Log in

Two-persons efficient risk-sharing and equilibria for concave law-invariant utilities

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Economic Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Efficient risk-sharing rules and equilibria between two agents with utilities in a class that contains the rank dependent expected utility (RDU) are fully characterized. Specific attention is given to the RDU. Call-spreads and contracts with mixed regimes are shown to be efficient. Closed-form solutions are obtained for several examples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Carlier, G.: Differentiability of rank linear utilities. J Math Econ (2007, to appear)

  • Carlier G., Dana R.-A. (2005) Rearrangement inequalities in non convex insurance models. J Math Econ 41, 483–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlier G., Dana R.-A. (2003) Core of a convex distortion of a probability. J Econ Theory 113, 199–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlier, G., Dana, R.-A.: Computing the demand of agents with a law invariant utility, working paper CEREMADE, 2007-4. Available at http://www.ceremade.dauphine.fr/

  • Carlier G., Dana R.-A. (2006) Law invariant concave utility functions and optimization problems with monotonicity and comonotonicity constraints. Stat Decis 24.1: 127–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chew S.H., Epstein L. (1989) A unifying approach to axiomatic non-expected utility theories. J Econ Theory 49, 207–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chew S.H., Karni E., Safra E. (1987) Risk aversion in the theory of expected utility with Rank dependent probabilities. Journal of Economic Theory 42, 370–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chew S.H., Wakker P. (1996) The comonotonic sure-thing principle. J Risk Uncertain 12, 5–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dana R.-A. (2005) A representation result for concave Schur concave functions. Math Finance 15, 613–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denneberg D. (1994) Non-additive measures and integral. Holland, Kluwer

    Google Scholar 

  • Gollier C. (2001) The economics of risk and time. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Green J., Jullien B. (1988) Ordinal independence in non-linear utility theory. J Risk Uncertain 1, 355–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang C.F., Litzenberger R.H. (1988) Foundations for financial economics. Amsterdam, North-Holland

    Google Scholar 

  • Landsberger M., Meilijson I. (1994) Comonotone allocations, Bickel-Lehmann dispersion and the Arrow-Pratt measure of risk aversion. Ann Oper Res 52, 97–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mussa M., Rosen S. (1978) Monopoly and product quality. J Econ Theory 18, 301–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Carlier.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carlier, G., Dana, R.A. Two-persons efficient risk-sharing and equilibria for concave law-invariant utilities. Economic Theory 36, 189–223 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-007-0266-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-007-0266-z

Keywords

JEL Classification Numbers

Navigation