Log in

A new approach to eliminate stress for two probiotics with chemicals in vitro

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
European Food Research and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of some chemicals to eliminate stress for two probiotics cultivation was studied. Lactobacillus acidophilus was incubated with sodium citrate or calcium carbonate at 37 °C for 19 h, or Bifidobacterium bifidum was incubated with sodium d-isoascorbate or sodium ascorbate at 37 °C for 24 h in an anaerobic chamber, aiming to eliminate acidic or oxidative stress produced during culture. Viable count of L. acidophilus or B. bifidum in culture was counted with standard plate counting technique. The result showed that the viable count of L. acidophilus or B. bifidum in culture had an increase about twofold compared with that of control. The mechanism involved was discussed preliminary. Chemical destressing effect of sodium citrate and calcium carbonate on L. acidophilus, or chemical destressing effect of sodium d-isoascorbate and sodium ascorbate on B. bifidum, might provide a potential approach for probiotic production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Ahn JB, Hwang HJ, Park JH (2001) Physiological responses of oxygen-tolerant anaerobic Bifidobacterium longum under oxygen. Microbiol Biotechnol 11(3):443–451

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beom SK, Seung CL, Sang YL et al (2004) High cell density fed-batch cultivation of Escherichia coli using exponential feeding combined with pH-stat. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 26:147–150

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Corbo MR, Albenzio M, De Angelis M, Sevi A, Gobbetti M (2001) Microbiological and biochemical properties of Canestrato Pugliese hard cheese supplemented with bifidobacteria. J Dairy Sci 84:551–561

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Desmond C, Stanton C, Fitzgerald GF, Collins K, Ross RP (2002) Environmental adaptation of probiotic lactobacilli towards improvement of performance during spray drying. Int Dairy J 12:183–190

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. FAO/WHO (2001) Evaluation of health and nutritional properties of powder milk with live lactic acid bacteria. Report from FAO/WHO Expert Consultation, 1–4 October 2001, Cordoba, Argentina

  6. Gilliland SE, Reilly SS, Kim GB, Kim HS (2002) Viability during storage of selected probiotic lactobacilli and bifidobacteria in a yogurt-like product. J Food Sci 67:3091–3095

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Godward G, Kailasapathy K (2003) Viability and survival of free, encapsulated and co-encapsulated probiotic bacteria in ice cream. Milchwissenschaft 58:161–164

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Heller KJ (2001) Probiotic bacteria in fermented foods: product characteristics and starter organisms. Am J Clin Nutr 73:374–379

    Google Scholar 

  9. Krebs HA (1970) The history of the tricarboxylic acid cycle prespect. Biol Med 14:154–170

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kurmann JA, Rasic JL (1991) The health potential of products containing bifidobacteria. In: Robinson RK (ed) Therapeutic properties of fermented milks, pp 117–157

  11. Bolduc M-P, Raymond Y, Fustier P et al (2006) Sensitivity of bifidobacteria to oxygen and redox potential in non-fermented pasteurized milk. Int Dairy J 16:1038–1048

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Maus JE, Ingham SC (2003) Employment of stressful conditions during culture production to enhance subsequent cold- and acid-tolerance of bifidobacteria. J Appl Microbiol 95:146–154

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mondal K, Lalvani SB (2003) Electrochemical hydrogenation of canola oil using a hydrogen transfer agent. J Am Oil Chem Soc 80:1135–1141

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Reilly SS, Gilliland SE (1999) Bifidobacterium longum survival during frozen and refrigerated storage as related to pH during growth. J Food Sci 64:714–718

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ross RP, Desmond C, Fitzgerald GF, Stanton C (2005) Overcoming the technological hurdles in the development of probiotic foods. J Appl Microbiol 98:1410–1417

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Stanton C, Desmond C, Coakley M, Collins JK, Fitzgerald G, Ross RP (2003a) Challenges facing development of probiotic-containing functional foods. In: Farnworth ER (ed) Handbook of functional fermented foods, chap 11. CRC Press, Boca Raton

  17. Stanton C, Desmond C, Fitzgerald G, Ross RP (2003) Probiotic health benefits—reality or myth? Aust J Dairy Technol 58:107–113

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Stanton C, Gardiner G, Meehan H, Collins K, Fitzgeralg G, Lynch PB, Ross RP (2001) Market potential for probiotics. Am J Clin Nutr 73:476–483

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tamime AY, Marshall VM, Robinson RK (1995) Microbiological and technological aspects of milks fermented by bifidobacteria. J Dairy Res 62:151–187

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to **n-huai Zhao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhao, Xh., Li, D. A new approach to eliminate stress for two probiotics with chemicals in vitro. Eur Food Res Technol 227, 1569–1574 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-008-0862-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-008-0862-6

Keywords

Navigation