Log in

How to define pathologic pelvic floor descent in MR defecography during defecation?

  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To assess the extents of pelvic floor descent both during the maximal straining phase and the defecation phase in healthy volunteers and in patients with pelvic floor disorders, studied with MR defecography (MRD), and to define specific threshold values for pelvic floor descent during the defecation phase.

Material and methods

Twenty-two patients (mean age 51 ± 19.4) with obstructed defecation and 20 healthy volunteers (mean age 33.4 ± 11.5) underwent 3.0T MRD in supine position using midsagittal T2-weighted images. Two radiologists performed measurements in reference to PCL-lines in straining and during defecation. In order to identify cutoff values of pelvic floor measurements for diagnosis of pathologic pelvic floor descent [anterior, middle, and posterior compartments (AC, MC, PC)], receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted.

Results

Pelvic floor descent of all three compartments was significantly larger during defecation than at straining in patients and healthy volunteers (p < 0.002). When grading pelvic floor descent in the straining phase, only two healthy volunteers showed moderate PC descent (10%), which is considered pathologic. However, when applying the grading system during defecation, PC descent was overestimated with 50% of the healthy volunteers (10 of 20) showing moderate PC descent. The AUC for PC measurements during defecation was 0.77 (p = 0.003) and suggests a cutoff value of 45 mm below the PCL to identify patients with pathologic PC descent. With the adapted cutoff, only 15% of healthy volunteers show pathologic PC descent during defecation.

Conclusion

MRD measurements during straining and defecation can be used to differentiate patients with pelvic floor dysfunction from healthy volunteers. However, different cutoff values should be used during straining and during defecation to define normal or pathologic PC descent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bitti GT, Argiolas GM, Ballicu N, et al. (2014) Pelvic floor failure: MR imaging evaluation of anatomic and functional abnormalities. Radiographics 34(2):429–448. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.342125050

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mortele KJ, Fairhurst J (2007) Dynamic MR defecography of the posterior compartment: Indications, techniques and MRI features. Eur J Radiol 61(3):462–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.11.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Palsson OS, Whitehead WE, van Tilburg MA, et al. (2016) Rome IV diagnostic questionnaires and tables for investigators and clinicians. Gastroenterology . https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rao SS, Bharucha AE, Chiarioni G, et al. (2016) Functional anorectal disorders. Gastroenterology . https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.009

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Longstreth GF, Thompson WG, Chey WD, et al. (2006) Functional bowel disorders. Gastroenterology 130(5):1480–1491. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2005.11.061

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Al-Najar MS, Ghanem AF, AlRyalat SAS, Al-Ryalat NT, Alhajahjeh SO (2017) The usefulness of MR defecography in the evaluation of pelvic floor dysfunction: our experience using 3T MRI. Abdom Radiol (NY) 42(9):2219–2224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1130-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Podzemny V, Pescatori LC, Pescatori M (2015) Management of obstructed defecation. World J Gastroenterol 21(4):1053–1060. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i4.1053

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Bertschinger KM, Hetzer FH, Roos JE, et al. (2002) Dynamic MR imaging of the pelvic floor performed with patient sitting in an open-magnet unit versus with patient supine in a closed-magnet unit. Radiology 223(2):501–508. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2232010665

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Vanbeckevoort D, Van Hoe L, Oyen R, et al. (1999) Pelvic floor descent in females: comparative study of colpocystodefecography and dynamic fast MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 9(3):373–377

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Healy JC, Halligan S, Reznek RH, et al. (1997) Dynamic MR imaging compared with evacuation proctography when evaluating anorectal configuration and pelvic floor movement. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169(3):775–779. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.169.3.9275895

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schoenenberger AW, Debatin JF, Guldenschuh I, et al. (1998) Dynamic MR defecography with a superconducting, open-configuration MR system. Radiology 206(3):641–646. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.206.3.9494480

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Flusberg M, Sahni VA, Erturk SM, Mortele KJ (2011) Dynamic MR defecography: assessment of the usefulness of the defecation phase. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196(4):W394–W399. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.10.4445

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bhan SN, Mnatzakanian GN, Nisenbaum R, Lee AB, Colak E (2016) MRI for pelvic floor dysfunction: can the strain phase be eliminated? Abdom Radiol (NY) 41(2):215–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0577-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. El Sayed RF, Alt CD, Maccioni F, et al. (2016) Magnetic resonance imaging of pelvic floor dysfunction—joint recommendations of the ESUR and ESGAR Pelvic Floor Working Group. Eur Radiol . https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4471-7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Agachan F, Chen T, Pfeifer J, Reissman P, Wexner SD (1996) A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients. Dis Colon Rectum 39(6):681–685

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Jorge JM, Wexner SD (1993) Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 36(1):77–97

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gupta MK, Khatri G, Bailey A, et al. (2016) Endoluminal contrast for abdomen and pelvis magnetic resonance imaging. Abdom Radiol (NY) 41(7):1378–1398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-0668-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. El Sayed RF, El Mashed S, Farag A, Morsy MM, Abdel Azim MS (2008) Pelvic floor dysfunction: assessment with combined analysis of static and dynamic MR imaging findings. Radiology 248(2):518–530. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2482070974

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Maglinte DD, Kelvin FM, Hale DS, Benson JT (1997) Dynamic cystoproctography: a unifying diagnostic approach to pelvic floor and anorectal dysfunction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169(3):759–767. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.169.3.9275893

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cicchetti DV (1994) Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol Assess 6:284–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Goh V, Halligan S, Kaplan G, Healy JC, Bartram CI (2000) Dynamic MR imaging of the pelvic floor in asymptomatic subjects. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174(3):661–666. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.174.3.1740661

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Schreyer AG, Paetzel C, Furst A, et al. (2012) Dynamic magnetic resonance defecography in 10 asymptomatic volunteers. World J Gastroenterol 18(46):6836–6842. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i46.6836

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Rosenkrantz AB, Lewis MT, Yalamanchili S, et al. (2014) Prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse detected at dynamic MRI in women without history of pelvic floor dysfunction: comparison of two reference lines. Clin Radiol 69(2):e71–e77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2013.09.015

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. El Sayed RF, Alt CD, Maccioni F, et al. (2017) Magnetic resonance imaging of pelvic floor dysfunction—joint recommendations of the ESUR and ESGAR Pelvic Floor Working Group. Eur Radiol 27(5):2067–2085. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4471-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caecilia S. Reiner.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This study was not funded.

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schawkat, K., Heinrich, H., Parker, H.L. et al. How to define pathologic pelvic floor descent in MR defecography during defecation?. Abdom Radiol 43, 3233–3240 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1652-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1652-7

Keywords

Navigation