Abstract
Life cycle assessment (LCA) has become a common methodology to analyze environmental impacts of forestry systems. Although LCA has been widely applied to forestry since the 90s, the LCAs are still often based on generic Life Cycle Inventory (LCI). With the purpose of improving LCA practices in the forestry sector, we developed a European Life Cycle Inventory of Forestry Operations (EFO-LCI) and analyzed the available information to check if within the European forestry sector national differences really exist. We classified the European forests on the basis of “Forest Units” (combinations of tree species and silvicultural practices). For each Forest Unit, we constructed the LCI of their forest management practices on the basis of a questionnaire filled out by national silvicultural experts. We analyzed the data reported to evaluate how they vary over Europe and how they affect LCA results and made freely available the inventory data collected for future use. The study shows important variability in rotation length, type of regeneration, amount and assortments of wood products harvested, and machinery used due to the differences in management practices. The existing variability on these activities sensibly affect LCA results of forestry practices and raw wood production. Although it is practically unfeasible to collect site-specific data for all the LCAs involving forest-based products, the use of less generic LCI data of forestry practice is desirable to improve the reliability of the studies. With the release of EFO-LCI we made a step toward the construction of regionalized LCI for the European forestry sector.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anonymous (2016) Tell us where the data is. Nat Clim Change 6(12):10491049. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3177
Baker M (2016) 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility. Nature 533(7604):452–454
Barbati A, Corona P, Marchetti M (2006) European forest types. Categories and types for sustainable forest management reporting and policy. Technical Report, European Environment Agency. https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/technical_report_2006_9
Barbati A, Marchetti M, Chirici G, Corona P (2014) European forest types and forest Europe SFM indicators: tools for monitoring progress on forest biodiversity conservation. For Ecol Manag 321:145–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.07.004
Berg S (1997) Some aspects of LCA in the analysis of forestry operations. J Clean Prod 5(3):211–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(97)00040-1
Bosner A, Poršinsky T, Stankić I (2012) Forestry and life cycle assessment, Andreja Bosner, Tomislav Poršinsky and Igor Stankić (2012). Forestry and Life Cycle Assessment, Global Perspectives on Sustainable Forest Management. InTech. https://doi.org/10.5772/32898
Bright RM, Cherubini F, Strmman AH (2012) Climate impacts of bioenergy: inclusion of carbon cycle and albedo dynamics in life cycle impact assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev 37:2–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2012.01.002
Cherubini F, Peters GP, Berntsen T, Strømman AH, Hertwich E (2011) CO2 emissions from biomass combustion for bioenergy: atmospheric decay and contribution to global warming. GCB Bioenergy 3(5):413–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01102.x
Colomb V, Amar SA, Mens CB, Gac A, Gaillard G, Koch P, Mousset J, Salou T, Tailleur A, Hays M (2015) Agribalyse, the French LCI database for agricultural products: high quality data for producers and environmental labelling. Oilseeds Fats Crops Lipids 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1051/ocl/20140047
Creative Commons (2016) Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
De Rosa M, Schmidt J, Brandão M, Pizzol M (2016) A flexible parametric model for a balanced account of forest carbon fluxes in LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1148-z
Downie A, Lau D, Cowie A, Munroe P (2014) Approaches to greenhouse gas accounting methods for biomass carbon. Biomass Bioenergy 60:18–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.11.009
EFI (ed) (1995) LCA—a challenge for forestry and forest products industry. European Forest Institute. http://www2.efi.int/portal/virtual_library/publications/proceedings/8/
EU (2009) Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC andâ2003/30/EC. Technical Report, European Union
EU FP7 project FORMIT (2016) website. available at: http://www.eu-formit.eu
Eurostat (2014) The EU in the world 2014—a statistical portrait. Technical Report, European Union. Brussels. https://doi.org/10.2785/48181
Eurostat (2015) In the EU27, almost half of renewable energy comes from wood & wood waste. Brussels. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/en/web/products-press-releases/-/5-29112012-AP
Finnveden G, Hauschild MZ, Ekvall T, Guinée J, Heijungs R, Hellweg S, Koehler A, Pennington D, Suh S (2009) Recent developments in life cycle assessment. J Environ Manag 91(1):1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.06.018
Forest Europe and UNECE and FAO (2015) State of Europe’s forests 2015. Status and trends in sustainable forest management in Europe. Technical Report, Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe. Zvolen. http://foresteurope.org/state-europes-forests-2015-report/#1476293409311-9ee66a45-b35d9acd-b805
