Abstract
Rationale
Experimental research is needed in investigating how early smoking abstinence affects relapse risk.
Objective
The present study assessed the feasibility of promoting smoking abstinence using once- rather than thrice-daily abstinence monitoring and the relationship between different durations of initial abstinence and changes in smoking preference.
Methods
Participants were 34 adult smokers randomized into one of two conditions: 14-day (14C) and 1-day (1C) contingent payment for smoking abstinence. Smoking status and participant ratings were assessed daily; a delay discounting task involving hypothetical money and an inter-temporal choice task involving hypothetical money and cigarettes were administered at baseline and days 7 and 14; a direct test of preference for smoking versus money was assessed on day 14.
Results
Once-daily monitoring gained robust experimental control over smoking abstinence. No differences in delay discounting for hypothetical money were observed between the two conditions. Compared to the 1C condition, participants in the 14C condition (1) showed significant increases in the mean percent of delayed hypothetical money over cigarettes choices in the inter-temporal choice task, (2) were significantly less likely to ever choose the smoking option in the direct test of preference for smoking versus money, and (3) reported greater ease of abstaining from smoking and lower nicotine withdrawal and craving.
Conclusions
These results offer a more efficient procedure for experimentally promoting smoking abstinence, while providing further evidence that an initial period of sustained abstinence produces a profile of changes consistent with an overall lowering of relapse risk.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00213-009-1541-4/MediaObjects/213_2009_1541_Fig1_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00213-009-1541-4/MediaObjects/213_2009_1541_Fig2_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00213-009-1541-4/MediaObjects/213_2009_1541_Fig3_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00213-009-1541-4/MediaObjects/213_2009_1541_Fig4_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00213-009-1541-4/MediaObjects/213_2009_1541_Fig5_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00213-009-1541-4/MediaObjects/213_2009_1541_Fig6_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00213-009-1541-4/MediaObjects/213_2009_1541_Fig7_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00213-009-1541-4/MediaObjects/213_2009_1541_Fig8_HTML.gif)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahijevych KL, Tyndale RF, Dhatt RK, Weed HG, Browning KK (2002) Factors influencing cotinine half-life during smoking abstinence in African American and Caucasian women. Nicotine Tob Res 4:423–431
Alessi SM, Badger GJ, Higgins ST (2004) An experimental examination of the initial weeks of abstinence in cigarette smokers. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 12:276–287
Dallery J, Raiff BR (2007) Delay discounting predicts smoking in a laboratory model of abstinence reinforcement. Psychopharmacology 190:485–496
Benowitz NL, Jacob P, Ahijevych K, Jarvis MF, Hall S, LeHouezec J, Hansson A, Lichtenstein E, Henningfield J, Tsoh J, Hurt RD, Velicer W (2002) Biochemical verification of tobacco use and cessation. Nicotine Tob Res 4:149–159
Bickel WK, Marsch LA (2001) Toward a behavioral economic understanding of drug dependence: delay discounting processes. Addiction 96:73–86
Bickel WK, Odum AL, Madden GJ (1999) Impulsivity and cigarette smoking: delay-discounting in current, never, and ex-smokers. Psychopharmacology 146:447–454
Box GEP, Hunter WG, Hunter JS (1978) Statistics for experimenters. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data, United States of America
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2005) Annual smoking-attributable mortality, years of potential life lost, and productivity losses—United States 1997–2001. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 54:625–628
Chivers LL, Higgins ST, Heil SH, Badger GJ (2008) Effects of initial abstinence and programmed lapses on the relative reinforcing effects of cigarette smoking. J Appl Behav Anal 41:481–497
Dunn KE, Sigmon SC, Thomas CS, Heil S, Higgins ST (2008) Voucher-based contingent reinforcement of smoking abstinence among methadone-maintained patients: a pilot study. J Appl Behav Anal 41:527–538
Gilbert DG, Crauthers DM, Mooney DK, McClernon FJ, Jensen RA (1999) Effects ofmonetary contingencies on smokking relapse: influences of trait, depression, personality, and habitual nicotine intake. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 7:174–181
Giordano LA, Bickel WK, Loewenstein G, Jacobs EA, Marsch LA, Badger GJ (2002) Mild opioid deprivation increases the degree that opioid-dependent outpatients discount delayed heroin and money. Psychopharmacology 163:174–182
Gourlay SG, Forbes A, Marriner T, Pethica D, McNeil JJ (1994) Prospective study of factors predicting outcome of transdermal nicotine treatment in smoking cessation. British Journal of Medicine 309:842–846
