Log in

Assessing Riparian Conservation Land Management Practice Impacts on Gully Erosion in Iowa

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Well-established perennial vegetation in riparian areas of agricultural lands can stabilize the end points of gullies and reduce their overall erosion. The objective of this study was to investigate the impacts of riparian land management on gully erosion. A field survey documented the number of gullies and cattle access points in riparian forest buffers, grass filters, annual row-cropped fields, pastures in which the cattle were fenced out of the stream, and continuously, rotationally and intensive rotationally grazed pastures in three regions of Iowa. Gully lengths, depths and severely eroding bank areas were measured. Gullies exhibited few significant differences among riparian management practices. The most significant differences were exhibited between conservation and agricultural management practices, an indication that conservation practices could reduce gully erosion. Changes in pasture management from continuous to rotational or intensive rotational grazing showed no reductions in gully erosion. It is important to recognize that more significant differences among riparian management practices were not exhibited because the conservation and alternative grazing practices had recently been established. As gully formation is more impacted by upland than riparian management, gully stabilization might require additional upland conservation practices. The existence of numerous cattle access points in pastures where cattle have full access to the stream also indicates that these could be substantial sources of sediment for streams. Finally, the gully banks were less important sediment contributors to streams than the streambanks. The severely eroding bank areas in streams were six times greater than those in the gullies in the monitored reaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Canada)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersen KL (2000) Historical alterations of surface hydrology in Iowa’s small agricultural watersheds. Thesis (M.S.), Iowa State University, Ames, p 105

  • Beeson CE, Doyle PF (1995) Comparison of bank erosion at vegetated and non-vegetated channel bends. Water Resources Bulletin 31:983–990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks KN, Ffolliott PF, Gregersen HM, DeBano LF (2003) Hydrology and the management of watersheds. Iowa State Press, Ames, p 574

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkhart MR, Oberle SL, Hewitt MJ, Picklus J (1994) A framework for regional agroecosystems characterization using the national resources inventory. Journal of Environmental Quality 23:866–874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaplot V, Giboire G, Marchand P, Valentin C (2005) Dynamic modeling for linear erosion initiation and development under climate and land-use changes in northern Laos. Catena 63:318–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clary WP, Kinney JW (2002) Streambank and vegetation response to simulated cattle grazing. Wetlands 22:139–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diebel MW, Maxted JT, Robertson DM, Han S, Vander Zanden MJ (2009) Landscape planning for agricultural nonpoint source pollution reduction III: assessing phosphorus and sediment reduction potential. Environmental Management 43:69–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez B, Banbury K, Marden M, Trustrum NA, Peacock DH, Hoskin PJ (2003) Gully erosion and sediment production, Te Weraroa Stream, New Zealand. Water Resources Research 39(7):ESG 3-1-ESG 3-7

  • Iowa State University GIS (Geographic Information Systems) Support and Research Facility (2004) Digital Orthophoto Quads. http://ortho.gis.iastate.edu/index.html. Accessed online 9 June 2009

  • Knight KW, Schultz RC, Mabry CM, Isenhart TM (2010) Natural riparian forest buffers with and without planted grass filters as buffers of concentrated flow from row crop fields. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 46(2):311–322

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nearing MA, Priski FF, O’Neal MR (2004) Expected climate change impacts on soil erosion rates: a review. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 59(1):43–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Piest RF, Bowie AJ (1974) Gully and stream bank erosion. In: Land-use: persuasion of regulation. Proceedings of the 29th annual meeting of the soil conservation society of America. Soil Conservation Society of America, Ankeny, pp 188–196

  • Poesen J, Vandekerckhove L, Nachtergaele J, Oostwoud Wijdenes D, Verstraeten G, van Wesemael B (2002) Gully erosion in dryland environment. In: Bull LJ, Kirkby MJ (eds) Dryland rivers: hydrology and geomorphology of semi-arid channels. Wiley, Chichester, pp 229–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Poesen J, Nachtergaele J, Verstraeten G, Valentin C (2003) Gully erosion and environmental change: Importance and research needs. Catena 50:91–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prior JC (1991) Landforms of Iowa. Iowa Department of Natural Resources. University of Iowa Press. Iowa, p 168

  • Rogovska NP, Cruse RM (2011) Climate Change Consequences for Agriculture in Iowa. In: Iowa Climate Change Impacts Committee (eds) climate change impacts on Iowa 2010. Report to the Governor and Iowa General Assembly. Des Moines, pp 14–18