Frischknecht R (2004) Transparency in LCA—a heretical request? Int J Life Cycle Assess 9(4):211–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978595
Frühwald A, Wegener G (1993) EnergiekreislaufHolz—ein Vorbild für die Zukunft. Holz Zent 119:1949–1951
Frühwald A, Scharai-Rad M, Hasch J, Wegener G, Zimmer B (1997) Erstellung von Ökobilanzen für die Forst- und Holzwirtschaft. Informationsdienst Holz, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Holzforschung, München
González-Garca S, Feijoo G, Widsten P, Kandelbauer A, Zikulnig-Rusch E, Moreira MT (2009) Environmental performance assessment of hardboard manufacture. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14(5):456–466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-009-0099-z
González-García S, Moreira MT, Dias AC, Mola-Yudego B (2014) Cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment of forest operations in Europe: environmental and energy profiles. J Clean Prod 66:188–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.067
Graedel TE, Allenby BR (2010) Industrial ecology. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
Helin T, Sokka L, Soimakallio S, **oud K, Pajula T (2013) Approaches for inclusion of forest carbon cycle in life cycle assessment a review. GCB Bioenergy 5(5):475–486. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12016
Hellweg S, Milà i Canals L (2014) Emerging approaches, challenges and opportunities in life cycle assessment. Science 344(6188):1109–1113. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1248361, http://science.sciencemag.org/content/344/6188/1109.full.pdf
IPCC (2013) Climate change 2013: The Physical Science Basis: Working Group I Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge. http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg1/
Johnson E (2009) Goodbye to carbon neutral: getting biomass footprints right. Environ Impact Assess Rev 29(3):165–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2008.11.002
Jungmeier G, Werner F, Jarnehammar A, Hohenthal C, Richter K (2002a) Allocation in LCA of wood-based products experiences of cost action E9 part I. Methodology. Int J Life Cycle Assess 7(5):290–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978890
Jungmeier G, Werner F, Jarnehammar A, Hohenthal C, Richter K (2002b) Allocation in LCA of wood-based products experiences of cost action E9part II. Examples. Int J Life Cycle Assess 7(6):369–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978686
Keenan RJ, Reams GA, Achard F, de Freitas JV, Grainger A, Lindquist E (2015) Dynamics of global forest area: results from the FAO global forest resources assessment 2015. For Ecol Manag 352:9–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2015.06.014
Klein D, Wolf C, Schulz C, Weber-Blaschke G (2015) 20 years of life cycle assessment (LCA) in the forestry sector: state of the art and a methodical proposal for the LCA of forest production. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20(4):556–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0847-1
Lewandowska A, Foltynowicz Z, Podlesny A (2004) Comparative LCA of industrial objects part 1: LCA data quality assurance-sensitivity analysis and pedigree matrix. Int J Life Cycle Assess 9(2):86–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978567
Lewandowska A, Wawrzynkiewicz Z, Noskowiak A, Foltynowicz Z (2008) Adaptation of ecoinvent database to polish conditions. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(4):319–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-008-0010-3
Lippke B, Oneil E, Harrison R, Skog K, Gustavsson L, Sathre R (2011) Life cycle impacts of forest management and wood utilization on carbon mitigation: knowns and unknowns. Carbon Manag 2(3):303–333. https://doi.org/10.4155/cmt.11.24
Martnez-Alonso C, Berdasco L (2015) Carbon footprint of sawn timber products of Castanea sativa mill. in the north of Spain. J Clean Prod 102:127–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.004
McNutt M, Lehnert K, Hanson B, Nosek BA, Ellison AM, King JL (2016) Liberating field science samples and data. Science 351(6277):1024–1026. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad7048, http://science.sciencemag.org/content/351/6277/1024.full.pdf
Michelsen O, Solli C, Strmman AH (2008) Environmental impact and added value in forestry operations in Norway. J Ind Ecol 12(1):69–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2008.00008.x
Neumann M, Moreno A, Thurnher C, Mues V, Hrknen S, Mura M, Bouriaud O, Lang M, Cardellini G, Thivolle-Cazat A, Bronisz K, Merganic J, Alberdi I, Astrup R, Mohren F, Zhao M, Hasenauer H (2016) Creating a regional modis satellite-driven net primary production dataset for european forests. Remote Sens 8(7):554. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8070554
Newell JP, Vos RO (2012) Accounting for forest carbon pool dynamics in product carbon footprints: challenges and opportunities. Environ Impact Assess Rev 37:23–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2012.03.005
Nosek BA, Alter G, Banks GC, Borsboom D, Bowman SD, Breckler SJ, Buck S, Chambers CD, Chin G, Christensen G, Contestabile M, Dafoe A, Eich E, Freese J, Glennerster R, Goroff D, Green DP, Hesse B, Humphreys M, Ishiyama J, Karlan D, Kraut A, Lupia A, Mabry P, Madon T, Malhotra N, Mayo-Wilson E, McNutt M, Miguel E, Paluck EL, Simonsohn U, Soderberg C, Spellman BA, Turitto J, VandenBos G, Vazire S, Wagenmakers EJ, Wilson R, Yarkoni T (2015) Promoting an open research culture. Science 348(6242):1422–1425. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab2374, http://science.sciencemag.org/content/348/6242/1422.full.pdf
