Abstract
Aim
To compare the diagnostic impact of 68Ga-DOTA-TATE and 18F-DOPA PET in the diagnosis of well-differentiated metastatic neuroendocrine tumours (NET).
Methods
PET/CT using both 68Ga-DOTA-TATE and 18F-DOPA was performed in 25 patients with histologically proven metastatic NET (nine gut, five pancreas, six lung, one paranasal sinus, four with unknown primary). Analyses of PET examinations were patient-based (pathological uptake: yes/no), and based on tumour regions (primary tumour if present and metastases of liver, lung, bones and lymph nodes). The results were compared with the results of contrast enhanced CT, and with plasma serotonin levels, which were available in 24 of the 25 patients.
Results
Patient-based sensitivities were 96% for 68Ga-DOTA-TATE PET and 56% for 18F-DOPA PET. 68Ga-DOTA-TATE PET delineated metastases in 54 of 55 positive metastatic tumour regions in contrast to 29 of 55 delineated by 18F-DOPA PET. Overall, 68Ga-DOTA-TATE was superior to 18F-DOPA in 13 patients (two patients showed fewer positive tumour regions with 18F-DOPA PET). The results were comparable in 12 patients. In 13 of 24 patients, plasma serotonin levels were elevated, and 11 of these 13 patients showed pathological uptake of 18F-DOPA. Of the 11 patients with normal levels of serotonin, 3 also showed positive 18F-DOPA uptake. In patients positive for 18F-DOPA uptake the maximum tumour SUVs were correlated with the levels of serotonin (r=0.66, p=0.01).
Conclusion
In this study 68Ga-DOTA-TATE PET proved clearly superior to 18F-DOPA PET for detection and staging of NET. 18F-DOPA uptake tended to be increased in those patients with elevated plasma serotonin. We conclude that 18F-DOPA PET should be employed in patients with NET with negative 68Ga-DOTA-TATE PET and elevated plasma serotonin.
References
Gabriel M, Decristoforo C, Kendler D, Dobrozemsky G, Heute D, Uprimny C, et al. 68Ga-DOTA-Tyr3-octreotide PET in neuroendocrine tumors: comparison with somatostatin receptor scintigraphy and CT. J Nucl Med 2007;48:508–18.
Belhocine T, Foidart J, Rigo P, Najjar F, Thiry A, Quatresooz P, et al. Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and somatostatin receptor scintigraphy for diagnosing and staging carcinoid tumours: correlations with the pathological indexes p53 and Ki-67. Nucl Med Commun 2002;23:727–34.
Orlefors H, Sundin A, Lu L, Oberg K, Langstrom B, Eriksson B, et al. Carbidopa pretreatment improves image interpretation and visualisation of carcinoid tumours with 11C-5-hydroxytryptophan positron emission tomography. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2006;33:60–5.
Montravers F, Grahek D, Kerrou K, Ruszniewski P, de Beco V, Aide N, et al. Can fluorodihydroxyphenylalanine PET replace somatostatin receptor scintigraphy in patients with digestive endocrine tumors? J Nucl Med 2006;47:1455–62.
Breeman WA, de Jong M, de Blois E, Bernard BF, Konijnenberg M, Krenning EP. Radiolabelling DOTA-peptides with 68Ga. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2005;32:478–85.
Luxen A, Perlmutter M, Bida GT, Van Moffaert G, Cook JS, Satyamurthy N, et al. Remote, semiautomated production of 6-[18F]fluoro-L-dopa for human studies with PET. Int J Rad Appl Instrum [A] 1990;41:275–81.
Eriksson B, Kloppel G, Krenning E, Ahlman H, Plockinger U, Wiedenmann B, et al. Consensus guidelines for the management of patients with digestive neuroendocrine tumors – well-differentiated jejunal-ileal tumor/carcinoma. Neuroendocrinology 2008;87:8–19.
Papotti M, Bongiovanni M, Volante M, Allia E, Landolfi S, Helboe L, et al. Expression of somatostatin receptor types 1-5 in 81 cases of gastrointestinal and pancreatic endocrine tumors. A correlative immunohistochemical and reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction analysis. Virchows Arch 2002;440:461–75.
Jager PL, Chirakal R, Marriott CJ, Brouwers AH, Koopmans KP, Gulenchyn KY. 6-L-18F-fluorodihydroxyphenylalanine PET in neuroendocrine tumors: basic aspects and emerging clinical applications. J Nucl Med 2008;49:573–86.
Saudek F, Brogren CH, Manohar S. Imaging the Beta-cell mass: why and how. Rev Diabet Stud 2008;5:6–12.
Ambrosini V, Tomassetti P, Castellucci P, Campana D, Montini G, Rubello D, et al. Comparison between (68)Ga-DOTA-NOC and (18)F-DOPA PET for the detection of gastro-entero-pancreatic and lung neuro-endocrine tumours. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2008;35:1431–8.
Timmers HJ, Hadi M, Carrasquillo JA, Chen CC, Martiniova L, Whatley M, et al. The effects of carbidopa on uptake of 6-18F-fluoro-L-DOPA in PET of pheochromocytoma and extraadrenal abdominal paraganglioma. J Nucl Med 2007;48:1599–606.
Acknowledgments
We thank Paul Cumming, Ph.D., for critical revisions of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Haug, A., Auernhammer, C.J., Wängler, B. et al. Intraindividual comparison of 68Ga-DOTA-TATE and 18F-DOPA PET in patients with well-differentiated metastatic neuroendocrine tumours. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 36, 765–770 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-008-1030-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-008-1030-8