Abstract
Introduction
The aim of this study was to measure patient satisfaction using the BREAST-Q reconstruction module in patients selected for lipofilling procedures after implant breast reconstructions.
Materials and Methods
Seventy patients who underwent breast reconstruction with or without delayed lipofilling were enrolled between 2011 and 2015, and they completed BREAST-Q surveys. We administered the questionnaire electronically 6 months and 1 year after surgery. We divided patients into two groups. In group A, we included patients (46) who underwent secondary lipofilling almost 1 year after implant-based breast reconstruction; in group B (24), patients who underwent implant-based breast reconstruction without any lipofilling procedure. Statistical analysis was performed using descriptive and summary statistics to identify a central tendency between the two groups.
Results
All patients answered the postoperative BREAST-Q reconstruction module. The mean age of the patients was 41 years. Eleven of the 70 patients underwent a bilateral mastectomy. The mean follow-up was 2.5 years. The average amount of fat graft injected was 110 cc. In group A, there were two patients who had a complication: 1 infection and 1 intraoperative implant rupture. The average number of lipofilling procedures was 2.2. After further analysis of the questionnaire, we observed that patients in group A obtained significantly better postoperative results than patients from group B (control) regarding the following items: the ability to wear more fitted clothing; the reconstructed breast softness; symmetry (breasts of equal size relative to the other); reconstructed breast look and touch; amount of implant rippling perceived by the patients; and psychosocial well-being and physical well-being: chest and upper body.
Conclusions
Our results are encouraging regarding the use of autologous fat grafting to improve cosmetic outcomes and to reduce postoperative pain after breast reconstruction. This is the first study that applied BREAST-Q to breast lipofilling to demonstrate better outcomes achieved by patients who underwent secondary lipostructures.
Level of Evidence III
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kling RE, Mehrara BJ, Pusic AL, Young VL, Hume KM, Crotty CA, Rubin JP (2013) Trends in autologous fat grafting to the breast: a national survey of the American society of plastic surgeons. Plast Reconstr Surg 132:35–46
Kanchwala SK, Glatt BS, Conant EF, Bucky LP (2009) Autologous fat grafting to the reconstructed breast: the management of acquired contour deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg 124:409–418
Cagli B, Barone M, Ippolito E, Cogliandro A, Silipigni S, Ramella S, Persichetti P (2016) Ten years experience with breast reconstruction after salvage mastectomy in previously irradiated patients: analysis of outcomes, satisfaction and well-being. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 20:4635–4641
Kronowitz SJ (2012) Current status of implant-based breast reconstruction in patients receiving postmastectomy radiation therapy. Plast Reconstr Surg 130:513–523
Salgarello M, Visconti G, Barone-Adesi L (2012) Fat grafting and breast reconstruction with implant: another option for irradiated breast cancer patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 129:317–329
Pusic AL, Klassen AF, Scott AM, Klok JA, Cordeiro PG, Cano SJ (2009) Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg 124:345–353
Coleman SR, Saboeiro AP (2007) Fat grafting to the breast revisited: safety and efficacy. Plast Reconstr Surg 119:775–785
ASPRS Ad-hoc committee on new procedures. Report on autologous fat transplantation, September 30, 1987
Kanchwala SK, Glatt BS, Conant EF, Bucky LP (2009) Autologous fat grafting to the reconstructed breast: the management of acquired contour deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg 124:409–418
de Blacam C, Momoh AO, Colakoglu S, Tobias AM, Lee BT (2001) Evaluation of clinical outcomes and aesthetic results after autologous fat grafting for contour deformities of the reconstructed breast. Plast Reconstr Surg 128:411e–418e
Delay E, Garson S, Tousson G, Sinna R (2009) Fat injection to the breast: technique, results, and indications based on 880 procedures over 10 years. Aesthet Surg J 29:360–376
Hammond DC, O’Connor EA, Scheer JR (2015) Total envelope fat grafting: a novel approach in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 135:691–694
Rigotti G, Marchi A, Galiè M, Baroni G, Benati D, Krampera M, Pasini A, Sbarbati A (2007) Clinical treatment of radiotherapy tissue damage by lipoaspirate transplant: a healing process mediated by adipose-derived adult stem cells. Plast Reconstr Surg 119:1409–1422
Panettiere P, Marchetti L, Accorsi D (2009) The serial free fat transfer in irradiated prosthetic breast reconstructions. Aesthetic Plast Surg 33:695–700
Pavy JJ, Denekamp J, Letschert J, Littbrand B, Mornex F, Bernier J, Gonzales-Gonzales D, Horiot JC, Bolla M, Bartelink H (1995) Late effects toxicity scoring: the SOMA scale. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 31:1043
Pavi JJ, Denekamp J, Letschert J et al (1995) LENT-SOMA scales for all anatomic sites. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 31:1043–1047
Cigna E, Ribuffo D, Sorvillo V, Atzeni M, Piperno A, Calò PG, Scuderi N (2012) Secondary lipofilling after breast reconstruction with implants. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 16:1729–1734
Caviggioli F, Maione L, Forcellini D, Klinger F, Klinger M (2011) Autologous fat graft in postmastectomy pain syndrome. Plast Reconstr Surg 128:349–352
Maione L, Vinci V, Caviggioli F, Klinger F, Banzatti B, Catania B, Lisa A, Klinger M (2014) Autologous fat graft in postmastectomy pain syndrome following breast conservative surgery and radiotherapy. Aesthet Plast Surg 38:528–532
Juhl AA, Karlsson P, Damsgaard TE (2016) Fat grafting for alleviating persistent pain after breast cancer treatment: a randomized controlled trial. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 69:1192–1202
Kristiansen K, Lyngholm-Kjaerby P, Moe C (2010) Introduction and validation of DoloTest((R)): a new health-related quality of life tool used in pain patients. Pain Pract 10:396–403
Bouhassira D, Attal N, Fermanian J, Alchaar H, Gautron M, Masquelier E, Rostaing S, Lanteri-Minet M, Collin E, Grisart J, Boureau F (2004) Development and validation of the neuropathic pain symptom inventory. Pain 108:248–257
van de Kar AL, Corion LU, Smeulders MJ, Draaijers LJ, van der Horst CM, van Zuijlen PP (2005) Reliable and feasible evaluation of linear scars by the patient and observer scar assessment scale. Plast Reconstr Surg 116:514–522
Salgarello M, Visconti G, Barone-Adesi L (2012) Fat grafting and breast reconstruction with implant: another option for irradiated breast cancer patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 129:317–329
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Annalisa Cogliandro, Mauro Barone, Stefania Tenna, Marco Morelli Coppola and Paolo Persichetti declares that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Standards
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cogliandro, A., Barone, M., Tenna, S. et al. The Role of Lipofilling After Breast Reconstruction: Evaluation of Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction with BREAST-Q. Aesth Plast Surg 41, 1325–1331 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-0912-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-0912-1