Abstract
Objective
To analyze knees in varying stages of osteoarthritis (OA) for the presence of coronal tibiofemoral (CTF) subluxation and to determine if CTF subluxation severity is related to knee OA worsening.
Methods
We retrospectively evaluated CTF subluxation and limb alignment in 113 patients with different stages of knee OA who were being considered for an arthroplasty procedure. Knee OA was classified as “mild” or “severe” according to Kellgren-Lawrence scale. CTF subluxation was measured in the study groups and in 40 knees of healthy controls using software developed specifically on the basis of Iterative Closest Point mathematical algorithm.
Results
Mean CTF subluxation in “mild OA” and “severe OA” groups was 3.5 % (±2) and 3.5 % (±5) of the tibial plateau, respectively. For both the mild and severe OA groups, CTF subluxation was significantly increased compared to the 1.4 % (±1) CTF subluxation in the control group, (p < 0.0001) and (p = 0.012), respectively. However, there was no significant difference in CTF subluxation between the mild OA and severe OA groups (p = 0.75). Limb varus malalignment in mild OA and severe OA groups was 3.6° (±2.2) and 5.3° (±2.6), respectively. Both significantly increased comparing to the 1° (±0.7) control group alignment (p < 0.0001). Varus malalignment in the severe OA group was significantly increased comparing to the mild OA group (p = 0.0003).
Conclusions
CTF subluxation is a radiographic finding related to knee OA which occurs mainly in the early stages of the osteoarthritic process and stagnates as OA progresses.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Salaffi F, Carotti M, Stancati A, Grassi W. Health-related quality of life in older adults with symptomatic hip and knee osteoarthritis: a comparison with matched healthy controls. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2005;17(4):255–63.
Felson D, Niu J, Sack B, Aliabadi P, McCullough C, Nevitt MC. Progression of osteoarthritis as a state of inertia. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012;72(6):924–9.
Hunter DJ, Sharma L, Skaife T. Alignment and osteoarthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91 Suppl 1:85–9.
Reijman M, Pols HA, Bergink AP, Hazes JM, Belo JN, Lievense AM, et al. Body mass index associated with onset and progression of osteoarthritis of the knee but not of the hip: the Rotterdam Study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2007;66(2):158–62.
Brouwer GM, van Tol AW, Bergink AP, Belo JN, Bernsen RM, Reijman M, et al. Association between valgus and varus alignment and the development and progression of radiographic osteoarthritis of the knee. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;56(4):1204–11.
Cerejo R, Dunlop DD, Cahue S, Channin D, Song J, Sharma L. The influence of alignment on risk of knee osteoarthritis progression according to baseline stage of disease. Arthritis Rheum. 2002;46(10):2632–6.
Tetsworth K, Paley D. Malalignment and degenerative arthropathy. Orthoped Clin North Am. 1994;25(3):367–77.
Roos H, Adalberth T, Dahlberg L, Lohmander LS. Osteoarthritis of the knee after injury to the anterior cruciate ligament or meniscus: the influence of time and age. Osteoarthritis and cartilage/OARS. Osteoarthr Res Soc. 1995;3(4):261–7.
Chang CB, Koh IJ, Seo ES, Kang YG, Seong SC, Kim TK. The radiographic predictors of symptom severity in advanced knee osteoarthritis with varus deformity. Knee. 2011;18(16):456–60.
Berger RA, Della Valle CJ. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: indications, techniques, and results. Instr Course Lect. 2010;59:47–56.
Nam D, Khamaisy S, Gladnick BP, Paul S, Pearle AD. Is tibiofemoral subluxation correctable in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty? J Arthroplast. 2013;28(9):1575–9.
Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS. Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1957;16(4):494–502.
Besl PJ, McKay ND. A method for registration of 3-D shapes. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 1992;14(2):239–56.
Khamaisy S, Zuiderbaan HA, Thein R, Nawabi DH, Joskowicz L, Pearle AD. Coronal tibiofemoral subluxation: a new measurement method. Knee. 2014;21(6):1069–71.
Munro BH. Statistical methods for health care research. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1997.
Sharma L, Lou C, Felson DT, Dunlop DD, Kirwan-Mellis G, Hayes KW, et al. Laxity in healthy and osteoarthritic knees. Arthritis Rheum. 1999;42(5):861–70.
Sharma L, Hayes KW, Felson DT, Buchanan TS, Kirwan-Mellis G, Lou C, et al. Does laxity alter the relationship between strength and physical function in knee osteoarthritis? Arthritis Rheum. 1999;42(1):25–32.
Tanamas S, Hanna FS, Cicuttini FM, Wluka AE, Berry P, Urquhart DM. Does knee malalignment increase the risk of development and progression of knee osteoarthritis? A systematic review. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;61(4):459–67.
Wong J, Steklov N, Patil S, Flores-Hernandez C, Kester M, Colwell Jr CW, et al. Predicting the effect of tray malalignment on risk for bone damage and implant subsidence after total knee arthroplasty. J Orthopaed Res Off Publ Orthopaed Res Soc. 2011;29(3):347–53.
Halder A, Kutzner I, Graichen F, Heinlein B, Beier A, Bergmann G. Influence of limb alignment on mediolateral loading in total knee replacement: in vivo measurements in five patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(11):1023–9.
Lee YS, Seon JK, Shin VI, Kim GH, Jeon M. Anatomical evaluation of CT-MRI combined femoral model. Biomed Eng. 2008;7:6.
Beek M, Small CF, Ellis RE, Sellens RW, Pichora DR. Bone alignment using the iterative closest point algorithm. J Appl Biomech. 2010;26(4):526–30.
Popescu F, Viceconti M, Grazi E, Cappello A. A new method to compare planned and achieved position of an orthopaedic implant. Comput Methods Prog Biomed. 2003;71(2):117–27.
Citak M, Suero EM, Citak M, Dunbar NJ, Branch SH, Conditt MA, et al. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: is robotic technology more accurate than conventional technique? Knee. 2012.
Source of funding
None
Compliance with ethical standards
None
Conflict of interest
No conflict of interest
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Khamaisy, S., Zuiderbaan, H.A., Thein, R. et al. Coronal tibiofemoral subluxation in knee osteoarthritis. Skeletal Radiol 45, 57–61 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-015-2244-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-015-2244-z