biol 161:2143–2154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-014-2494-7
Suwarno A, Hein L, Sumarga E (2016) Who benefits from ecosystem services? A case study for Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. Environ Manag 57:331–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0623-9
Tan M, Li X, **e H, Lu C (2005) Urban land expansion and arable land loss in China—a case study of Bei**g–Tian**–Hebei region. Land Use Policy 22:187–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.03.003
Thapa S, Wang L, Koirala A, Shrestha S, Bhattarai S, Aye WN (2020) Valuation of ecosystem services from an important wetland of Nepal: a study from Begnas Watershed System. Wetlands 40:1071–1083. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-020-01303-7
Tiwari S (2018) Ecotourism in protected areas of Nepal: an application of individual travel cost method research. J Agric For Sci 5:1–6
Turner KG et al. (2016) A review of methods, data, and models to assess changes in the value of ecosystem services from land degradation and restoration. Ecol Model 319:190–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.07.017
Wu G, **ao H, Zhao J, Shao G, Li J (2002) Forest ecosystem services of Changbai mountain in China. Sci China C Life Sci 45:21–32. https://doi.org/10.1360/02yc9003
**e G et al. (2010) Forest ecosystem services and their values in Bei**g Chin Geogr Sci 20:51–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-010-0051-y
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank technical groups, local people, and KCF executive committee members for their support during the field visit. This work was financially supported by the Graduate School of Prince of Songkla University, and the Faculty of Environmental Management, Prince of Songkla University. The authors thank Assoc. Prof. Dr. Seppo Karrila and the RDO (Research and Development Office), Prince of Songkla University for assistance with proofing English.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rijal, S., Techato, K., Gyawali, S. et al. Forest Cover Change and Ecosystem Services: A Case Study of Community Forest in Mechinagar and Buddhashanti Landscape (MBL), Nepal. Environmental Management 67, 963–973 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-021-01430-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-021-01430-9