  • SAS Institute (1999) SAS Release 8.1. SAS Institute, Cary

  • Schumm A (1999) Causes and control of channel incision. In: Darby SE, Simon A (eds) Incised rivers: processes, forms, engineering and management. Wiley, Chichester, pp 19–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon A, Darby S (1999) The nature and significance of incised river channels. In: Darby SE, Simon A (eds) Incised rivers: processes, forms, engineering and management. Wiley, Chichester, pp 1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon A, Rinaldi M (2000) Channel instability in the Loess area of the Midwestern United States. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 36(1):133–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon A, Rinaldi M, Hadish G (1996) Channel evolution in the loess area of the Midwestern United States. Proceedings of the sixth federal interagency sedimentation conference, Las Vegas. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, pp III86–III96

  • Soil Science Society of America (SSSA) (2001) Glossary of soil science terms. Available via soil science society of America. https://www.soils.org/publications/soils-glossary. Accessed online 5 Nov 2010

  • Soil Survey Geographic Database (SSURGO) (2004) Iowa cooperative survey. Available via Iowa State University geographic information systems support and research facility. http://icss.agron.iastate.edu/. Accessed online 30 Jan 2009

  • Stall JB (1985) Upland erosion and downstream sediment delivery. In: El-Swaify SA, Moldenhauer WC, Lo A (eds) Soil erosion and conservation. Soil Conservation Society of America, Ankeny, pp 200–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Strahler AN (1957) Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 38:913–920

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas JT, Iverson NR, Burkart MR, Kramer LA (2004) Long-term growth of a valley-bottom gully, western Iowa. Earth Surface Process and Landforms 29:995–1009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trimble SW (1999) Decreased rates of alluvial sediment storage in the Coon Creek Basin, Wisconsin, 1975–1993. Science 285:1244–1246

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trimble SW (2008) Man-induced soil erosion on the Southern Piedmont. Soil and Water Conservation Society, Ankeny, p 70

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA-FSA (United States Department of Agriculture—Farm Service Agency) (2008) Conservation Programs. http://www.fsa.usda.gov/FSA/webapp?area=home&subject=copr&topic=crp. Accessed online 14 March 2011

  • USDA-NRCS (United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resource Conservation Service) (1997a) Profitable Pastures. A guide to grass, grazing and good management. USDA-NRCS. Des Moines, p 20

  • USDA-NRCS (United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resource Conservation Service) (1997b) Riparian forest buffer. Conservation practice standard, Code 392. USDA-NRCS, Des Moines, p 4

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA-NRCS (United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resource Conservation Service), (1997) Grass filters. Conservation practice standard, Code 393. USDA-NRCS, Des Moines, p 3

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA-NRCS (United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resource Conservation Service) (1998) Erosion and sediment delivery. Field office technical guide notice no. IA-198. USDA-NRCS, Des Moines, p 15

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA-NRCS (United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resource Conservation Service) (1999) Grassed waterway. Conservation practice standard, Code 412. USDA-NRCS, Des Moines, p 4

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentin C, Poesen J, Li Y (2005) Gully erosion: impacts, factors and control. Catena 63:132–153

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Webb RH, Hereford R (2001) Floods and geomorphic change in the southwestern United States: a historical perspective. Proceedings of the seventh federal interagency sedimentation conference, March 25–29, Reno, pp IV30–IV37

  • Whitney GG (1994) From coastal wilderness to fruited plains: a history of environmental change in temperate North America, 1500 to Present. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 488

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaimes GN, Schultz RC, Isenhart TM (2006) Riparian land-uses and precipitation influences on stream bank erosion in Central Iowa. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 42:83–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaimes GN, Schultz RC, Isenhart TM (2008) Streambank soil and phosphorus losses under different riparian land-uses in Iowa. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 44:935–947

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This research has been funded in its majority by the Iowa Department of Natural Resources under the Federal Nonpoint Source Management Program (Section 319 of the Clean Water Act) and in part by the University of Missouri Center for Agroforestry under cooperative agreements AG-02100251 with the USDA-ARS Dale Bumpers Small Farms Research Center, Booneville, AR and C R 826704-01-0 with the US EPA. The results presented are the sole responsibility of the authors and may not represent the policies or positions of the funding organizations. Firstly, we would like to thank Leigh Ann Long for her editing and revisions of the manuscript. Her input significantly improved the manuscript. We would also like to thank J. Herring, K. Kult, J. Love, M. Tufeckioglu and N. Zaimes for collecting data in the field. Finally, we would like to thank all the landowners that permitted us to use their farms as monitoring sites. This project would not have been possible without their cooperation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George N. Zaimes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zaimes, G.N., Schultz, R.C. Assessing Riparian Conservation Land Management Practice Impacts on Gully Erosion in Iowa. Environmental Management 49, 1009–1021 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-012-9830-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-012-9830-9

Keywords

Navigation