Pauliuk S, Majeau-Bettez G, Mutel CL, Steubing B, Stadler K (2015) Lifting industrial ecology modeling to a new level of quality and transparency: a call for more transparent publications and a collaborative open source software framework. J Ind Ecol 19(6):937–949. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12316
PE International (2016) Gabi life cycle inventory databases. http://www.gabi-software.com/international/downloads/
Peng R (2015) The reproducibility crisis in science: a statistical counterattack. Significance 12(3):30–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-9713.2015.00827.x
Ram K (2013) Git can facilitate greater reproducibility and increased transparency in science. Source Code Biol Med 8(1):7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1751-0473-8-7
Sandin G, Peters G, Svanström M (2016) Life cycle assessment of forest products: challenges and solutions. Springer International Publishing. Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44027-9
Sathre R, O’Connor J (2008) A synthesis of research on wood products and greenhouse gas impacts. Technical Report No. TR-19, FPInnovations. Vancouver. https://www.canfor.com/docs/why-wood/tr19-complete-pub-web.pdf
Schulze ED, Krner C, Law BE, Haberl H, Luyssaert S (2012) Large-scale bioenergy from additional harvest of forest biomass is neither sustainable nor greenhouse gas neutral. GCB Bioenergy 4(6):611–616. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-1707.2012.01169.x
Schweinle J (2007) Wood & other renewable resources: a challenge for LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12(3):141. https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2007.04.326
Seidling W, Michel A (2016) Forest condition in Europe: 2016 technical report of ICP forests. BFW Austrian Research Centre for Forests BFW-Dokumentation 23/2016, Vienna
Shen H (2014) Interactive notebooks: sharing the code. Nature 515(7525):151–152. https://doi.org/10.1038/515151a
Vanbeveren SPP, Schweier J, Berhongaray G, Ceulemans R (2015) Operational short rotation woody crop plantations: manual or mechanised harvesting? Biomass Bioenergy 72(Supplement C):8–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.11.019
WCDE (1987) Our common future. Technical Report, United Nations. Washington
Weidema BP, Wesnaes M (1996) Data quality management for life cycle inventoriesan example of using data quality indicators. J Clean Prod 4(3):167–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(96)00043-1
Weidema BP, Bauer C, Hischier R, Mutel C, Nemecek T, Reinhard J, Vadenbo C, Wernet G (2013) Overview and methodology: data quality guideline for the ecoinvent database version 3. Technical Report, Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Zurich.
Werner F, Althaus HJ, Richter K, Scholz RW (2006) Post-consumer waste wood in attributive product LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12(3):160–172. https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2006.05.249
Werner F, Althaus HJ, Künniger T, Richter K, Jungbluth N (2007) Life cycle inventories of wood as fuel and construction material. Final report ecoinvent data v2.0 No. 9. Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Dübendorf, CH
Wernet G, Bauer C, Steubing B, Reinhard J, Moreno-Ruiz E, Weidema B (2016) The ecoinvent database version 3 (part i): overview and methodology. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21(9):1218–1230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1087-8
Wicherts J, Kievit R, Bakker M, Borsboom D (2012) Letting the daylight in: reviewing the reviewers and other ways to maximize transparency in science. Front Comput Neurosci 6:20. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2012.00020
Wiersum K (1995) 200 years of sustainability in forestry: lessons from history. Environ Manag 19(3):321–329. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02471975
Wiloso E, Heijungs R, Huppes G, Fang K (2016) Effect of biogenic carbon inventory on the life cycle assessment of bioenergy: challenges to the neutrality assumption. J Clean Prod 125:78–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.096
Zanchi G, Pena N, Bird N (2011) Is woody bioenergy carbon neutral? A comparative assessment of emissions from consumption of woody bioenergy and fossil fuel. GCB Bioenergy 4(6):761–772. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01149.x
Acknowledgements
This work was conducted as part of the collaborative project FORest management strategies to enhance the MITigation potential of European forests (FORMIT). The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union Seventh Framework Programme under grant agreement no. 311970. The Polish research was supported by funds for science in the years 2013/2016 allocated to an international co-financed project. We thank Mait Lang, Karol Bronisz, Alain Thivolle Cazat, Stanislav Lazarov, Branko Glavonjic, and Dumitru Galupa for their review and help with data collection. We thank the two anonymous reviewers for their suggestions and comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cardellini, G., Valada, T., Cornillier, C. et al. EFO-LCI: A New Life Cycle Inventory Database of Forestry Operations in Europe. Environmental Management 61, 1031–1047 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-018-1024-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-018-1024-7