Log in

Variables decreasing tip movement of peripherally inserted central catheters in pediatric patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The position of the tip of a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) is crucial; malposition can lead to malfunction of the line or life-threatening events (e.g., arrhythmias, perforation).

Objective

To determine what factors other than arm position and accessed vein might influence the tip position of a PICC.

Materials and methods

Inclusion criteria were upper limb PICC placement, body weight <20 kg, intraoperative imaging with the arm in 0°, 45° and 90° abduction and an arm view marking the skin entry site relative to the shoulder. Evaluated variables included patient demographics, and PICC and insertion site characteristics. We measured central tip movement in rib units.

Results

We included 112 children who received a PICC (42 girls/70 boys, mean age 31±13 months, mean weight 6.5±4.9 kg). The overall range of central tip movement was -1 to +4 rib units (mean +0.8±0.7 rib units). Silicone PICCs moved significantly less than polyurethane PICCs (P<0.05). PICCs placed in the cephalic vein moved significantly less than those placed in other veins (P<0.05). Patient demographics and PICC characteristics (size, number of lumens, left or right arm accessed, length of the line) did not influence the range of central tip movement of a PICC (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Silicone PICCs and PICCs inserted into the cephalic vein move less than PICCs made of polyurethane and PICCs inserted into the brachial and basilic veins. These findings might assist operators in deciding which PICC to place in children in a given clinical context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Connolly B, Mawson JB, MacDonald CE et al (2000) Fluoroscopic landmark for SVC-RA junction for central venous catheter placement in children. Pediatr Radiol 30:692–695

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. NAoVA Networks (1998) NAVAN position statement. J Vasc Access Devices 3:8–10

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baskin KM, Jimenez RM, Cahill AM et al (2008) Cavoatrial junction and central venous anatomy: implications for central venous access tip position. J Vasc Interv Radiol 19:359–365

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Darling JC, Newell SJ, Mohamdee O et al (2001) Central venous catheter tip in the right atrium: a risk factor for neonatal cardiac tamponade. J Perinatol 21:461–464

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Murray BH, Cohle SD, Davison P (1996) Pericardial tamponade and death from Hickman catheter perforation. Am Surg 62:994–997

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Puel V, Caudry M, Le Métayer P et al (1993) Superior vena cava thrombosis related to catheter malposition in cancer chemotherapy given through implanted ports. Cancer 72:2248–2252

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Racadio JM, Doellman DA, Johnson ND et al (2001) Pediatric peripherally inserted central catheters: complication rates related to catheter tip location. Pediatrics 107:E28

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nadroo AM, Glass RB, Lin J et al (2002) Changes in upper extremity position cause migration of peripherally inserted central catheters in neonates. Pediatrics 110:131–136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Connolly B, Amaral J, Walsh S et al (2006) Influence of arm movement on central tip location of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs). Pediatr Radiol 36:845–850

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Crnich CJ, Halfmann JA, Crone WC et al (2005) The effects of prolonged ethanol exposure on the mechanical properties of polyurethane and silicone catheters used for intravascular access. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 26:708–714

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Walder T (2013) Thermoplastic polyurethanes as medical grade thermoplastic elastomer. 1–7. http://files.eventsential.org/61198b3c-1544-484a-a2b1-01ec6810ec04/event-58/29265646-Walder%20Paper%20Material%20101513[1]-thermoplastic.pdf. Accessed 5 May 2016

  12. Moran BJ, Sutton GL, Karran SJ (1992) Clinical evaluation of percutaneous insertion and long-term usage of a new cuffed polyurethane catheter for central venous access. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 74:426–429

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Young MD, Streicher MC, Beck RJ et al (2012) Simulation of lower limb axial arterial length change during locomotion. J Biomech 45:1485–1490

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Dubois J, Rypens F, Garel L et al (2007) Incidence of deep vein thrombosis related to peripherally inserted central catheters in children and adolescents. CMAJ 177:1185–1190

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Collins JL, Lutz RJ (1991) In vitro study of simultaneous infusion of incompatible drugs in multilumen catheters. Heart Lung 20:271–277

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gravenstein N, Blackshear RH (1991) In vitro evaluation of relative perforating potential of central venous catheters: comparison of materials, selected models, number of lumens, and angles of incidence to simulated membrane. J Clin Monit 7:1–6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Forauer AR, Alonzo M (2000) Change in peripherally inserted central catheter tip position with abduction and adduction of the upper extremity. J Vasc Interv Radiol 11:1315–1318

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Author Ralph Gnannt was supported by EMDO (Emily Dorothy Lageman) Foundation and Helmut-Hartweg Funds. We thank the Image-Guided Therapy team at the Hospital for Sick Children for assisting with recording and labeling of all the images used for our data analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ralph Gnannt.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gnannt, R., Connolly, B.L., Parra, D.A. et al. Variables decreasing tip movement of peripherally inserted central catheters in pediatric patients. Pediatr Radiol 46, 1532–1538 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-016-3648-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-016-3648-1

Keywords

Navigation