Log in

Prenatal diagnosis of craniosynostosis: value of MR imaging

  • Paediatric Neuroradiology
  • Published:
Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The aim of our study was to assess the utility and reliability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in antenatal diagnosis of craniosynostosis.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the MRI examinations of the head of 15 fetuses requested over a period of 11 years on the basis of sonographic suspicion of craniosynostosis. The postnatal diagnosis was available for 14 neonates.

Results

No termination of pregnancy was performed. There were four neonates with sporadic multisuture craniosynostoses, three of which were syndromic, including one Crouzon and one Pfeiffer syndrome. Eight neonates were normal, two showed cranial vault deformities without synostosis, and one was lost to follow-up. MRI showed a high predictive value for craniosynostosis, as there were no false-negative or false-positive diagnoses. However, the severity of the abnormalities were underestimated in two neonates.

Conclusion

We suggest that prenatal MRI has diagnostic value when synostosis is suspected on ultrasonography. Moreover, MRI is accurate in the detection of associated brain abnormalities, which is an important prognostic issue in this diagnosis. Prenatal diagnosis of craniosynostosis is difficult and could benefit from three-dimensional ultrasonography and three-dimensional CT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Delahaye S, Bernard JP, Renier D, Ville Y (2003) Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of fetal craniosynostosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 21(4):347–353

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Benacerraf BR, Spiro R, Mitchell AG (2000) Using three-dimensional ultrasound to detect craniosynostosis in a fetus with Pfeiffer syndrome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 16(4):391–394

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Nazzaro A, Della Monica M, Lonardo F et al (2004) Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of a case of Pfeiffer syndrome without cloverleaf skull and review of the literature. Prenat Diagn 24(11):918–922

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Blaumeiser B, Loquet P, Wuyts W, Nothen MM (2004) Prenatal diagnosis of Pfeiffer syndrome type II. Prenat Diagn 24(8):644–646

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bernstein PS, Gross SJ, Cohen DJ et al (1996) Prenatal diagnosis of type 2 Pfeiffer syndrome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 8(6):425–428

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gorincour G, Rypens F, Grignon A et al (2005) Prenatal diagnosis of cloverleaf skull: watch the hands! Fetal Diagn Ther 20(4):296–300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ghi T, Perolo A, Banzi C et al (2002) Two-dimensional ultrasound is accurate in the diagnosis of fetal craniofacial malformation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 19(6):543–551

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Itoh S, Nojima M, Yoshida K (2006) Usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging for accurate diagnosis of Pfeiffer syndrome type II in utero. Fetal Diagn Ther 21(2):168–171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pooh RK, Nakagawa Y, Pooh KH, Nakagawa Y, Nagamachi N (1999) Fetal craniofacial structure and intracranial morphology in a case of Apert syndrome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 13(4):274–278

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hansen WF, Rijhsinghani A, Grant S, Yankowitz J (2004) Prenatal diagnosis of Apert syndrome. Fetal Diagn Ther 19(2):127–130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mahieu-Caputo D, Sonigo P, Amiel J et al (2001) Prenatal diagnosis of sporadic Apert syndrome: a sequential diagnostic approach combining three-dimensional computed tomography and molecular biology. Fetal Diagn Ther 16(1):10–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Boog G, Le Vaillant C, Winer N et al (1999) Contribution of tridimensional sonography and magnetic resonance imaging to prenatal diagnosis of Apert syndrome at mid-trimester. Fetal Diagn Ther 14(1):20–23

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Skidmore DL, Pai AP, Toi A, Steele L, Chitayat D (2003) Prenatal diagnosis of Apert syndrome: report of two cases. Prenat Diagn 23(12):1009–1013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ferreira JC, Carter SM, Bernstein PS et al (1999) Second-trimester molecular prenatal diagnosis of sporadic Apert syndrome following suspicious ultrasound findings. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 14(6):426–430

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Barkovich AJ (2000) Pediatric neuroimaging. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 360–369

    Google Scholar 

  16. Krakow D, Santulli T, Platt LD (2001) Use of three-dimensional ultrasonography in differentiating craniosynostosis from severe fetal molding. J Ultrasound Med 20(4):427–431

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Robson CD, Barnewolt CE (2004) MR imaging of fetal head and neck anomalies. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 14(2):273–291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ruano R, Molho M, Roume J, Ville Y (2004) Prenatal diagnosis of fetal skeletal dysplasias by combining two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasound and intrauterine three-dimensional helical computer tomography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 24(2):134–140

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Irsutti Fjørtoft.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fjørtoft, M.I., Sevely, A., Boetto, S. et al. Prenatal diagnosis of craniosynostosis: value of MR imaging. Neuroradiology 49, 515–521 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-007-0212-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-007-0212-6

Keywords

Navigation