Abstract
Objectives
To assess the extents of pelvic floor descent both during the maximal straining phase and the defecation phase in healthy volunteers and in patients with pelvic floor disorders, studied with MR defecography (MRD), and to define specific threshold values for pelvic floor descent during the defecation phase.
Material and methods
Twenty-two patients (mean age 51 ± 19.4) with obstructed defecation and 20 healthy volunteers (mean age 33.4 ± 11.5) underwent 3.0T MRD in supine position using midsagittal T2-weighted images. Two radiologists performed measurements in reference to PCL-lines in straining and during defecation. In order to identify cutoff values of pelvic floor measurements for diagnosis of pathologic pelvic floor descent [anterior, middle, and posterior compartments (AC, MC, PC)], receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted.
Results
Pelvic floor descent of all three compartments was significantly larger during defecation than at straining in patients and healthy volunteers (p < 0.002). When grading pelvic floor descent in the straining phase, only two healthy volunteers showed moderate PC descent (10%), which is considered pathologic. However, when applying the grading system during defecation, PC descent was overestimated with 50% of the healthy volunteers (10 of 20) showing moderate PC descent. The AUC for PC measurements during defecation was 0.77 (p = 0.003) and suggests a cutoff value of 45 mm below the PCL to identify patients with pathologic PC descent. With the adapted cutoff, only 15% of healthy volunteers show pathologic PC descent during defecation.
Conclusion
MRD measurements during straining and defecation can be used to differentiate patients with pelvic floor dysfunction from healthy volunteers. However, different cutoff values should be used during straining and during defecation to define normal or pathologic PC descent.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00261-018-1652-7/MediaObjects/261_2018_1652_Fig1_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00261-018-1652-7/MediaObjects/261_2018_1652_Fig2_HTML.jpg)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bitti GT, Argiolas GM, Ballicu N, et al. (2014) Pelvic floor failure: MR imaging evaluation of anatomic and functional abnormalities. Radiographics 34(2):429–448. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.342125050
Mortele KJ, Fairhurst J (2007) Dynamic MR defecography of the posterior compartment: Indications, techniques and MRI features. Eur J Radiol 61(3):462–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.11.020
Palsson OS, Whitehead WE, van Tilburg MA, et al. (2016) Rome IV diagnostic questionnaires and tables for investigators and clinicians. Gastroenterology . https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.014
Rao SS, Bharucha AE, Chiarioni G, et al. (2016) Functional anorectal disorders. Gastroenterology . https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.009
Longstreth GF, Thompson WG, Chey WD, et al. (2006) Functional bowel disorders. Gastroenterology 130(5):1480–1491. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2005.11.061
Al-Najar MS, Ghanem AF, AlRyalat SAS, Al-Ryalat NT, Alhajahjeh SO (2017) The usefulness of MR defecography in the evaluation of pelvic floor dysfunction: our experience using 3T MRI. Abdom Radiol (NY) 42(9):2219–2224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1130-7
Podzemny V, Pescatori LC, Pescatori M (2015) Management of obstructed defecation. World J Gastroenterol 21(4):1053–1060. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i4.1053
Bertschinger KM, Hetzer FH, Roos JE, et al. (2002) Dynamic MR imaging of the pelvic floor performed with patient sitting in an open-magnet unit versus with patient supine in a closed-magnet unit. Radiology 223(2):501–508. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2232010665
Vanbeckevoort D, Van Hoe L, Oyen R, et al. (1999) Pelvic floor descent in females: comparative study of colpocystodefecography and dynamic fast MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 9(3):373–377
Healy JC, Halligan S, Reznek RH, et al. (1997) Dynamic MR imaging compared with evacuation proctography when evaluating anorectal configuration and pelvic floor movement. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169(3):775–779. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.169.3.9275895
Schoenenberger AW, Debatin JF, Guldenschuh I, et al. (1998) Dynamic MR defecography with a superconducting, open-configuration MR system. Radiology 206(3):641–646. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.206.3.9494480
Flusberg M, Sahni VA, Erturk SM, Mortele KJ (2011) Dynamic MR defecography: assessment of the usefulness of the defecation phase. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196(4):W394–W399. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.10.4445
Bhan SN, Mnatzakanian GN, Nisenbaum R, Lee AB, Colak E (2016) MRI for pelvic floor dysfunction: can the strain phase be eliminated? Abdom Radiol (NY) 41(2):215–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0577-7
El Sayed RF, Alt CD, Maccioni F, et al. (2016) Magnetic resonance imaging of pelvic floor dysfunction—joint recommendations of the ESUR and ESGAR Pelvic Floor Working Group. Eur Radiol . https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4471-7
Agachan F, Chen T, Pfeifer J, Reissman P, Wexner SD (1996) A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients. Dis Colon Rectum 39(6):681–685
Jorge JM, Wexner SD (1993) Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 36(1):77–97
Gupta MK, Khatri G, Bailey A, et al. (2016) Endoluminal contrast for abdomen and pelvis magnetic resonance imaging. Abdom Radiol (NY) 41(7):1378–1398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-0668-0
El Sayed RF, El Mashed S, Farag A, Morsy MM, Abdel Azim MS (2008) Pelvic floor dysfunction: assessment with combined analysis of static and dynamic MR imaging findings. Radiology 248(2):518–530. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2482070974
Maglinte DD, Kelvin FM, Hale DS, Benson JT (1997) Dynamic cystoproctography: a unifying diagnostic approach to pelvic floor and anorectal dysfunction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169(3):759–767. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.169.3.9275893
Cicchetti DV (1994) Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol Assess 6:284–290
Goh V, Halligan S, Kaplan G, Healy JC, Bartram CI (2000) Dynamic MR imaging of the pelvic floor in asymptomatic subjects. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174(3):661–666. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.174.3.1740661
Schreyer AG, Paetzel C, Furst A, et al. (2012) Dynamic magnetic resonance defecography in 10 asymptomatic volunteers. World J Gastroenterol 18(46):6836–6842. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i46.6836
Rosenkrantz AB, Lewis MT, Yalamanchili S, et al. (2014) Prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse detected at dynamic MRI in women without history of pelvic floor dysfunction: comparison of two reference lines. Clin Radiol 69(2):e71–e77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2013.09.015
El Sayed RF, Alt CD, Maccioni F, et al. (2017) Magnetic resonance imaging of pelvic floor dysfunction—joint recommendations of the ESUR and ESGAR Pelvic Floor Working Group. Eur Radiol 27(5):2067–2085. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4471-7
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Funding
This study was not funded.
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schawkat, K., Heinrich, H., Parker, H.L. et al. How to define pathologic pelvic floor descent in MR defecography during defecation?. Abdom Radiol 43, 3233–3240 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1652-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1652-7