Log in

Probabilistic ampacity forecasting for overhead lines using weather forecast ensembles

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Electrical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Dynamic thermal rating of overhead lines is a promising approach to increase transmission capacity by calculating weather-dependent thermal ratings (ampacities) of overhead lines in real time instead of using constant ratings. However, knowledge about ampacity is not only needed in real time but also on a day-ahead basis within network operational planning in order to assess network security. As life of humans may be endangered by inadmissible sag of overhead lines when current limits are violated there are high safety requirements concerning thermal ratings. Therefore, ampacity forecasts have to be complemented by a description of forecast uncertainty. So far, there is no method to forecast ampacities on a day-ahead basis considering uncertainty. As a comprehensive description of uncertainty is given by probability densities, this paper presents a novel method to calculate probability density functions of future ampacities based on probabilistic weather forecasts. The method’s functionality is proved by application to exemplary data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Davis MW (1977) A new thermal rating approach: the real time thermal rating system for strategic overhead conductor transmission lines—part I: general description and justification of the real time thermal rating system. IEEE Trans Power App Syst 96: 803–809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Seppa TO (1995) Accurate ampacity determination: temperature-sag model for operational real time ratings. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 10: 1460–1470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Adapa R, Douglass DA (2005) Dynamic thermal ratings: monitors and calculation methods. Proc Power Eng Soc Inaug Conf, pp 163–167

  4. Deb AK (2000) Powerline ampacity system: theory, modeling and applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang J, Pu J, McCalley JD, Stern H, Gallus WA Jr (2002) A Bayesian approach for short-term transmission overload risk assessment. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 17: 770–778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim DM, Kim JO (2009) Prediction of transmission-line rating based on thermal overload probability using weather models. Eur Trans Electr Power 20: 534–544

    Google Scholar 

  7. Buizza R, Houtekamer P, Pellerin G, Toth Z, Zhu Y, Wei M (2005) A comparison of the ECMWF, MSC, and NCEP global ensemble prediction systems. Mon Weather Rev 133: 1076–1097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ringelband T (2009) Entwicklung einer Methode zur probabilistischen Prognose der Stromtragfähigkeit von Freileitungsseilen. ETG-Fachbericht 118: 149–154

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lynch P (2007) The origins of computer weather prediction and climate modeling. J Comput Phys 227: 3431–3444

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Robinson AR, Lermusiaux PFJ (2000) Overview of data assimilation. Harvard Rep Phys Interdisciplin Ocean Sci 62: 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  11. Raftery AE, Gneiting T, Balabdaoui F, Polakowski M (2005) Using Bayesian model averaging to calibrate forecast ensembles. Mon Weather Rev 133: 1155–1174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fraley C, Raftery AE, Gneiting T, McLean Sloughter J (2007) EnsembleBMA: an R package for probabilistic forecasting using ensembles and Bayesian model averaging, Technical Report No. 516. Department of Statistics, University of Washington, Seattle

  13. National Centers for Environmental Prediction (2008) NCEP Ensemble Products. http://www.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/gmb/ens/ (accessed 2010)

  14. Zhu Y, Toth Z, Wobus R, Richardson D, Mylne K (2002) The economic value of ensemble-based weather forecasts. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 83: 73–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. IEEE (2007) IEEE Standard for calculating the current-temperature of bare overhead conductors. IEEE Std. 738-2006

  16. Pielke RA (1984) Mesoscale meteorological modeling. Academic Press, Orlando

    Google Scholar 

  17. Skamarock WC, Klemp JB, Dudhia J, Gill DO, Barker DM, Duda MG, Huang XY, Wang W, Powers JG (2008) A description of the advanced research WRF Version 3/National Center for Atmospheric Research. http://www.mmm.ucar.edu/wrf/users/docs/arw_v3.PDF (accessed 2008)

  18. University Corporation for Atmospheric Research (2008) WRF Public Domain Notice. http://www.mmm.ucar.edu/wrf/users/public.html (accessed 2008)

  19. Conradsen K, Nielsen LB (1984) Review of Weibull statistics for estimation of wind speed distributions. J Appl Meteorol 23: 1173–1183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fisher NI (1993) Statistical analysis of circular data. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Dempster AP, Laird NM, Rubin DB (1977) Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J Roy Stat Soc B Met 39: 1–38

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Jiang S, Kececioglu D (1992) Maximum likelihood estimates, from censored data, for mixed-Weibull distributions. IEEE Trans Reliab 41: 248–255

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Abramowitz M, Stegun IA (1964) Handbook of mathematical functions with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables. Courier Dover Publications, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Deuflhard P (2004) Newton methods for nonlinear problems. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Box GEP, Muller ME (1958) A note on the generation of random normal deviates. Ann Math Stat 29: 610–611

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Devroye L (1986) Non-uniform random variate generation. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Best DJ, Fisher NI (1979) Efficient simulation of the von Mises distribution. J Roy Stat Soc C Appl Stat 28: 152–157

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Matsumoto M, Nishimura T (1998) Mersenne twister: a 623-dimensionally equidistributed uniform pseudo-random number generator. ACM Trans Model Comput Simul 8: 3–30

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Rosenblatt M (1952) Remarks on a multivariate transformation. Ann Math Stat 23: 470–472

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tilman Ringelband.

Additional information

This work was conducted at the Institute of Power Systems and Power Economics of RWTH Aachen University. It was supported in part by the RWE Fellowship Program (RWE Studienförderung).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ringelband, T., Schäfer, P. & Moser, A. Probabilistic ampacity forecasting for overhead lines using weather forecast ensembles. Electr Eng 95, 99–107 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-012-0244-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-012-0244-8

Keywords

Navigation