Log in

Utility of unenhanced fat-suppressed T1-weighted MRI in children with sickle cell disease — can it differentiate bone infarcts from acute osteomyelitis?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Children with sickle cell disease (SCD) are at risk of bone infarcts and acute osteomyelitis. The clinical differentiation between a bone infarct and acute osteomyelitis is a diagnostic challenge. Unenhanced T1-W fat-saturated MR images have been proposed as a potential tool to differentiate bone infarcts from osteomyelitis.

Objective

To evaluate the reliability of unenhanced T1-W fat-saturated MRI for differentiation between bone infarcts and acute osteomyelitis in children with SCD.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 31 children (20 boys, 11 girls; mean age 10.6 years, range 1.1–17.9 years) with SCD and acute bone pain who underwent MR imaging including unenhanced T1-W fat-saturated images from 2005 to 2010. Complete clinical charts were reviewed by a pediatric hematologist with training in infectious diseases to determine a clinical standard to define the presence or absence of osteomyelitis. A pediatric radiologist reviewed all MR imaging and was blinded to clinical information. Based on the signal intensity in T1-W fat-saturated images, the children were further classified as positive for osteomyelitis (low bone marrow signal intensity) or positive for bone infarct (high bone marrow signal intensity).

Results

Based on the clinical standard, 5 children were classified as positive for osteomyelitis and 26 children as positive for bone infarct (negative for osteomyelitis). The bone marrow signal intensity on T1-W fat-saturated imaging was not significant for the differentiation between bone infarct and osteomyelitis (P = 0.56). None of the additional evaluated imaging parameters on unenhanced MRI proved reliable in differentiating these diagnoses.

Conclusion

The bone marrow signal intensity on unenhanced T1-W fat-saturated MR images is not a reliable criterion to differentiate bone infarcts from osteomyelitis in children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wright J, Ahmedzai SH (2010) The management of painful crisis in sickle cell disease. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 4:97–106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Stuart MJ, Nagel RL (2004) Sickle-cell disease. Lancet 364:1343–1360

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Schnog JB, Duits AJ, Muskiet FA et al (2004) Sickle cell disease; a general overview. Neth J Med 62:364–374

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wong AL, Sakamoto KM, Johnson EE (2001) Differentiating osteomyelitis from bone infarction in sickle cell disease. Pediatr Emerg Care 17:60–63, quiz 64

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Keeley K, Buchanan GR (1982) Acute infarction of long bones in children with sickle cell anemia. J Pediatr 101:170–175

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Inusa BP, Oyewo A, Brokke F et al (2013) Dilemma in differentiating between acute osteomyelitis and bone infarction in children with sickle cell disease: the role of ultrasound. PLoS ONE 8:e65001

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Almeida A, Roberts I (2005) Bone involvement in sickle cell disease. Br J Haematol 129:482–490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Skaggs DL, Kim SK, Greene NW et al (2001) Differentiation between bone infarction and acute osteomyelitis in children with sickle-cell disease with use of sequential radionuclide bone-marrow and bone scans. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83:1810–1813

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Umans H, Haramati N, Flusser G (2000) The diagnostic role of gadolinium enhanced MRI in distinguishing between acute medullary bone infarct and osteomyelitis. Magn Reson Imaging 18:255–262

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bonnerot V, Sebag G, de Montalembert M et al (1994) Gadolinium-DOTA enhanced MRI of painful osseous crises in children with sickle cell anemia. Pediatr Radiol 24:92–95

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Stark JE, Glasier CM, Blasier RD et al (1991) Osteomyelitis in children with sickle cell disease: early diagnosis with contrast-enhanced CT. Radiology 179:731–733

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. William RR, Hussein SS, Jeans WD et al (2000) A prospective study of soft-tissue ultrasonography in sickle cell disease patients with suspected osteomyelitis. Clin Radiol 55:307–310

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sadat-Ali M, al-Umran K, al-Habdan I et al (1998) Ultrasonography: can it differentiate between vasoocclusive crisis and acute osteomyelitis in sickle cell disease? J Pediatr Orthop 18:552–554

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jain R, Sawhney S, Rizvi SG (2008) Acute bone crises in sickle cell disease: the T1 fat-saturated sequence in differentiation of acute bone infarcts from acute osteomyelitis. Clin Radiol 63:59–70

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gill FM, Sleeper LA, Weiner SJ et al (1995) Clinical events in the first decade in a cohort of infants with sickle cell disease. Cooperative study of sickle cell disease. Blood 86:776–783

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Embury SH (2004) The not-so-simple process of sickle cell vasoocclusion. Microcirculation 11:101–113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wun T (2001) The role of inflammation and leukocytes in the pathogenesis of sickle cell disease: haemoglobinopathy. Hematology 5:403–412

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chambers JB, Forsythe DA, Bertrand SL et al (2000) Retrospective review of osteoarticular infections in a pediatric sickle cell age group. J Pediatr Orthop 20:682–685

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jaramillo D (2011) Infection: musculoskeletal. Pediatr Radiol 41:S127–S134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Frush DP, Heyneman LE, Ware RE et al (1999) MR features of soft-tissue abnormalities due to acute marrow infarction in five children with sickle cell disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 173:989–993

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dillman JR, Ellis JH, Cohan RH et al (2011) Safety of gadolinium-based contrast material in sickle cell disease. J Magn Reson Imaging 34:917–920

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jorge Delgado.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Delgado, J., Bedoya, M.A., Green, A.M. et al. Utility of unenhanced fat-suppressed T1-weighted MRI in children with sickle cell disease — can it differentiate bone infarcts from acute osteomyelitis?. Pediatr Radiol 45, 1981–1987 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-015-3423-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-015-3423-8

Keywords

Navigation