Griffiths RR, Troisi JR, Silverman K, Mumford GK (1993) Multiple-choice procedure: an efficient approach for investigating drug reinforcement in humans. Behav Pharmacol 4:3–13
Heil SH, Alessi SM, Lussier JP, Badger GJ, Higgins ST (2004) An experimental test of the influence of prior cigarette smoking abstinence on future abstinence. Nicotine Tob Res 6:471–479
Higgins ST, Badger GJ, Budney AJ (2000) Initial abstinence and success in achieving longer term cocaine abstinence. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 8:377–386
Higgins ST, Delaney DD, Budney AJ, Bickel WK, Hughes JR, Foerg F et al (1991) A behavioral approach to achieving initial cocaine abstinence. Am J Psychiatry 148:1218–1224
Higgins ST, Heil SH, Dantona R, Donham R, Matthews M, Badger GJ (2007) Effects of varying the monetary value of voucher-based incentives on abstinence achieved during and following treatment among cocaine-dependent outpatients. Addiction 102:271–281
Higgins ST, Heil SH, Solomon LJ, Bernstein IM, Lussier JP, Abel RL et al (2004) A pilot study on voucher-based incentives to promote abstinence from cigarette smoking during pregnancy and postpartum. Nicotine Tob Res 6:1015–1020
Higgins ST, Silverman K, Heil SH (2008) Contingency management in substance abuse treatment. Guilford, New York
Hughes JR, Hatsukami D (1986) Signs and symptoms of tobacco withdrawal. Arch Gen Psychiatry 43:289–294
Hughes JR, Keely J, Naud S (2004) Shape of the relapse curve and long-term abstinence among untreated smokers. Addiction 99:29–38
Johnson MW, Bickel WK (2002) Within-subject comparison of real and hypothetical money rewards in delay discounting. J Exp Anal Behav 77:129–46
Kenford SL, Fiore MC, Jorenby DE, Smith SS, Wetter D, Baker TB (1994) Predicting smoking cessation. Who will quit with and without the nicotine patch. JAMA 271:589–594
Krishnan-Sarin S, Reynolds B, Duhig AM, Smith A, Liss T, McFetridge A et al (2007) Behavioral impulsivity predicts treatment outcome in a smoking cessation program for adolescent smokers. Drug Alcohol Depend 88:79–82
Lussier JP, Higgins ST, Badger GJ (2005) Influence of the duration of abstinence on the relative reinforcing effects of cigarette smoking. Psychopharmacology 181:486–495
Mazur JE (1987) An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement. In: Commons ML, Mazur JE, Nevin JA, Rachlin H (eds) Quantitative analysis of behavior: vol 5. The effect of delay and intervening events on reinforcement value. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 55–73
McNair M, Lorr A, Droppleman LF (1971) Manual for the profile of mood states. Educational and Industrial Testing Service, San Diego
Mitchell SH (2004) Effects of short-term nicotine deprivation on decision-making: delay, uncertainty and effort discounting. Nicotine Tob Res 6:819–828
Mumford GK, Rush CR, Griffiths RR (1995) Abecarnil and alprazolam in humans: behavioral, subjective, and reinforcing effects. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 272:570–580
Reynolds B, Patak M, Shroff P, Penfold RB, Melanko S, Duhig AM (2007) Laboratory and self-report assessments of impulsive behavior in adolescent daily smokers and nonsmokers. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 15:264–271
Roll JM, Higgins ST (2000) A within-subject comparison of three different schedules of reinforcement of drug abstinence using cigarette smoking as an exemplar. Drug Alcohol Depend 58:103–109
Roll JM, Higgins ST, Badger GJ (1996) An experimental comparison of three different schedules of reinforcement of drug abstinence using cigarette smoking as an exemplar. J Appl Behav Anal 29:495–504
Skar** G, Willers S, Dalene M (1988) Determination of cotinine in urine using glass capillary gas chromatography and selective detection, with special reference to the biological monitoring of passive smoking. J Chromatogr 11:293–301
Stitzer ML, Rand CS, Bigelow GE, Mead AM (1986) Contingent payment procedures for smoking reduction and cessation. J Appl Behav Anal 19:197–202
Tiffany ST, Drobes DJ (1991) The development and initial validation of a questionnaire on smoking urges. Br J Addict 86:1467–1476
Yoon JH, Higgins ST, Heil ST, Sugarbaker RJ, Thomas CS, Badger GJ (2007) Delay discounting predicts postpartum relapse to cigarette smoking among pregnant women. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 15:176–186
Yudkin PL, Jones L, Lancaster T, Fowler GH (1996) Which smokers are helped to give up smoking using transdermal nicotine patches? Results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Br J Gen Pract 46:145–148
Zacny JP, Stitzer ML, Brown FJ, Yingling JE, Griffiths RR (1987) Human cigarette smoking: effects of puff and inhalation parameters on smoke exposure. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 240:554–564
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yoon, J.H., Higgins, S.T., Bradstreet, M.P. et al. Changes in the relative reinforcing effects of cigarette smoking as a function of initial abstinence. Psychopharmacology 205, 305–318 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-009-1541-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-009-1541-4