Log in

The neck shaft angle: CT reference values of 800 adult hips

  • Scientific Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

A precise understanding of the radiological anatomy and biomechanics as well as reliable reference values of the hip are essential. The primary goal of this study was to provide reference values of the neck-shaft angle (NSA) for adult patients based on the analysis of rotation corrected computed tomography (CT) scans of 800 hips. The secondary aim was to compare these measurements with simulated anteroposterior roentgenograms of the pelvis.

Materials and methods

Pelvic CT scans of 400 patients (54.3 years, range 18–100 years; 200 female) were reconstructed in the derotated coronal plane of the proximal femur and as CT-based simulated anteroposterior roentgenograms of the pelvis in the anterior pelvic plane. Femora were categorized as coxa vara (<120°), physiologic (≥120° to <135°), and coxa valga (≥135°). Intra- and inter-rater reliability were analyzed.

Results

Primary research question: Mean NSA for male adults was 129.6° (range 113.2°–148.2°; SD 5.9°) and 131.9° (range 107.1°–151.9°; SD 6.8°) for females in derotated coronal reconstructions. Age (p < 0.001 in both views) and sex influenced the NSA significantly (p = 0.002 and p < 0.001); no significant differences were found between sides (p = 0.722 and p = 0.955). Overall, an excellent reliability of repeated measurements of one or two observers was found (ICC 0.891–0.995).

Secondary research question: NSA values measured in the simulated anteroposterior roentgenogram and the rotation corrected coronal reconstruction differed significantly (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

While anteroposterior pelvis radiographs are susceptible to rotational errors, the coronal reconstruction of the proximal femur in the femoral neck plane allows the correct measurement of the NSA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boese CK, Dargel J, Oppermann J, Eysel P, Scheyerer MJ, et al. The femoral neck-shaft angle on plain radiographs: a systematic review. Skelet Radiol. 2015;45:19–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mast NH, Impellizzeri F, Keller S, Leunig M. Reliability and agreement of measures used in radiographic evaluation of the adult hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:188–99.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lechler P, Frink M, Gulati A, Murray D, Renkawitz T, et al. The influence of hip rotation on femoral offset in plain radiographs. Acta Orthop. 2014;85:389–95.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Buecking B, Boese CK, Bergmeister VA, Frink M, Ruchholtz S, et al. Functional implications of femoral offset following hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fracture. Int Orthop. 2015.

  5. Haspl M, Bilic R. Assessment of femoral neck-shaft and antetorsion angles. Int Orthop. 1996;20:363–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jozwiak M, Rychlik M, Musielak B, Chen BP, Idzior M, et al. An accurate method of radiological assessment of acetabular volume and orientation in computed tomography spatial reconstruction. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015;16:42.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Waldt S, K. W. Measurements and classifications in musculoskeletal radiology. Harrogate, UK: Thieme; 2014.

  8. Tönnis D, Legal H. Die angeborene Hüftdysplasie und Hüftluxation im Kindes- und Erwachsenenalter: Grundlagen, Diagnostik, konservative und operative Behandlung. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer; 1984.

  9. Argenson JN, Flecher X, Parratte S, Aubaniac JM. Anatomy of the dysplastic hip and consequences for total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;465:40–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Anastopoulos G, Chissas D, Dourountakis J, Ntagiopoulos PG, Magnisalis E, et al. Computer-assisted three-dimensional correlation between the femoral neck-shaft angle and the optimal entry point for antegrade nailing. Injury. 2010;41:300–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Andruszkow H, Frink M, Fromke C, Matityahu A, Zeckey C, et al. Tip apex distance, hip screw placement, and neck shaft angle as potential risk factors for cut-out failure of hip screws after surgical treatment of intertrochanteric fractures. Int Orthop. 2012;36:2347–54.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Reikeras O, Hoiseth A, Reigstad A, Fonstelien E. Femoral neck angles: a specimen study with special regard to bilateral differences. Acta Orthop Scand. 1982;53:775–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gnudi S, Sitta E, Pignotti E. Prediction of incident hip fracture by femoral neck bone mineral density and neck-shaft angle: a 5 years longitudinal study in post-menopausal females. Br J Radiol. 2012;85:e467–73.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Elbuken F, Baykara M, Ozturk C. Standardisation of the neck-shaft angle and measurement of age-, gender- and BMI-related changes in the femoral neck using DXA. Singap Med J. 2012;53:587–90.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Weber M, Lechler P, von Kunow F, Vollner F, Keshmiri A, et al. The validity of a novel radiological method for measuring femoral stem version on anteroposterior radiographs of the hip after total hip arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2015;97-B:306–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Boddu K, Siebachmeyer M, Lakkol S, Rajayogeswaran B, Kavarthapu V, et al. Predicting the underestimation of the femoral offset in anteroposterior radiographs of the pelvis using ‘lesser trochanter index’: a 3D CT derived simulated radiographic analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29:1278–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nelitz M, Guenther KP, Gunkel S, Puhl W. Reliability of radiological measurements in the assessment of hip dysplasia in adults. Br J Radiol. 1999;72:331–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Julian Potthoff for his precious work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christoph Kolja Boese.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Boese, C.K., Jostmeier, J., Oppermann, J. et al. The neck shaft angle: CT reference values of 800 adult hips. Skeletal Radiol 45, 455–463 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-015-2314-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-015-2314-2

Keywords

Navigation