Log in

Bilateral atypical femoral fractures: how much symmetry is there on imaging?

  • Scientific Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate bilateral atypical femoral fractures (AFFs) and to compare imaging features of paired fractures.

Materials and methods

Bilateral femoral imaging studies of 124 patients on bisphosphonate therapy with at least one AFF were retrospectively reviewed. Time between AFF diagnoses was determined. The following imaging features were evaluated for each AFF: fracture location, femoral angle, length of cortical thickening, medial spike location, fracture orientation, and comminution. Associations between imaging findings on pairs of bilateral AFFs were assessed with Spearman’s correlation (rs) and the Kappa statistic (κ).

Results

Bilateral AFFs were present in 78/124 (62.9 %) cases (3 men, 75 women; mean age 67.3 years). Average time between contralateral AFF diagnoses was 10.3 months. Contralateral AFFs were diagnosed within 12 months of the index fracture in 60/78 (76.9 %) cases and within 3 years in 69/78 (88.5 %) cases. There was a strong correlation between bilateral AFF locations (rs = 0.65), with 58/76 (76.3 %) occurring within a distance of <5 cm and 41/76 (53.9 %) within a distance of ≤2.5 cm. Bilateral AFF pairs had moderately correlated femoral angles (rs = 0.42), and weakly correlated lengths of cortical thickening (rs = 0.28). There was substantial agreement for medial spike location (κ = 0.68) and fracture orientation (κ = 0.64), and moderate agreement for lack of comminution (κ = 0.42). All findings were independent of time between AFF diagnoses.

Conclusions

Patients with unilateral atypical femoral fractures are likely to be diagnosed with a contralateral AFF within the first year of presentation. Bilateral AFFs commonly have similar imaging features, including location along the femur.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. NIH Consensus Development Panel on Osteoporosis Prevention. Diagnosis and therapy. osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis and therapy. JAMA. 2001;285(6):785–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Desai PA, Vyas PA, Lane JM. Atypical femoral fractures: a review of the literature. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2013;11(3):179–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Capeci CM, Tejwani NC. Bilateral low-energy simultaneous or sequential femoral fractures in patients on long-term alendronate therapy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(11):2556–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schilcher J, Michaelsson K, Aspenberg P. Bisphosphonate use and atypical fractures of the femoral shaft. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1728–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Shane E, Burr D, Abrahamsen B, Adler RA, Brown TD, Cheung AM, et al. Atypical subtrochanteric and diaphyseal femoral fractures: second report of a task force of the american society for bone and mineral research. J Bone Miner Res. 2014;29(1):1–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Giusti A, Hamdy NA, Dekkers OM, Ramautar SR, Dijkstra SR, Papapoulos SE. Atypical fractures and bisphosphonate therapy: a cohort study of patients with femoral fracture with radiographic adjudication of fracture site and features. Bone. 2011;48(5):966–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lo JC, Huang SY, Lee GA, Khandewal S, Provus J, Ettinger B, et al. Clinical correlates of atypical femoral fracture. Bone. 2012;51(1):181–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Khan AA, Leslie WD, Lentle B, Illes S, Kaiser SM, Frame H, et al. Atypical femoral fractures: a teaching perspective. Can Assoc Radiol J [Internet]. 2014 Jul 19 [cited 2015 Apr 15]. Available from: http://www.carjonline.org/article/S0846-5371%2814%2900007-2/abstract [Epub ahead of print].

  9. Shane E, Burr D, Ebeling PR, Abrahamsen B, Adler RA, Brown TD, et al. Atypical subtrochanteric and diaphyseal femoral fractures: report of the task force of the american society for bone and mineral research. J Bone Miner Res. 2010;25(11):2267–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kwek EBK, Goh SK, Koh JS, Png MA, Howe TS. An emerging pattern of subtrochanteric stress fractures: a long-term complication of alendronate therapy? Injury. 2008;39(2):224–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Miyakoshi N, Aizawa T, Sasaki S, Ando S, Maekawa S, Aonuma H, et al. Healing of bisphosphonate-associated atypical femoral fractures in patients with osteoporosis: a comparison between treatments with and without teriparatide. J Bone Miner Metab [Internet]. 2014 Sep 17 [cited 2015 Apr 15]. Available from: http://springer.longhoe.net/article/10.1007%2Fs00774-014-0617-3 [Epub ahead of print].

  12. Nieves JW, Bilezikian JP, Lane JM, Einhorn TA, Wang Y, Steinbuch M, et al. Fragility fractures of the hip and femur: incidence and patient characteristics. Osteoporos Int. 2010;21(3):399–408.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Boston DA. Bilateral fractures of the femoral neck. Injury. 1982;14(3):207–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dretakis KE, Dretakis EK, Papakitsou EF, Psarkis S, Steriopoulos K. Possible predisposing factors for the second hip fracture. Calcif Tissue Int. 1998;62(4):366–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mautalen CA, Vega EM, Einhorn TA. Are the etiologies of cervical and trochanteric hip fractures different? Bone. 1996;18(3):133S–7S.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ferris BD, Kennedy C, Bhamra M, Muirhead-Allwood W. Morphology of the femur in proximal femoral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 1989;71(3):475–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Maffulli N, Dougall TW, Brown MT, Golden MH. Nutritional differences in patients with proximal femoral fractures. Age Ageing. 1999;28(5):458–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was not financially sponsored by any organization.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linda Probyn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Probyn, L., Cheung, A.M., Lang, C. et al. Bilateral atypical femoral fractures: how much symmetry is there on imaging?. Skeletal Radiol 44, 1579–1584 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-015-2212-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-015-2212-7

Keywords

Navigation