Log in

Meta-analysis suggests that reverse shoulder arthroplasty in proximal humerus fractures is a better option than hemiarthroplasty in the elderly

  • Review Article
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This systematic meta-analysis and review aims to critically compare the outcome of reverse shoulder arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of complex proximal humeral fracture.

Methods

Relevant original studies were searched in the electronic databases of Medline, Embase, Cochrane central database and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) (all through December 2014). Studies that investigated and compared the effectiveness or complications in both groups and provided sufficient data of interest were included in this meta-analysis. Participants in both groups were significantly the same in the demography and injury mechanism.

Results

Eight studies that fulfilled inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in this meta-analysis, which included 421 participants in hemiarthroplasty (HA) and 160 in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). Patients were followed-up for at least one year in each study. Compared with HA, RSA was associated with a lower rate of total complications, higher American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, more healed tuberosities and improved active forward elevation. Both treatments were comparable in term of revision surgeries, mortality, subjective satisfaction and active external rotation.

Conclusions

The present evidence from this meta-analysis suggested that RSA was a more advantaged method for the treatment of complex proximal humeral fractures. Clinical decision should be preferred to RSA on the condition that patients’ medical conditions are indicated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thanasas C, Kontakis G, Angoules A, Limb D, Giannoudis P (2009) Treatment of proximal humerus fractures with locking plates: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 18:837–844

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang YZ (2012) Clinical epidemiology of orthopedic trauma.1st edn. Thieme, Stuttgart New York, pp 11–49

  3. Min W, Davidovitch RI, Tejwani NC (2012) Three-and four-part proximal humerus fractures: evolution to operative care. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 70:25–34

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Young SW, Segal BS, Turner PC, Poon PC (2010) Comparison of functional outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty in the primary treatment of acute proximal humerus fracture. J Surg 80:789–793

    Google Scholar 

  5. Owsley KC, Gorczyca JT (2008) Fracture displacement and screw cutout after open reduction and locked plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90:233–240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Solberg BD, Moon CN, Franco DP, Paiement G (2009) Surgical treatment of three and four-part proximal humeral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:1689–1697

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Spross C, Platz A, Erschbamer M, Lattmann T, Dietrich M (2012) Surgical treatment of Neer Group VI proximal humeral fractures: retrospective comparison of PHILOS(R) and hemiarthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:2035–2042

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jones KJ, Dines DM, Gulotta L, Dines JS (2013) Management of proximal humerus fractures utilizing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 6:63–70

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Boileau P, Krishnan SG, Tinsi L, Walch G, Coste JS et al (2002) Tuberosity malposition and migration: reasons for poor outcomes after hemiarthroplasty for displaced fractures of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11:401–412

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Robinson CM, Page RS, Hill RM, Sanders DL, Court-Brown CM (2003) Primary hemiarthroplasty for treatment of proximal humeral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85:1215–1223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Shah N, Iqbal HJ, Brookes-Fazakerley S, Sinopidis C (2011) Shoulder hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of three and four part fractures of the proximal humerus using Comprehensive® Fracture stem. Int Orthop 35:861–867

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Garrigues GE, Johnston PS, Pepe MD, Tucker BS, Ramsey ML (2012) Hemiarthroplasty versus reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for acute proximal humerus fractures in elderly patients. Orthopedics 35:e703–e708

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Boyle MJ, Youn SM, Frampton CM, Ball CM (2013) Functional outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty compared with hemiarthroplasty for acute proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 22:32–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cuff DJ, Pupello DR (2013) Comparison of hemiarthroplasty and reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95:2050–2055

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Namdari S, Horneff JG, Baldwin K (2013) Comparison of hemiarthroplasty and reverse arthroplasty for treatment of proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95:1701–1708

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mansat P, Bonnevialle N (2015) Treatment of fracture sequelae of the proximal humerus: anatomical vs reverse shoulder prosthesis. Int Orthop 39:349–354

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cicak N, Klobucar H, Medancic N (2015) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty in acute fractures provides better results than in revision procedures for fracture sequelae. Int Orthop 39:343–348

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Scarlat MM (2013) Complications with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty and recent evolutions. Int Orthop 37:843–851

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fang X, Jiang L, Wang Y, Zhao L (2012) Treatment of Gustilo grade III tibial fractures with unreamed intramedullary nailing versus external fixator: a meta-analysis. Med Sci Monit 18:Ra49–Ra56

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lau JIJ, Schmid CH (1997) Quantitative synthesis in systematic reviews. Ann Intern Med 127:820–826

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wei J, Yang TB, Luo W, Qin JB, Kong FJ (2013) Complications following dorsal versus volar plate fixation of distal radius fracture: a meta-analysis. J Int Med Res 41:265–275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gallinet D, Clappaz P, Garbuio P, Tropet Y, Obert L (2009) Three or four parts complex proximal humerus fractures: hemiarthroplasty versus reverse prosthesis: a comparative study of 40 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 95:48–55

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Cd F (2013) Hemiarthroplasty versus total shoulder arthroplasty for acute proximal humerus fractures in elderly patients: a mid-term follow up study. HaiNan Med J 24:1910–1913

    Google Scholar 

  24. Baudi P, Campochiaro G, Serafini F, Gazzotti G, Matino G, Rovesta C, Catani F (2014) Hemiarthroplasty versus reverse shoulder arthroplasty: comparative study of functional and radiological outcomes in the treatment of acute proximal humerus fracture. Musculoskelet Surg 98:S19–S25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Chalmers PN, Slikker W, Mall NA, Gupta AK, Rahman Z, Nicholson GP (2014) Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for acute proximal humeral fracture: comparison to open reduction-internal fixation and hemiarthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 23:197–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hessmann M, Baumgaertel F, Gehling H, Klingelhoeffer I, Gotzen L (1999) Plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures with indirect reduction: surgical technique and results utilizing three shoulder scores. Injury 30:453–462

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Adedapo AO, Ikpeme JO (2001) The results of internal fixation of three- and four-part proximal humeral fractures with the Polarus nail. Injury 32:115–121

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Solberg BD, Moon CN, Franco DP, Paiement GD (2009) Locked plating of 3- and 4-part proximal humerus fractures in older patients: the effect of initial fracture pattern on outcome. J Orthop Trauma 23:113–1119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Cheung E, Willis M, Walker M, Clark R, Frankle MA (2011) Complications in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 19:439–449

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Clark JC, Ritchie J, Song FS, Kissenberth MJ, Tolan SJ, Hart ND, Hawkins RJ (2012) Complication rates, dislocation, pain, and postoperative range of motion after reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients with and without repair of the subscapularis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21:36–41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Cuff D, Pupello D, Virani N, Levy J, Frankle M (2008) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of rotator cuff deficiency. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90:1244–1251

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Levy J, Frankle M, Mighell M, Pupello D (2007) The use of the reverse shoulder prosthesis for the treatment of failed hemiarthroplasty for proximal humeral fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:292–300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Antuna SA, Sperling JW, Cofield RH (2008) Shoulder hemiarthroplasty for acute fractures of the proximal humerus: a minimum five-year follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 17:202–209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Besch L, Daniels-Wredenhagen M, Mueller M, Varoga D, Hilgert RE, Seekamp A (2009) Hemiarthroplasty of the shoulder after four-part fracture of the humeral head: a long-term analysis of 34 cases. J Trauma 66:211–214

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Mighell MA, Kolm GP, Collinge CA, Frankle MA (2003) Outcomes of hemiarthroplasty for fractures of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 12:569–577

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Reuther F, Muhlhausler B, Wahl D, Nijs S (2010) Functional outcome of shoulder hemiarthroplasty for fractures: a multicentre analysis. Injury 41:606–612

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to G. Xu and B. Liu of the Department of Orthopedics, to X. Zhang and Q. Zhang of the Department of Statistics and applications and Lei Fu of the Drawings Department for their kind assistance.

Yingze Zhang designed the study; Yanbin Zhu and Fei Zhang searched relevant studies and abstracted the data; Wei Chen and Ye Tian analyzed and interpreted the data; Juan Wang and Yanbin Zhu wrote the manuscript and Yingze Zhang approved the final version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of interest

All the authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest. No organization sponsored the research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yingze Zhang.

Additional information

Juan Wang and Yanbin Zhu contributed equally to this work

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOCX 15 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, J., Zhu, Y., Zhang, F. et al. Meta-analysis suggests that reverse shoulder arthroplasty in proximal humerus fractures is a better option than hemiarthroplasty in the elderly. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 40, 531–539 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2811-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2811-x

Keywords

Navigation